James Johnson1, Victoria M Harman2, Catarina Franco2, Edward Emmott2, Nichola Rockliffe1, Yaqi Sun3, Lu-Ning Liu3, Ayako Takemori4, Nobuaki Takemori4, Robert J Beynon5. 1. GeneMill, Institute of Systems Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK. 2. Centre for Proteome Research, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L697ZB, UK. 3. Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L697ZB, UK. 4. Division of Analytical Bio-Medicine, Advanced Research Support Center, Ehime University, Shitsukawa, Toon, Ehime, Japan. 5. Centre for Proteome Research, Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L697ZB, UK. rbeynon@liverpool.ac.uk.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: QconCATs are quantitative concatamers for proteomic applications that yield stoichiometric quantities of sets of stable isotope-labelled internal standards. However, changing a QconCAT design, for example, to replace poorly performing peptide standards has been a protracted process. RESULTS: We report a new approach to the assembly and construction of QconCATs, based on synthetic biology precepts of biobricks, making use of loop assembly to construct larger entities from individual biobricks. The basic building block (a Qbrick) is a segment of DNA that encodes two or more quantification peptides for a single protein, readily held in a repository as a library resource. These Qbricks are then assembled in a one tube ligation reaction that enforces the order of assembly, to yield short QconCATs that are useable for small quantification products. However, the DNA context of the short construct also allows a second cycle of loop assembly such that five different short QconCATs can be assembled into a longer QconCAT in a second, single tube ligation. From a library of Qbricks, a bespoke QconCAT can be assembled quickly and efficiently in a form suitable for expression and labelling in vivo or in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: We refer to this approach as the ALACAT strategy as it permits à la carte design of quantification standards. ALACAT methodology is a major gain in flexibility of QconCAT implementation as it supports rapid editing and improvement of QconCATs and permits, for example, substitution of one peptide by another.
BACKGROUND: QconCATs are quantitative concatamers for proteomic applications that yield stoichiometric quantities of sets of stable isotope-labelled internal standards. However, changing a QconCAT design, for example, to replace poorly performing peptide standards has been a protracted process. RESULTS: We report a new approach to the assembly and construction of QconCATs, based on synthetic biology precepts of biobricks, making use of loop assembly to construct larger entities from individual biobricks. The basic building block (a Qbrick) is a segment of DNA that encodes two or more quantification peptides for a single protein, readily held in a repository as a library resource. These Qbricks are then assembled in a one tube ligation reaction that enforces the order of assembly, to yield short QconCATs that are useable for small quantification products. However, the DNA context of the short construct also allows a second cycle of loop assembly such that five different short QconCATs can be assembled into a longer QconCAT in a second, single tube ligation. From a library of Qbricks, a bespoke QconCAT can be assembled quickly and efficiently in a form suitable for expression and labelling in vivo or in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: We refer to this approach as the ALACAT strategy as it permits à la carte design of quantification standards. ALACAT methodology is a major gain in flexibility of QconCAT implementation as it supports rapid editing and improvement of QconCATs and permits, for example, substitution of one peptide by another.
Authors: Siegfried Gessulat; Tobias Schmidt; Daniel Paul Zolg; Patroklos Samaras; Karsten Schnatbaum; Johannes Zerweck; Tobias Knaute; Julia Rechenberger; Bernard Delanghe; Andreas Huhmer; Ulf Reimer; Hans-Christian Ehrlich; Stephan Aiche; Bernhard Kuster; Mathias Wilhelm Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2019-05-27 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Julie M Pratt; Deborah M Simpson; Mary K Doherty; Jenny Rivers; Simon J Gaskell; Robert J Beynon Journal: Nat Protoc Date: 2006 Impact factor: 13.491
Authors: Craig Lawless; Stephen W Holman; Philip Brownridge; Karin Lanthaler; Victoria M Harman; Rachel Watkins; Dean E Hammond; Rebecca L Miller; Paul F G Sims; Christopher M Grant; Claire E Eyers; Robert J Beynon; Simon J Hubbard Journal: Mol Cell Proteomics Date: 2016-01-10 Impact factor: 5.911
Authors: Yaqi Sun; Victoria M Harman; James R Johnson; Philip J Brownridge; Taiyu Chen; Gregory F Dykes; Yongjun Lin; Robert J Beynon; Lu-Ning Liu Journal: mBio Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 7.786