| Literature DB >> 34493907 |
Sunder Ali Khowaja1, Parus Khuwaja2, Kapal Dev3, Giuseppe D'Aniello4.
Abstract
After affecting the world in unexpected ways, the virus has started mutating which is evident with the insurgence of its new variants. The governments, hospitals, schools, industries, and humans, in general, are looking for a potential solution in the vaccine which will eventually be available, but its timeline for eradicating the virus is yet unknown. Several researchers have encouraged and recommended the use of good practices such as physical healthcare monitoring, immunity boosting, personal hygiene, mental healthcare, and contact tracing for slowing down the spread of the virus. In this article, we propose the use of smart sensors integrated with the Internet of Medical Things to cover the spectrum of good practices in an automated manner. We present hypothetical frameworks for each of the good practice modules and propose the VIrus Resistance Framework using the Internet of Medical Things (VIRFIM) to tie all the individual modules in a unified architecture. Furthermore, we validate the realization of VIRFIM framework with two case studies related to physical activity monitoring and stress detection services. We envision that VIRFIM would be influential in assisting people with the new normal for current and future pandemics as well as instrumental in halting the economic losses, respectively. We also provide potential challenges and their probable solutions in compliance with the proposed VIRFIM.Entities:
Keywords: Data analytics; Deep learning; Internet of Medical Things; Pandemic
Year: 2021 PMID: 34493907 PMCID: PMC8412386 DOI: 10.1007/s00521-021-06434-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Comput Appl ISSN: 0941-0643 Impact factor: 5.102
List of some smartwatches embedded with wearable sensors
Fig. 1The physical healthcare monitoring module for patient monitoring during the isolation phase. ST Skin temperature, SpO2 oxygen saturation, PAM physical activity monitoring, AD anomaly detection
Fig. 2Personal hygiene and immunity boosting module for indoor and outdoor locations
Fig. 3Mental healthcare module for isolation and non-isolation phases
Fig. 4Contact tracing module based on the location, time, and travel history
Fig. 5Proposed VIrus Resistance Framework using the Internet of Medical Things (VIRFIM)
Search algorithm for service selection in VIRFIM framework
| Search algorithm | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Initializing pool of services |
| 2 | |
| 3 | For |
| 4 | |
| 5 | For |
| 6 | Check |
| 7 | IF sensor measurements available |
| 8 | Activate the service |
Predefined ontologies for location and high-level activities
Fig. 6Physical activity recognition for PAMAP2 dataset using VIRFIM
Classification accuracy and average inference time for activity recognition using various classification methods
| Classification method | Accuracy (%) | Average inference time |
|---|---|---|
| Decision trees (CART) | 69.34 | 0.23 ms |
| Support vector machines | 68.05 | 0.4 s |
| Random forests | 74.69 | 0.89 ms |
| Extreme learning machines | 82.47 | 0.44 ms |
| Extreme gradient boosting | 81.58 | 0.58 ms |
| 1-D CNN | 86.39 | 0.54 ms |
| LSTM | 88.42 | 0.82 ms |
| DeepSense | 88.57 | 1.36 s |
| DRBLSTM | 89.45 |
Classification accuracy and average inference time for stress detection using various classification methods
| Classification method | Accuracy (%) | Average inference time |
|---|---|---|
| Decision trees (CART) | 77.84 | > 0.1 ms |
| Support vector machines | 78.98 | 0.9 ms |
| Random forests | 79.56 | 0.43 ms |
| Extreme learning machines | 84.66 | 0.13 ms |
| Extreme gradient boosting | 78.75 | 0.27 ms |
| 1-D CNN | 92.57 | 0.29 ms |
| LSTM | 88.36 | 0.54 ms |
| DeepSense | 92.89 | 1.44 s |
| DRBLSTM | 93.66 | 1.13 s |
Fig. 7Stress recognition for the dataset collected in [41] using VIRFIM