A M Cohen1, K Braun1, N Hübner1, P V Scherner1, H B Jurkat2. 1. Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Fachbereich Medizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Friedrichstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. 2. Klinik für Psychosomatik und Psychotherapie, Fachbereich Medizin, Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen, Friedrichstraße 33, 35392, Gießen, Deutschland. Harald.Jurkat@psycho.med.uni-giessen.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to high levels of stress, a practical course on stress management in medical school was offered to preclinical medical students at the Justus-Liebig University in Giessen up to 2019. In addition to autogenic training with specific resolution formulas, learning strategies, examination anxiety, and stress management were taught. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the factors influencing the efficacy of the course as well as predictive factors favoring the success of preventive strategies for medical students. METHODS: A total of 81 medical students with an average age of M = 25.4 years participated in this study, with 32.1% being male. The pre-post surveys were conducted anonymously with PSQ, BDI, PHQ‑9, HADS, SF-12 and the STQL‑S. RESULTS: With respect to satisfaction, stress, anxiety, and depression, a significant improvement was achieved at high effect levels (Cohen's d > 1). Initially, 35% of the students suffered from clinically relevant depression; these also showed a significantly higher stress level at the end of the course. This also applies to students with low study or life satisfaction. There were significant interactions of stress reduction depending on the existence of adequate learning techniques as well as anxiety symptoms but less often due to the existence of adequate stress management strategies. CONCLUSION: As predictive factors against a high stress level in medical students, a high study satisfaction and a high life satisfaction as well as low depression values could be confirmed. Relevant factors contributing to the efficacy of the course are learning strategies and coping with examination phobia. Theoretical information concerning stress management was found to be less helpful.
BACKGROUND: Due to high levels of stress, a practical course on stress management in medical school was offered to preclinical medical students at the Justus-Liebig University in Giessen up to 2019. In addition to autogenic training with specific resolution formulas, learning strategies, examination anxiety, and stress management were taught. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the factors influencing the efficacy of the course as well as predictive factors favoring the success of preventive strategies for medical students. METHODS: A total of 81 medical students with an average age of M = 25.4 years participated in this study, with 32.1% being male. The pre-post surveys were conducted anonymously with PSQ, BDI, PHQ‑9, HADS, SF-12 and the STQL‑S. RESULTS: With respect to satisfaction, stress, anxiety, and depression, a significant improvement was achieved at high effect levels (Cohen's d > 1). Initially, 35% of the students suffered from clinically relevant depression; these also showed a significantly higher stress level at the end of the course. This also applies to students with low study or life satisfaction. There were significant interactions of stress reduction depending on the existence of adequate learning techniques as well as anxiety symptoms but less often due to the existence of adequate stress management strategies. CONCLUSION: As predictive factors against a high stress level in medical students, a high study satisfaction and a high life satisfaction as well as low depression values could be confirmed. Relevant factors contributing to the efficacy of the course are learning strategies and coping with examination phobia. Theoretical information concerning stress management was found to be less helpful.
Authors: Jocelyn H Schiller; R Brent Stansfield; David C Belmonte; Joel A Purkiss; Rishindra M Reddy; Joseph B House; Sally A Santen Journal: Teach Learn Med Date: 2017-07-28 Impact factor: 2.414
Authors: Niko Kohls; Arndt Büssing; Sebastian Sauer; Janosch Rieß; Christina Ulrich; Anke Vetter; Harald Bernhard Jurkat Journal: Z Psychosom Med Psychother Date: 2012 Impact factor: 0.791