Literature DB >> 34485764

Programmatic modeling for biological systems.

Alexander L R Lubbock1,2, Carlos F Lopez1,2,3.   

Abstract

Computational modeling has become an established technique to encode mathematical representations of cellular processes and gain mechanistic insights that drive testable predictions. These models are often constructed using graphical user interfaces or domain-specific languages, with community standards used for interchange. Models undergo steady state or dynamic analysis, which can include simulation and calibration within a single application, or transfer across various tools. Here, we describe a novel programmatic modeling paradigm, whereby modeling is augmented with software engineering best practices. We focus on Python - a popular programming language with a large scientific package ecosystem. Models can be encoded as programs, adding benefits such as modularity, testing, and automated documentation generators, while still being extensible and exportable to standardized formats for use with external tools if desired. Programmatic modeling is a key technology to enable collaborative model development and enhance dissemination, transparency, and reproducibility.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34485764      PMCID: PMC8411905          DOI: 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol        ISSN: 2452-3100


  61 in total

1.  Efficient modeling, simulation and coarse-graining of biological complexity with NFsim.

Authors:  Michael W Sneddon; James R Faeder; Thierry Emonet
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 2.  Systems biology: perspectives on multiscale modeling in research on endocrine-related cancers.

Authors:  Robert Clarke; John J Tyson; Ming Tan; William T Baumann; Lu Jin; Jianhua Xuan; Yue Wang
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 5.678

3.  Programming with models: modularity and abstraction provide powerful capabilities for systems biology.

Authors:  Aneil Mallavarapu; Matthew Thomson; Benjamin Ullian; Jeremy Gunawardena
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Antimony: a modular model definition language.

Authors:  Lucian P Smith; Frank T Bergmann; Deepak Chandran; Herbert M Sauro
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-07-03       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  StochKit2: software for discrete stochastic simulation of biochemical systems with events.

Authors:  Kevin R Sanft; Sheng Wu; Min Roh; Jin Fu; Rone Kwei Lim; Linda R Petzold
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Why Jupyter is data scientists' computational notebook of choice.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Perkel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Metabolic regulation and mathematical models.

Authors:  R Heinrich; S M Rapoport; T A Rapoport
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.667

8.  CellML 2.0.

Authors:  Michael Clerx; Michael T Cooling; Jonathan Cooper; Alan Garny; Keri Moyle; David P Nickerson; Poul M F Nielsen; Hugh Sorby
Journal:  J Integr Bioinform       Date:  2020-07-24

9.  GPU-powered model analysis with PySB/cupSODA.

Authors:  Leonard A Harris; Marco S Nobile; James C Pino; Alexander L R Lubbock; Daniela Besozzi; Giancarlo Mauri; Paolo Cazzaniga; Carlos F Lopez
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  MASSpy: Building, simulating, and visualizing dynamic biological models in Python using mass action kinetics.

Authors:  Zachary B Haiman; Daniel C Zielinski; Yuko Koike; James T Yurkovich; Bernhard O Palsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Systems approaches to investigate the role of NF-κB signaling in aging.

Authors:  Masatoshi Haga; Mariko Okada
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.857

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.