Literature DB >> 34495454

Student and pre-registration pharmacist performance in a UK Prescribing Assessment.

Ailsa Power1, Derek Stewart2, Gail Craig3, Anne Boyter4, Fiona Reid5, Fiona Stewart3, Scott Cunningham6, Simon Maxwell7.   

Abstract

Student and pre-registration pharmacist performance in a UK Prescribing Assessment': room for improvement and need for curricular change Background Increasingly the global policy direction is for patient-facing pharmacist prescribers. The 'UK Prescribing Safety Assessment' (PSA) was developed for medical graduates to demonstrate prescribing competencies in relation to the safe and effective use of medicines. Objectives To determine PSA performance of final year undergraduate student pharmacists (year 4) and pre-registration pharmacy graduates (year 5) and explore their opinions on its suitability. Setting Scotland, UK Methods Final year undergraduates (n = 238) and pre-registration pharmacists (n = 167) were briefed and undertook the PSA. PSA questions were mapped to specific thematic areas with 30 questions over 60 min. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics. A questionnaire was completed to gauge opinions on appropriateness of the PSA. Main Outcome Measure PSA scores Results Mean total PSA score for pre-registration pharmacists (64.4, SD 10) was significantly higher than for undergraduates (51.2, SD 12.0,) (p < 0.001). Pre-registration pharmacists performed significantly better across all question areas (all p < 0.001 other than 'adverse drug reactions', p < 0.01). Hospital pre-registration pharmacists performed statistically significantly better than community with higher overall scores (67.4, SD 9.8 v 63.2, SD 9.8, p < 0.05). Positive views on the appropriateness of the approach and the usability of the online interface were obtained from participants. Conclusion Hospital pre-registration pharmacists performed better than the undergraduates, but there is a need to improve prescribing skills in all, most notably in diagnostic skills. The PSA is acceptable to the participants. These results will help inform pharmacy curricula development and provides a cross-disciplinary method of assessment of prescribing competence.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Competency; Pharmacy education; Prescribing skills

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34495454     DOI: 10.1007/s11096-021-01317-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Pharm


  16 in total

Review 1.  Educating nonmedical prescribers.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Katie MacLure; Johnson George
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Prescribing safety: ensuring that new graduates are prepared.

Authors:  Simon R J Maxwell; Iain T Cameron; David J Webb
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Future perspectives on nonmedical prescribing.

Authors:  Derek Stewart; Tesnime Jebara; Scott Cunningham; Ahmed Awaisu; Abdulrouf Pallivalapila; Katie MacLure
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-02-01

Review 4.  A systematic review of the prevalence and incidence of prescribing errors with high-risk medicines in hospitals.

Authors:  M A Alanazi; M P Tully; P J Lewis
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 2.512

Review 5.  Nonmedical prescribing: where are we now?

Authors:  Louise C Cope; Aseel S Abuzour; Mary P Tully
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2016-04-29

6.  A global survey on trends in advanced practice and specialisation in the pharmacy workforce.

Authors:  Ian Bates; Lina R Bader; Kirsten Galbraith
Journal:  Int J Pharm Pract       Date:  2020-04

7.  Stakeholders' views and experiences of pharmacist prescribing: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tesnime Jebara; Scott Cunningham; Katie MacLure; Ahmed Awaisu; Abdulrouf Pallivalapila; Derek Stewart
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  What is the scale of prescribing errors committed by junior doctors? A systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Ross; Christine Bond; Helen Rothnie; Sian Thomas; Mary Joan Macleod
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 9.  Prevalence, incidence and nature of prescribing errors in hospital inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Penny J Lewis; Tim Dornan; David Taylor; Mary P Tully; Val Wass; Darren M Ashcroft
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 10.  A systematic review of the types and causes of prescribing errors generated from using computerized provider order entry systems in primary and secondary care.

Authors:  Clare L Brown; Helen L Mulcaster; Katherine L Triffitt; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Katie Reygate; Andrew K Husband; David W Bates; Sarah P Slight
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.