Helen Burton Murray1, Fengqing Zhang2, Stephanie M Manasse3, Evan M Forman2, Meghan L Butryn2, Adrienne S Juarascio2. 1. Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Electronic address: hbmurray@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. 3. Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ) was developed to measure psychological flexibility around food-related internal experiences (e.g., thoughts, feelings, urges) and has two subscales, acceptance and willingness. However, the FAAQ factor structure has not yet been systematically validated with a clinically relevant sample. METHODS: Two weight-loss treatment seeking samples (total N = 462; 80.4% female) ages 18 to 70 (M = 52.6, SD = 9.8) completed the FAAQ before and after group-based treatment of overweight or obesity. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis on the FAAQ's previously observed two-factor model produced poor model fit. An alternative 7-item model removing specific items that contributed to poor fit and were conceptually relevant to remove provided good model fit. The resulting revised 7-item FAAQ (items 1,3,6 removed) had adequate internal consistency and significant predictive validity for the Total score and subscales, and showed initial construct validity for the Total score. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest researchers and clinicians should now use the 7-item FAAQ-II, which retains the Willingness and Acceptance subscales. Future research is needed with other relevant samples to confirm the FAAQ-II's factor structure and psychometric properties.
OBJECTIVE: The Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ) was developed to measure psychological flexibility around food-related internal experiences (e.g., thoughts, feelings, urges) and has two subscales, acceptance and willingness. However, the FAAQ factor structure has not yet been systematically validated with a clinically relevant sample. METHODS: Two weight-loss treatment seeking samples (total N = 462; 80.4% female) ages 18 to 70 (M = 52.6, SD = 9.8) completed the FAAQ before and after group-based treatment of overweight or obesity. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis on the FAAQ's previously observed two-factor model produced poor model fit. An alternative 7-item model removing specific items that contributed to poor fit and were conceptually relevant to remove provided good model fit. The resulting revised 7-item FAAQ (items 1,3,6 removed) had adequate internal consistency and significant predictive validity for the Total score and subscales, and showed initial construct validity for the Total score. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest researchers and clinicians should now use the 7-item FAAQ-II, which retains the Willingness and Acceptance subscales. Future research is needed with other relevant samples to confirm the FAAQ-II's factor structure and psychometric properties.
Authors: Frank W Bond; Steven C Hayes; Ruth A Baer; Kenneth M Carpenter; Nigel Guenole; Holly K Orcutt; Tom Waltz; Robert D Zettle Journal: Behav Ther Date: 2011-05-25
Authors: Meghan L Butryn; Danielle Arigo; Greer A Raggio; Alison Infield Kaufman; Stephanie G Kerrigan; Evan M Forman Journal: J Phys Act Health Date: 2014-08-07
Authors: Michael R Lowe; Meghan L Butryn; Elizabeth R Didie; Rachel A Annunziato; J Graham Thomas; Canice E Crerand; Christopher N Ochner; Maria C Coletta; Dara Bellace; Matthew Wallaert; Jason Halford Journal: Appetite Date: 2009-06-12 Impact factor: 3.868