Zulfiqar A Bhutta1,2, Faisal Sultan3, Aamer Ikram4, Adil Haider5, Assad Hafeez6, Muhammad Islam2. 1. Institute for Global Health & Development, The Aga Khan University, South-Central Asia, East Africa & United Kingdom, Karachi, Pakistan. 2. Centre for Global Child Health, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. 3. Shaukat Khanum Memorial Hospital & Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. 4. The National Institute of Health, Islamabad, Pakistan. 5. The Aga Khan University Medical College & Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. 6. Health Services Academy, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the world in an unprecedented manner and South Asian countries were among the first to experience imported cases. Pakistan's response to COVID-19 has been under scrutiny for its granularity, reach and impact. AIMS: to evaluate objectively the chronology and depth of the response to COVID-19 in Pakistan. METHODS: We evaluated available national and subnational epidemiological and burden information on COVID-19 cases and deaths in Pakistan, including projection models available to the Government at an early stage of the pandemic. RESULTS: Pakistan, with a population of 215 million and considerable geographic diversity, experienced case introduction from pilgrims returning from the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by widespread community transmission. The National Command and Operations Centre, established through civilian and military partnership, was critical in fast tracking logistics, information gathering, real-time reporting and smart lockdowns, coupled with a massive cash support programme targeting the poorest sections of society. Cases peaked in June 2020 but the health system was able to cope with the excess workload. Since then, although testing rates remain low (> 300 000 cases confirmed to date), case fatality rates have stabilized, and with 6300 deaths, Pakistan seems to have flattened the COVID-19 curve. CONCLUSION: Despite notable successes in controlling the pandemic, several weaknesses remain and there are risks of rebound as the economy and educational systems reopen. There is continued need for strong technical and programmatic oversight, linked to civic society engagement and working with religious scholars to ensure nonpharmacological intervention compliance.
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected the world in an unprecedented manner and South Asian countries were among the first to experience imported cases. Pakistan's response to COVID-19 has been under scrutiny for its granularity, reach and impact. AIMS: to evaluate objectively the chronology and depth of the response to COVID-19 in Pakistan. METHODS: We evaluated available national and subnational epidemiological and burden information on COVID-19 cases and deaths in Pakistan, including projection models available to the Government at an early stage of the pandemic. RESULTS: Pakistan, with a population of 215 million and considerable geographic diversity, experienced case introduction from pilgrims returning from the Islamic Republic of Iran, followed by widespread community transmission. The National Command and Operations Centre, established through civilian and military partnership, was critical in fast tracking logistics, information gathering, real-time reporting and smart lockdowns, coupled with a massive cash support programme targeting the poorest sections of society. Cases peaked in June 2020 but the health system was able to cope with the excess workload. Since then, although testing rates remain low (> 300 000 cases confirmed to date), case fatality rates have stabilized, and with 6300 deaths, Pakistan seems to have flattened the COVID-19 curve. CONCLUSION: Despite notable successes in controlling the pandemic, several weaknesses remain and there are risks of rebound as the economy and educational systems reopen. There is continued need for strong technical and programmatic oversight, linked to civic society engagement and working with religious scholars to ensure nonpharmacological intervention compliance.
Authors: Maryam Tavakkoli; Aliya Karim; Fabienne Beatrice Fischer; Laura Monzon Llamas; Azam Raoofi; Shamsa Zafar; Carmen Sant Fruchtman; Don de Savigny; Amirhossein Takian; Marina Antillon; Daniel Cobos Muñoz Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2022-08-31 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Weiwei Zhang; Thomas Huggins; Wenwen Zheng; Shiyong Liu; Zhanwei Du; Hongli Zhu; Ahmad Raza; Ahmad Hussen Tareq Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 4.614