BACKGROUND: Studies in women of European descent showed an inverse association of dietary vitamin A (retinol and carotenoids) intake with breast cancer risks, mainly in premenopausal women. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether higher compared with lower levels of dietary vitamin A are associated with reduced breast cancer risks among Black women by estrogen receptor (ER) and menopausal statuses. METHODS: In this pooled analysis, data were from 3564 breast cancer cases and 11,843 controls (mean ages = 56.4 and 56.3 years, respectively) in the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium. Dietary intake was assessed by FFQs. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to estimate ORs and 95% CIs for study-specific quintiles of total vitamin A equivalents and individual carotenoids, and a pooled OR was estimated by a random-effect model. RESULTS: We observed an inverse association of total vitamin A equivalents with ER-positive breast cancer (quintiles 5 compared with 1: pooled OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-1.00; P-trend = 0.045). The association was seen among premenopausal women (pooled OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.83; P-trend = 0.004), but not among postmenopausal women (pooled OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.77-1.28; P-trend = 0.78). Additionally, there were inverse associations of dietary β-carotene (quintiles 5 compared with 1: pooled OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.95; P-trend = 0.08) and lutein (pooled OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45-0.87; P-trend = 0.020) with ER-positive breast cancer among premenopausal women. There was no evidence for an association of total vitamin A equivalents or individual carotenoids with ER-negative breast cancer, regardless of menopausal status. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings on dietary vitamin A and breast cancer risks in Black women are consistent with observations in women of European descent and advance the literature showing an inverse association for ER-positive disease.
BACKGROUND: Studies in women of European descent showed an inverse association of dietary vitamin A (retinol and carotenoids) intake with breast cancer risks, mainly in premenopausal women. OBJECTIVES: We examined whether higher compared with lower levels of dietary vitamin A are associated with reduced breast cancer risks among Black women by estrogen receptor (ER) and menopausal statuses. METHODS: In this pooled analysis, data were from 3564 breast cancer cases and 11,843 controls (mean ages = 56.4 and 56.3 years, respectively) in the African American Breast Cancer Epidemiology and Risk (AMBER) Consortium. Dietary intake was assessed by FFQs. Multivariable logistic regressions were performed to estimate ORs and 95% CIs for study-specific quintiles of total vitamin A equivalents and individual carotenoids, and a pooled OR was estimated by a random-effect model. RESULTS: We observed an inverse association of total vitamin A equivalents with ER-positive breast cancer (quintiles 5 compared with 1: pooled OR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.67-1.00; P-trend = 0.045). The association was seen among premenopausal women (pooled OR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.83; P-trend = 0.004), but not among postmenopausal women (pooled OR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.77-1.28; P-trend = 0.78). Additionally, there were inverse associations of dietary β-carotene (quintiles 5 compared with 1: pooled OR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.95; P-trend = 0.08) and lutein (pooled OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.45-0.87; P-trend = 0.020) with ER-positive breast cancer among premenopausal women. There was no evidence for an association of total vitamin A equivalents or individual carotenoids with ER-negative breast cancer, regardless of menopausal status. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings on dietary vitamin A and breast cancer risks in Black women are consistent with observations in women of European descent and advance the literature showing an inverse association for ER-positive disease.
Authors: A Heather Eliassen; Xiaomei Liao; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi; Shelley S Tworoger; Susan E Hankinson Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2015-04-15 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Xuehong Zhang; Donna Spiegelman; Laura Baglietto; Leslie Bernstein; Deborah A Boggs; Piet A van den Brandt; Julie E Buring; Susan M Gapstur; Graham G Giles; Edward Giovannucci; Gary Goodman; Susan E Hankinson; Kathy J Helzlsouer; Pamela L Horn-Ross; Manami Inoue; Seungyoun Jung; Polyna Khudyakov; Susanna C Larsson; Marie Lof; Marjorie L McCullough; Anthony B Miller; Marian L Neuhouser; Julie R Palmer; Yikyung Park; Kim Robien; Thomas E Rohan; Julie A Ross; Leo J Schouten; James M Shikany; Shoichiro Tsugane; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Alicja Wolk; Walter C Willett; Shumin M Zhang; Regina G Ziegler; Stephanie A Smith-Warner Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: D O Stram; J H Hankin; L R Wilkens; M C Pike; K R Monroe; S Park; B E Henderson; A M Nomura; M E Earle; F S Nagamine; L N Kolonel Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Shiriki K Kumanyika; David Mauger; Diane C Mitchell; Brenda Phillips; Helen Smiciklas-Wright; Julie R Palmer Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2003-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Geoffrey C Kabat; Mimi Kim; Lucile L Adams-Campbell; Bette J Caan; Rowan T Chlebowski; Marian L Neuhouser; James M Shikany; Thomas E Rohan Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Laura I Mignone; Edward Giovannucci; Polly A Newcomb; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Amy Trentham-Dietz; John M Hampton; Walter C Willett; Kathleen M Egan Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-06-15 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Julie R Palmer; Emma Viscidi; Melissa A Troester; Chi-Chen Hong; Pepper Schedin; Traci N Bethea; Elisa V Bandera; Virginia Borges; Craig McKinnon; Christopher A Haiman; Kathryn Lunetta; Laurence N Kolonel; Lynn Rosenberg; Andrew F Olshan; Christine B Ambrosone Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Meira Epplein; Yurii B Shvetsov; Lynne R Wilkens; Adrian A Franke; Robert V Cooney; Loïc Le Marchand; Brian E Henderson; Laurence N Kolonel; Marc T Goodman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2009-07-20 Impact factor: 6.466