| Literature DB >> 34486175 |
Serina Gee1, Yoon Lee1, Aloukika Shah1, Ehsan Izadmehr1, John Belperio2, Yusaku Shino2, Sam Weigt2, Deena Goldwater3, Joanna Schaenman4.
Abstract
Frailty, defined as a state of decreased physiologic reserve, has been correlated with poorer outcomes after hospitalization or surgery. Studies in lung transplant patients have associated frailty with an increased risk of post-transplant mortality; however, a unified approach is lacking. The identification of frail patients can help clinicians pre-emptively target modifiable risk factors and may facilitate risk stratification. The Frailty Risk Score (FRS) is a chart review-based approach based on eight symptoms and four laboratory biomarkers. We applied this method in a retrospective study to investigate its utility in predicting post-transplant lung outcomes. Eighty-four lung transplant recipients were evaluated, including 51 older (≥ 60) and 33 younger (< 60) patients. Median FRS score was 3.9, with 63 categorized as frail (75%) and 21 as non-frail (25%), using a previously published cut-off of ≥3 to define frailty. A high FRS was associated with readmission in the first year after transplantation and with the number of readmissions. There was also an association between FRS score and death (p = .047). FRS may be a viable tool in the assessment of lung transplant candidates. Frail patients may benefit from earlier referral and targeted therapy prior to transplant, as well as close post-transplant follow-up.Entities:
Keywords: aging; candidate evaluation; frailty; lung transplantation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34486175 PMCID: PMC9419922 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14461
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Transplant ISSN: 0902-0063 Impact factor: 3.456