| Literature DB >> 34487903 |
Jiayuan Wang1, Abosede Sarah Alli1, Sierra Clark2, Allison Hughes3, Majid Ezzati4, Andrew Beddows5, Jose Vallarino6, James Nimo3, Josephine Bedford-Moses3, Solomon Baah3, George Owusu7, Ernest Agyemang8, Frank Kelly9, Benjamin Barratt9, Sean Beevers10, Samuel Agyei-Mensah8, Jill Baumgartner11, Michael Brauer12, Raphael E Arku13.
Abstract
Economic and urban development in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) may be shifting the dominant air pollution sources in cities from biomass to road traffic. Considered as a marker for traffic-related air pollution in cities, we conducted a city-wide measurement of NOx levels in the Accra Metropolis and examined their spatiotemporal patterns in relation to land use and meteorological factors. Between April 2019 to June 2020, we collected weekly integrated NOx (n = 428) and NO2 (n = 472) samples at 10 fixed (year-long) and 124 rotating (week-long) sites. Data from the same time of year were compared to a previous study (2006) to assess changes in NO2 concentrations. NO and NO2 concentrations were highest in commercial/business/industrial (66 and 76 μg/m3, respectively) and high-density residential areas (47 and 59 μg/m3, respectively), compared with peri-urban locations. We observed annual means of 68 and 70 μg/m3 for NO and NO2, and a clear seasonal variation, with the mean NO2 of 63 μg/m3 (non-Harmattan) increased by 25-56% to 87 μg/m3 (Harmattan) across different site types. The NO2/NOx ratio was also elevated by 19-28%. Both NO and NO2 levels were associated with indicators of road traffic emissions (e.g. distance to major roads), but not with community biomass use (e.g. wood and charcoal). We found strong correlations between both NO2 and NO2/NOx and mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation and water vapor mixing ratio. These findings represent an increase of 25-180% when compared to a small study conducted in two high-density residential neighborhoods in Accra in 2006. Road traffic may be replacing community biomass use (major source of fine particulate matter) as the prominent source of air pollution in Accra, with policy implication for growing cities in SSA.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Ghana; Harmattan; Incident solar radiation; Meteorology; Mixing layer depth; Nitrogen oxides; Sub-Saharan Africa; Traffic
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34487903 PMCID: PMC7611659 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149931
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963
Figure 1Location of the sampling sites and annual concentrations of (A) NO and (B) NO2 across the GAMA. The colors of NO2 concentrations indicate comparison to the WHO annual guideline of 40 μg/m3. The concentrations at the fixed sites represent annual mean values, and the rotating sites represent season-adjusted mean values (i.e. an estimated annual means). Major and secondary road network were from OpenStreetMap (downloaded in 2019). Biomass use data and the GAMA boundaries were from Ghana Statistical Service (2010 Census).
Weekly integrated NO, NO2, NOx concentrations (μg/m3), and NO/NOx ratio at all rotating sites by site type.
| City region | Measureme | NO | NO2 | NOx | NO/NOx | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | n | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | Mean (SD) | Range | Mean (SD) | Range | |
| GAMA | All sites | 124 | 38 (26) | 6 – 169 | 48 (26) | 9 – 139 | 82 (45) | 29 – 297 | 0.46 (0.10) | 0.19 – 0.79 |
| CBI | 23 | 66 (40) | 25 – 169 | 76 (25) | 46 – 139 | 134 (61) | 81 – 297 | 0.47 (0.09) | 0.31 – 0.57 | |
| HD | 32 | 44 (22) | 19 – 110 | 56 (21) | 20 – 93 | 100 (38) | 41 – 180 | 0.44 (0.07) | 0.33 – 0.63 | |
| LD | 42 | 33 (19) | 12 – 94 | 43 (18) | 10 – 100 | 73 (33) | 30 – 173 | 0.45 (0.11) | 0.28 – 0.79 | |
| UB | 27 | 23 (5) | 6 – 30 | 24 (11) | 9 – 62 | 48 (12) | 29 – 82 | 0.49 (0.12) | 0.19 – 0.71 | |
| AMA | All sites | 44 | 47 (30) | 19 – 131 | 64 (26) | 20 – 139 | 102 (48) | 41 – 232 | 0.44 (0.12) | 0.28 – 0.79 |
| TMA | All sites | 16 | 44 (22) | 24 – 92 | 51 (15) | 28 – 89 | 96 (35) | 53 – 182 | 0.45 (0.07) | 0.33 – 0.57 |
| Other | All sites | 64 | 31 (22) | 6 – 169 | 36 (21) | 9 – 126 | 67 (41) | 29 – 297 | 0.47 (0.10) | 0.19 – 0.71 |
Other municipalities in the GAMA beside AMA and TMA.
Figure 2Distribution of NOx (NOx = NO + NO2) concentrations by site-type.
(A) Site-specific values at each rotating site. (B) Median and interquartile range values. The dash lines are the WHO guideline for annual NO2 concentrations of 40 ug/m3.
Weekly integrated NO, NO2, NOx concentrations (μg/m3), and NO/NOx ratio at the fixed (year-long) sites by site type and season.
| Site | Period | NO | NO2 | NOx | NO/NOx | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | Range | Mean (SD) | Range | Mean | Range | Mean | Range | ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Harmattan | 59 (41) | 4 – 165 | 87 (35) | 19 – 199 | 147 (69) | 43 – 333 | 0.37 (0.13) | 0.1 – 0.66 | |
| Non-Harmattan | 72 (56) | 0.4 – 238 | 63 (29) | 8 – 150 | 136 (81) | 16 – 359 | 0.49 (0.12) | 0.01 – 0.84 | |
| Pre-lockdown | 70 (52) | 4 – 238 | 72 (32) | 11 – 199 | 144 (76) | 28 – 354 | 0.45 (0.14) | 0.10 – 0.84 | |
| Covid-19 lockdown | 39 (41) | 6.7 – 153 | 39 (29) | 7.5 – 112 | 78 (68) | 16 – 265 | 0.47 (0.10) | 0.30 – 0.71 | |
| Post-lockdown | 68 (51) | 0.4 – 208 | 68 (32) | 18 – 150 | 137 (80) | 36 – 358 | 0.47 (0.11) | 0.01 – 0.65 | |
| CBI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Harmattan | 107 (33) | 52 – 165 | 123 (25) | 90 – 199 | 229 (40) | 176 – 333 | 0.46 (0.09) | 0.24 – 0.64 | |
| Non-Harmattan | 134 (54) | 17 – 238 | 92 (23) | 30 – 150 | 228 (70) | 48 – 359 | 0.57 (0.09) | 0.32 – 0.78 | |
| Pre-lockdown | 130 (47) | 52 – 238 | 104 (24) | 58 – 199 | 236 (51) | 151 – 354 | 0.55 (0.11) | 0.24 – 0.78 | |
| Covid-19 lockdown | 73 (54) | 17 – 153 | 64 (34) | 30 – 112 | 136 (86) | 48 – 265 | 0.50 (0.09) | 0.35 – 0.6 | |
| Post-lockdown | 126 (55) | 32 – 208 | 99 (28) | 66 – 150 | 225 (78) | 101 – 359 | 0.54 (0.1) | 0.32 – 0.65 | |
| HD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Harmattan | 38 (11) | 13 – 56 | 85 (16) | 57 – 127 | 123 (20) | 94 – 165 | 0.31 (0.07) | 0.14 – 0.46 | |
| Non-Harmattan | 46 (11) | 18 – 75 | 64 (16) | 25 – 97 | 113 (21) | 43 – 160 | 0.42 (0.07) | 0.19 – 0.67 | |
| Pre-lockdown | 45 (12) | 13 – 75 | 72 (16) | 37 – 127 | 119 (15) | 94 – 165 | 0.38 (0.1) | 0.14 – 0.67 | |
| Covid-19 lockdown | 19 (2) | 18 – 21 | 25 (0.6) | 25 – 25 | 44 (2) | 43 – 45 | 0.43 (0.03) | 0.41 – 0.46 | |
| Post-lockdown | 46 (11) | 32 – 69 | 66 (18) | 35 – 90 | 112 (28) | 67 – 160 | 0.41 (0.04) | 0.35 – 0.47 | |
| LD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Harmattan | 47 (29) | 8 – 108 | 75 (27) | 27 – 132 | 122 (50) | 56 – 221 | 0.36 (0.12) | 0.11 – 0.56 | |
| Non-Harmattan | 51 (34) | 7 – 158 | 49 (20) | 9 – 100 | 100 (48) | 16 – 206 | 0.48 (0.13) | 0.12 – 0.84 | |
| Pre-lockdown | 51 (33) | 8 – 158 | 58 (25) | 12 – 132 | 111 (50) | 28 – 221 | 0.44 (0.15) | 0.11 – 0.84 | |
| Covid-19 lockdown | 22 (16) | 7 – 57 | 31 (16) | 9 – 56 | 53 (31) | 16 – 113 | 0.40 (0.07) | 0.3 – 0.51 | |
| Post-lockdown | 48 (26) | 18 – 110 | 55 (23) | 18 – 100 | 103 (47) | 36 – 206 | 0.46 (0.07) | 0.36 – 0.59 | |
| UB |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Harmattan | 16 (11) | 4 – 37 | 35 (9) | 19 – 52 | 51 (6) | 43 – 60 | 0.31 (0.18) | 0.1 – 0.66 | |
| Non-Harmattan | 22 (8) | 0.4 – 37 | 26 (10) | 8 – 54 | 48 (11) | 18 – 70 | 0.46 (0.15) | 0.01 – 0.74 | |
| Pre-lockdown | 20 (9) | 4 – 37 | 29 (9) | 11 – 52 | 49 (7) | 38 – 70 | 0.40 (0.16) | 0.1 – 0.74 | |
| Covid-19 lockdown | 20 (10) | 10 – 30 | 14 (10) | 8 – 25 | 34 (19) | 18 – 55 | 0.61 (0.09) | 0.55 – 0.71 | |
| Post-lockdown | 22 (12) | 0 – 31 | 34 (12) | 20 – 54 | 57 (6) | 48 – 63 | 0.39 (0.22) | 0.01 – 0.59 | |
Figure 3Time series of (A) NO, (B) NO2 concentrations, and (C) NO2/NOx ratios at the fixed (year-long) measurement sites and grouped by site-type. The pilot data was excluded in the figure. The points represent individual weekly integrated samples and the lines represent the smoothed trend (method = “loess”) with their standard errors. The black line in (B) represents the WHO guideline for annual NO2 concentrations of 40 ug/m3.
* The field campaign was briefly suspended over the Christmas holidays and also for mid-campaign QA/QC as described in our protocol,[32] which likely biased our annual mean results downward.
** There was missing data due to COVID-19 lockdown of Accra between March and April 2020 as well as mandatory quarantine for the field team through contact tracing.
Figure 4Relationship of weekly averaged mixing layer depth (A and B), incident solar radiation (C and D) and water vapor mixing ratio (MR) (E and F) with NO2 concentrations and NO2/NOx ratios. The mixing layer depth, incident solar radiation and water vapor mixing ratio data were calculated through Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) 4 model (https://www.arl.noaa.gov/hysplit/hysplit/).
Figure 5Distribution of pre-, during-, and post-COVID-19 lockdown (A) NO and (B) NO2 concentrations at the fixed (year-long) sites by site-type. The points in the box represent the mean values. Each box shows the median value (inside line), 25th (lower), and 75th (upper) percentile of the data, and the lines extending from the boxes (whiskers) indicate variability outside the upper and lower quartiles. The dash line in (B) show the WHO guideline for annual NO2 concentrations (40 ug/m3).