Jianqiao Yang1, Zixiao Wang2, Kangdi Dong3, Ronghua Zhang3, Kun Xiao3, Liang Shang1,3,4, Leping Li1,3,4. 1. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 2. Department of Basic Medicine, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 3. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 4. Key Laboratory of Engineering of Shandong Province, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Jinan, Shandong, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical value of indocyanine green (ICG) in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy remains controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICG fluorescence imaging-guided radical gastrectomy. METHODS: All relevant studies published until 30 October 2020 were retrieved from several databases. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to analyze the results based on different heterogeneity levels. Data were expressed as odds ratios or weighted mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system scale was used for quality of evidence evaluation. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included six cohort studies that investigated 622 patients. Compared with conventional radical gastrectomy, ICG fluorescence imaging-guided gastrectomy facilitates complete lymph node dissection, reduces intraoperative blood loss, and shortens the length of postoperative hospitalization. Moreover, we observed no significant intergroup differences in the operative time, first exhaust time, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: ICG fluorescence imaging-guided radical gastrectomy scores over conventional gastrectomy and appears to be a promising approach in patients who require radical gastrectomy. However, further research is warranted to explore the potential long-term survival benefit of ICG fluorescence imaging in patients with gastric cancer.
BACKGROUND: The clinical value of indocyanine green (ICG) in laparoscopic radical gastrectomy remains controversial. We performed this meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of ICG fluorescence imaging-guided radical gastrectomy. METHODS: All relevant studies published until 30 October 2020 were retrieved from several databases. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to analyze the results based on different heterogeneity levels. Data were expressed as odds ratios or weighted mean differences along with 95% confidence intervals. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system scale was used for quality of evidence evaluation. RESULTS: This meta-analysis included six cohort studies that investigated 622 patients. Compared with conventional radical gastrectomy, ICG fluorescence imaging-guided gastrectomy facilitates complete lymph node dissection, reduces intraoperative blood loss, and shortens the length of postoperative hospitalization. Moreover, we observed no significant intergroup differences in the operative time, first exhaust time, and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: ICG fluorescence imaging-guided radical gastrectomy scores over conventional gastrectomy and appears to be a promising approach in patients who require radical gastrectomy. However, further research is warranted to explore the potential long-term survival benefit of ICG fluorescence imaging in patients with gastric cancer.