Literature DB >> 34494118

Disparities in Risks of Inadequate and Excessive Intake of Micronutrients during Pregnancy.

Katherine A Sauder1, Robyn N Harte1, Brandy M Ringham1, Patricia M Guenther2, Regan L Bailey3, Akram Alshawabkeh4, José F Cordero5, Anne L Dunlop6, Erin P Ferranti6, Amy J Elliott7, Diane C Mitchell8, Monique M Hedderson9, Lyndsay A Avalos9, Yeyi Zhu9, Carrie V Breton1, Leda Chatzi10, Jin Ran10, Irva Hertz-Picciotto11, Margaret R Karagas12, Vicki Sayarath12, Joseph Hoover13, Debra MacKenzie13, Kristen Lyall14, Rebecca J Schmidt11, Thomas G O'Connor15, Emily S Barrett16, Karen M Switkowski17, Sarah S Comstock18, Jean M Kerver19, Leonardo Trasande20, Frances A Tylavsky21, Rosalind J Wright22, Srimathi Kannan23, Noel T Mueller24, Diane J Catellier25, Deborah H Glueck1, Dana Dabelea1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate or excessive intake of micronutrients in pregnancy has potential to negatively impact maternal/offspring health outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare risks of inadequate or excessive micronutrient intake in diverse females with singleton pregnancies by strata of maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, and prepregnancy BMI.
METHODS: Fifteen observational cohorts in the US Environmental influences on Child Health Outcomes (ECHO) Consortium assessed participant dietary intake with 24-h dietary recalls (n = 1910) or food-frequency questionnaires (n = 7891) from 1999-2019. We compared the distributions of usual intake of 19 micronutrients from food alone (15 cohorts; n = 9801) and food plus dietary supplements (10 cohorts with supplement data; n = 7082) to estimate the proportion with usual daily intakes below their age-specific daily Estimated Average Requirement (EAR), above their Adequate Intake (AI), and above their Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL), overall and within sociodemographic and anthropometric subgroups.
RESULTS: Risk of inadequate intake from food alone ranged from 0% to 87%, depending on the micronutrient and assessment methodology. When dietary supplements were included, some women were below the EAR for vitamin D (20-38%), vitamin E (17-22%), and magnesium (39-41%); some women were above the AI for vitamin K (63-75%), choline (7%), and potassium (37-53%); and some were above the UL for folic acid (32-51%), iron (39-40%), and zinc (19-20%). Highest risks for inadequate intakes were observed among participants with age 14-18 y (6 nutrients), non-White race or Hispanic ethnicity (10 nutrients), less than a high school education (9 nutrients), or obesity (9 nutrients).
CONCLUSIONS: Improved diet quality is needed for most pregnant females. Even with dietary supplement use, >20% of participants were at risk of inadequate intake of ≥1 micronutrients, especially in some population subgroups. Pregnancy may be a window of opportunity to address disparities in micronutrient intake that could contribute to intergenerational health inequalities.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dietary Reference Intakes; diet; dietary supplements; micronutrients; minerals; pregnancy; vitamins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34494118      PMCID: PMC8564697          DOI: 10.1093/jn/nxab273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr        ISSN: 0022-3166            Impact factor:   4.687


  58 in total

1.  Dietary reference intakes: vitamin A, vitamin K, arsenic, boron, chromium, copper, iodine, iron, manganese, molybdenum, nickel, silicon, vanadium, and zinc.

Authors:  P Trumbo; A A Yates; S Schlicker; M Poos
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Socioeconomic disparities in adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Philip Blumenshine; Susan Egerter; Colleen J Barclay; Catherine Cubbin; Paula A Braveman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  A data-based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing.

Authors:  G Block; A M Hartman; C M Dresser; M D Carroll; J Gannon; L Gardner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Maternal choline supplementation during the third trimester of pregnancy improves infant information processing speed: a randomized, double-blind, controlled feeding study.

Authors:  Marie A Caudill; Barbara J Strupp; Laura Muscalu; Julie E H Nevins; Richard L Canfield
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Interactions between nutrition and environmental exposures: effects on health outcomes in women and children.

Authors:  Katarzyna Kordas; Bo Lönnerdal; Rebecca J Stoltzfus
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Maternal nutrition at conception modulates DNA methylation of human metastable epialleles.

Authors:  Paula Dominguez-Salas; Sophie E Moore; Maria S Baker; Andrew W Bergen; Sharon E Cox; Roger A Dyer; Anthony J Fulford; Yongtao Guan; Eleonora Laritsky; Matt J Silver; Gary E Swan; Steven H Zeisel; Sheila M Innis; Robert A Waterland; Andrew M Prentice; Branwen J Hennig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Estimation of Total Usual Dietary Intakes of Pregnant Women in the United States.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Susan G Pac; Victor L Fulgoni; Kathleen C Reidy; Patrick M Catalano
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-06-05

8.  Choline: Exploring the Growing Science on Its Benefits for Moms and Babies.

Authors:  Hunter W Korsmo; Xinyin Jiang; Marie A Caudill
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 5.717

9.  Magnesium Supplementation and Blood Pressure in Pregnancy: A Double-Blind Randomized Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Maria Bullarbo; Helena Mattson; Anna-Karin Broman; Natalia Ödman; Thorkild F Nielsen
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2018-05-29

10.  The Association Between Maternal Prenatal Fish Intake and Child Autism-Related Traits in the EARLI and HOME Studies.

Authors:  Rachel Vecchione; Chelsea Vigna; Casey Whitman; Elizabeth M Kauffman; Joseph M Braun; Aimin Chen; Yingying Xu; Ghassan B Hamra; Bruce P Lanphear; Kimberly Yolton; Lisa A Croen; M Daniele Fallin; Craig J Newschaffer; Kristen Lyall
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-02
View more
  5 in total

1.  Joint associations among prenatal metal mixtures and nutritional factors on birth weight z-score: Evidence from an urban U.S. population.

Authors:  Xueying Zhang; Yueh-Hsiu Mathilda Chiu; Srimathi Kannan; Whitney Cowell; Wenying Deng; Brent A Coull; Robert O Wright; Rosalind J Wright
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Women's health: optimal nutrition throughout the lifecycle.

Authors:  Edith J M Feskens; Regan Bailey; Zulfiqar Bhutta; Hans-Konrad Biesalski; Heather Eicher-Miller; Klaus Krämer; Wen-Harn Pan; James C Griffiths
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.865

3.  Sex Differences Across the Life Course: A Focus On Unique Nutritional and Health Considerations among Women.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Tieraona Low Dog; Abbie E Smith-Ryan; Sai Krupa Das; Fiona C Baker; Zeynep Madak-Erdogan; Billy R Hammond; Howard D Sesso; Alex Eapen; Susan H Mitmesser; Andrea Wong; Haiuyen Nguyen
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.687

Review 4.  Optimizing Maternal Nutrition: The Importance of a Tailored Approach.

Authors:  Lauren R Brink; Tonya M Bender; Rosalind Davies; Hanqi Luo; Derek Miketinas; Neil Shah; Nik Loveridge; Gabriele Gross; Neil Fawkes
Journal:  Curr Dev Nutr       Date:  2022-07-22

5.  Prenatal exposure to tobacco and adverse birth outcomes: effect modification by folate intake during pregnancy.

Authors:  Adrienne T Hoyt; Anna V Wilkinson; Peter H Langlois; Carol E Galeener; Nalini Ranjit; Katherine A Sauder; Dana M Dabelea; Brianna F Moore
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2022-09-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.