| Literature DB >> 34487062 |
Vincenzo De Sanctis1, Ashraf Soliman2, Suhair Elsiddig3, Fawziya Alyafei4, Nada Alaaraj5, Maya Itani6, Celine Jour7, Ahmed Elawwa8.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This controlled trial investigated the effects of energy-dense pediatric oral nutritional supplements ONS versus standard ONS in pediatric patients requiring oral nutritional support for low body mass index (BMI) or weight gain per day (WGD) below the average for age and sex. Patients andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34487062 PMCID: PMC8477105 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v92i4.11868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Biomed ISSN: 0392-4203
Nutritional composition of the ONS (cONS versus sONS)
|
|
|
|
| Energy, Kcal | 300 | 200 |
| Energy density, Kcal/ml | 1.5 | 1 |
| Protein, g | 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Carbohydrate, g | 37.6 | 23.6 |
| Fat, g | 13.6 | 9 |
| Osmolality. mOsmo/kg | 350-595 | 230 |
Anthropometric data of children on oral nutritional supplementation [high caloric density (cONS) vs standard caloric density (sONS)]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8.94 ± 4.84 | 10.1 ± 3.82 | NS | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
| -2.25 ± 0.82 | -2.3 ± 0.67 | NS | -1.99 ± 0.77 | -2.05 ± 0.59 | NS | -1.735* ± 0.76 | -1.84 | NS |
|
| -0.43 ± 0.72 | -1.09 ± 0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| -1.08 ± 0.54 | -1.32 ± 0.41 | NS | -1.24 ± 0.58 | -0.98 | NS | -1.19 ± 0.59 | -1.15 ± 0.40 | NS |
|
| -1.09 ± 1.28 | - 0.4 ± 1.82 |
| 0.36* ± 1.29 | 0.08 | NS | 1.168* ± 0.83 | 1.31 | NS |
|
|
|
|
| 0.27 ± 0.55 | 0.08 ± 0.28 | NS | 0.52* ± 0.43 | 0.48 | NS |
|
|
|
|
| -0.16 ± 0.29 | 0.34 |
| -0.11 ± 0.34 | 0.17 |
|
|
| 5.20 ± 2.10 | 4.50 ± 1.80 | NS | 8.65 ± 3.98 | 14.13* ± 7.78 |
| 9.85 ± 4.71 | 11.6* ± 6.58 | NS |
|
| -0.6 ± 0.3 | -0.48 ± 0.5 | NS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 0.35 | 1.5* ± 0.6 |
|
HT standing height SDS mid parental height SDS; body mass index SDS; growth velocity/year SDS; weight gain per day; : Insulin growth factor- 1 SDS; p<0.05 after vs before oral nutritional supplementation (ONS).
Figure 1.Correlation between heigh growth velocity/year (GV/yr) and weight gain per day (WGD) after nutritional supplements (ONS) (r= 0.31; P:0.01).
Correlations between weight gain per day (WGD) and linear growth parameters after starting oral nutritional supplementation (ONS)
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1.00 | |||
|
| 0.31* | 1.00 | ||
|
| 0.19 | 0.83* | 1.00 | |
|
| 0.19 | 0.32* | 0.29 | 1.00 |
weight gain per day; growth velocity/year; growth velocity/year SDS standing height SDS P <0.05.
Figure 2.Correlation between IGF 1-SDS and height growth velocity (GV:cm/yr) (r= 0.427; P:0.003).
Figure 3.Correlation between IGF 1-SDS and body mass index SDS (BMI-SDS) (r= 0.356; P:0.015).
Correlations between IGF1- SDS and linear growth parameters
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 1 | |||||
|
| -0.01829 | 1 | ||||
|
| 0.103232 | 0.107725 | 1 | |||
|
| 0.090506 | 0.113137 | 0.142 | 1 | ||
|
| 0.334585* | 0.142922 | 0.051 | 0.57* | 1 | |
|
| 0.243258 | 0.070208 | 0.356* | 0.42* | 0.23* | 1 |
standing height SDS body mass index; body mass index; growth velocity/year; growth velocity/year SDS; Insulin growth factor 1 SDS P <0.05.
Figure 4.Correlation between body mass index SDS (BMI-SDS) and standing height SDS (HtSDS) after oral nutritional supplements (ONS) for 1 year (r= 0.45; P:0.031).
Figure 5.Effects of oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) on IGF-1 and growth