| Literature DB >> 34489686 |
Violetta N Pivtoraiko1,2, Tamara Racic2, Eric E Abrahamson1,2, Victor L Villemagne3, Benjamin L Handen3, Ira T Lott4, Elizabeth Head5, Milos D Ikonomovic1,2,3.
Abstract
Individuals with Down syndrome (DS) have a genetic predisposition for amyloid-β (Aβ) overproduction and earlier onset of Aβ deposits compared to patients with sporadic late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD). Positron emission tomography (PET) with Pittsburgh Compound-B (PiB) detects fibrillar Aβ pathology in living people with DS and AD, but its relationship with heterogeneous Aβ forms aggregated within amyloid deposits is not well understood. We performed quantitative in vitro 3H-PiB binding assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays of fibrillar (insoluble) unmodified Aβ40 and Aβ42 forms and N-terminus truncated and pyroglutamate-modified AβNpE3-40 and AβNpE3-42 forms in postmortem frontal cortex and precuneus samples from 18 DS cases aged 43-63 years and 17 late-onset AD cases aged 62-99 years. Both diagnostic groups had frequent neocortical neuritic plaques, while the DS group had more severe vascular amyloid pathology (cerebral amyloid angiopathy, CAA). Compared to the AD group, the DS group had higher levels of Aβ40 and AβNpE3-40, while the two groups did not differ by Aβ42 and AβNpE3-42 levels. This resulted in lower ratios of Aβ42/Aβ40 and AβNpE3-42/AβNpE3-40 in the DS group compared to the AD group. Correlations of Aβ42/Aβ40 and AβNpE3-42/AβNpE3-40 ratios with CAA severity were strong in DS cases and weak in AD cases. Pyroglutamate-modified Aβ levels were lower than unmodified Aβ levels in both diagnostic groups, but within group proportions of both pyroglutamate-modified Aβ forms relative to both unmodified Aβ forms were lower in the DS group but not in the AD group. The two diagnostic groups did not differ by 3H-PiB binding levels. These results demonstrate that compared to late-onset AD cases, adult DS individuals with similar severity of neocortical neuritic plaques and greater CAA pathology have a preponderance of both pyroglutamate-modified AβNpE3-40 and unmodified Aβ40 forms. Despite the distinct molecular profile of Aβ forms and greater vascular amyloidosis in DS cases, cortical 3H-PiB binding does not distinguish between diagnostic groups that are at an advanced level of amyloid plaque pathology. This underscores the need for the development of CAA-selective PET radiopharmaceuticals to detect and track the progression of cerebral vascular amyloid deposits in relation to Aβ plaques in individuals with DS.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease; Down syndrome; Pittsburgh Compound-B; amyloid; cerebral amyloid angiopathy; default mode network; pyroglutamate
Year: 2021 PMID: 34489686 PMCID: PMC8416541 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.728739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Aging Neurosci ISSN: 1663-4365 Impact factor: 5.702
Demographic and neuropathological characteristics of Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease cases.
| Case code | Age (years) | Sex (M/F) | Neocortical neuritic plaques | Braak stage | CAA severity (frontal cortex) | CAA severity (precuneus cortex) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| DS-1 | 49 | M | Frequent | VI | None | None |
| DS-2 | 43 | M | Frequent | VI | None | None |
| DS-3 | 57 | F | Frequent | VI | None | Severe |
| DS-4 | 62 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | None |
| DS-5 | 45 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | Mild |
| DS-6 | 50 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | Mild |
| DS-7 | 57 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | Moderate |
| DS-8 | 55 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | Moderate |
| DS-9 | 52 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | Severe |
| DS-10 | 56 | M | Frequent | VI | Moderate | Mild |
| DS-11 | 56 | F | Frequent | VI | Moderate | Mild |
| DS-12 | 49 | M | Frequent | VI | Moderate | Mild |
| DS-13 | 55 | M | Frequent | VI | Moderate | Mild |
| DS-14 | 46 | M | Frequent | VI | Moderate | Moderate |
| DS-15 | 50 | F | Frequent | VI | Severe | Moderate |
| DS-16 | 63 | F | Frequent | VI | Severe | Moderate |
| DS-17 | 58 | M | Frequent | VI | Severe | Severe |
| DS-18 | 54 | M | Frequent | VI | Severe | Severe |
|
| ||||||
| AD-1 | 85 | M | Frequent | III/IV | None | None |
| AD-2 | 89 | F | Frequent | VI | None | None |
| AD-3 | 91 | M | Frequent | V | None | None |
| AD-4 | 77 | M | Frequent | VI | None | Mild |
| AD-5 | 74 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | None |
| AD-6 | 67 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | None |
| AD-7 | 99 | M | Frequent | V | Mild | None |
| AD-8 | 82 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | None |
| AD-9 | 91 | F | Frequent | VI | Mild | None |
| AD-10 | 85 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | Mild |
| AD-11 | 62 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | Mid |
| AD-12 | 79 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | Mild |
| AD-13 | 84 | M | Frequent | VI | Mild | Moderate |
| AD-14 | 77 | M | Frequent | VI | Moderate | None |
| AD-15 | 88 | M | Frequent | V | Moderate | Mild |
| AD-16 | 72 | M | Frequent | VI | Severe | Moderate |
| AD-17 | 76 | M | Frequent | V | Severe | Severe |
Figure 13H-PiB binding levels in tissue homogenates of the frontal cortex (FC) and precuneus (PreC) obtained postmortem from individuals with Down syndrome (DS) or Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Individual data points and group medians with 95% confidence intervals are illustrated in the graphs. Data were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post test.
Comparisons of 3H-PiB, unmodified Aβ, pryoglutamate modified Aβ, and ratios of Aβ forms across groups/regions and with each other.
| Variable | Down syndrome (frontal cortex) | Alzheimer’s disease (frontal cortex) | Down syndrome (precuneus) | Alzheimer’s disease (precuneus) | Kruskal–Wallis statistic and | Pairwise comparisons ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3H-PiB binding | 152.2 ± 55.60 (161.4) | 158.5 ± 59.94 (156.6) | 135.1 ± 63.1 (134.9) | 143.4 ± 60.86 (130.4) | 1.35, | n.s. | |
| Aβ42 | 1,428 ± 373.2 (1,454) | 1,274 ± 411.5 (1,252) | 1,461 ± 534.3 (1,454) | 1,119 ± 549.8 (919.5) | 6.39, | n.s. | |
| Aβ40 | 2,868 ± 2,940 (1,337) | 655.5 ± 893.0 (104.6) | 5,149 ± 6,091 (2,261) | 227.5 ± 404.5 (48.23) | 28.46, | FC-DS, PreC-DS > FC-AD, PreC-AD | |
| AβNpE3-42 | 94.37 ± 14.97 (91.74) | 90.5 ± 21.22 (90.49) | 87.28 ± 16.22 (86.46) | 81.25 ± 31.22 (83.25) | 4.33, | n.s. | |
| AβNpE3-40 | 173 ± 208.3 (51.63) | 33.26 ± 49.25 (8.38) | 122.1 ± 147 (48.71) | 33.1 ± 55.48 (5.88) | 15.08, | FC-DS, PreC-DS > FC-AD, PreC-AD | |
| Kruskal | #x02013;Wallis statistic and | 47.65, | 32.63, | 41.83, | 36.40, | ||
| Pairwise comparisons ( | Aβ42, Aβ40 > AβNpE3-42, AβNpE3-40 | Aβ42 > Aβ40, AβNpE3-42, AβNpE3-40; Aβ40, AβNpE3-42 > AβNpE3-40 | Aβ42, Aβ40 > AβNpE3-42, AβNpE3-40 | Aβ42 > Aβ40, AβNpE3-40, AβNpE3-42; Aβ40, AβNpE3-42 > AβNpE3-40 | |||
| Aβ42/Aβ40 | 1.69 ± 1.82 (1.04) | 13.29 ± 17.29 (4.0) | 2.05 ± 3.05 (0.54) | 43.44 ± 51.0 (13.95) | 20.73, | FC-DS, PreC-DS > FC-AD, PreC-AD | |
| AβNpE3-42/AβNpE3-40 | 2.69 ± 3.05 (1.68) | 18.98 ± 19.32 (12.61) | 4.554 ± 6.939 (1.095) | 29.37 ± 29.07 (10.12) | 13.36, | FC-DS, PreC-DS > FC-AD, PreC-AD | |
| Aβ42/AβNpE3-42 | 16.01 ± 2.12 (15.86) | 13.92 ± 4.40 (13.51) | 15.83 ± 4.22 (15.11) | 14.50 ± 8.37 (11.30) | 10.0, | FC-DS > FC-AD, PreC-AD PreC-DS > FC-AD | |
| Aβ40/AβNpE3-40 | 25.73 ± 30.43 (18.72) | 15.69 ± 10.38 (13.02) | 71.43 ± 153.7 (33.16) | 10.19 ± 11.96 (8.48) | 28.46, | FC-DS > PreC-AD; PreC-DS > FC-AD, PreC-AD |
Horizontal comparisons: AβNpE3-40, AβNpE3-42, and the AβNpE3-42/AβNpE3-40 ratio, Aβ40, Aβ42, and the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, and .
Figure 2The concentration of Aβ42 (A), Aβ40 (B), AβNpE3-42 (C), and AβNpE3-40 (D) in tissue homogenates of the frontal cortex (FC) and precuneus (PreC) obtained postmortem from individuals with Down syndrome (DS) or Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Individual data points and group medians with 95% confidence intervals are illustrated in the graphs. The y-axis in panels B and D have been log transformed to better illustrate the spread of individual data points. Data were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post test. Significant differences between the two groups that were identified by the post test are indicated by brackets and asterisks. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.
Figure 3Ratios of unmodified Aβ42/Aβ40 (A) and pyroglutamate AβNpE3-42/NpE3–40 (B), and ratios of unmodified and pyroglutamate forms of Aβ ending at amino acid 42 (C) or at amino acid 40 (D) in tissue homogenates of the frontal cortex (FC) and precuneus (PreC) obtained postmortem from individuals with Down syndrome (DS) and Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Individual data points and group medians with 95% confidence intervals are illustrated in the graphs. The y-axis in panels A, B, and D have been log transformed to better illustrate the spread of individual data points. The data were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance with Dunn’s multiple comparisons post test. Significant differences between the two groups that were identified by the post test are indicated by brackets and asterisks. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.01; ****P < 0.0001.
Associations of unmodified Aβ levels with pyroglutamate-modified Aβ levels, both Aβ forms with 3H-PiB binding levels, and both Aβ forms with CAA severity in Down syndrome and Alzheimer’s disease groups.
| Comparison/Group | Down syndrome | Alzheimer’s disease |
|---|---|---|
| Unmodified Aβ to pyroglutamate-modified Aβ (same | ||
| Aβ42 and AβNpE3-42 |
|
|
| Aβ40 and AβNpE3-40 |
|
|
| Aβ forms to 3H-PiB | ||
| Aβ42 and 3H-PiB |
|
|
| Aβ40 and 3H-PiB | 0.2825 (0.1055) | −0.0097 (0.9588) |
| AβNpE3-42 and 3H-PiB |
|
|
| AβNpE3-40 and 3H-PiB |
| −0.0269 (0.8877) |
| Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and 3H-PiB | −0.2610 (0.1360) | 0.2717 (0.1704) |
| AβNpE3-42/AβNpE3-40 and 3H-PiB |
| 0.0631 (0.7452) |
| Aβ forms and 3H-PiB to CAA severity | ||
| Aβ42 and CAA severity |
| −0.2090 (0.2766) |
| Aβ40 and CAA severity | 0.7786 (<0.0001) |
|
| AβNpE3-42 and CAA severity |
|
|
| AβNpE3-40 and CAA severity |
|
|
| Aβ42/Aβ40 and CAA severity |
|
|
| AβNpE3-42/AβNpE3-40 and CAA severity |
|
|
| 3H-PiB and CAA severity |
| −0.0419 (0.8141) |
For each correlation analysis, data from the frontal cortex and the precuneus were combined. The Spearman rank order correlation test was used to examine associations among variables. Associations meeting criteria for significance (.