Literature DB >> 34485031

Feasibility and Role of Right Ventricular Stress Echocardiography in Adult Patients.

Valeria Pergola1, Marco Previtero2, Giulia Lorenzoni2, Honoria Ocagli2, Giuseppe Simeti1, Patrizia Aruta1, Anna Baritussio1, Antonella Cecchetto1, Loira Leoni1, Daniela Mancuso1, Dario Gregori2, Giovanni Di Salvo3, Sabino Iliceto1, Donato Mele1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The great technological advancements in the field of echocardiography have led to applications of stress echocardiography (SE) in almost all diagnostic fields of cardiology, from ischemic heart disease to valvular heart disease and diastolic function. However, the assessment of the right ventricle (RV) in general, and in particular in regard to the contractile reserve of the RV, is an area that has not been previously explored. We, therefore, propose a study to investigate the potential use of SE for the assessment of RV function in adult patients. AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The primary aim is to evaluate the feasibility of right ventricular SE. The secondary aim is to assess right ventricular contractile reserve. MATHERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-one patients undergoing a physical or dobutamine stress echocardiogram for cardiovascular risk stratification or chest pain were the subject of the study. An exercise leg cycle using a standard WHO protocol was used to simultaneously assess the right and left ventricular global and regional function as well as acquiring Doppler data. Whereas the patient had limitations in mobility, a dobutamine SE was be performed. We evaluated the average values of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), S-wave, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP), and right ventricle global longitudinal (free wall) strain (RVGLS) during baseline and at the peak of the effort. RV contractile reserve was defined as the change in RVGLS from rest to peak exercise. We also assessed the reproducibility of these measurements between two different expert operators (blind analysis).
RESULTS: At least 3 over 5 RV function parameters were measurable both during baseline and at the peak of the effort in 95% of patients, while all 5 parameters in 65% of our population, demonstrating an excellent feasibility. All RV-studied variables showed a statistically significant increase (P < 0.001) at peak compared to the baseline. The average percentage increases at peak were 31.1% for TAPSE, 24.8% for FAC, 50.6% for S-wave, 55.2% for PAPS, and 39.8% for RV strain. The reproducibility between operators at baseline and peak was excellent. Our study demonstrates that TAPSE, FAC, and S-wave are highly feasible at rest and at peak, while TAPSE, S-wave, and sPAP are the most reliable measurements during RV stress echo.
CONCLUSION: RVGLS is useful in the assessment of RV contractile reserve in patients with good acoustic window. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of contrast echocardiography in improving RV contractile reserve assessment during SE. Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Cardiovascular Echography.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Right ventricular function; right ventricular reserve; stress echocardiography

Year:  2021        PMID: 34485031      PMCID: PMC8388328          DOI: 10.4103/jcecho.jcecho_4_21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Echogr        ISSN: 2211-4122


INTRODUCTION

Stress echocardiography (SE) is widely used in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function[1] for diagnostic and prognostic stratification of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The great technological advancements in the field of echocardiography (tissue Doppler imaging, strain technology, three-dimensional (3D) echo, and transpulmonary echo contrast agents) have led to applications of SE in almost all diagnostic fields of cardiology, including valvular heart disease and diastolic function.[2] However, the assessment of the right ventricle (RV) in general, and in particular in regard to the contractile reserve of the RV, is an area that has been poorly explored. Resting echocardiographic parameters used so far have shown a limited ability to detect early impairment of right ventricular function. Recently, some studies have suggested that physical or pharmacological stress may unmask RV function abnormalities in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot, with normal right ventricular function under resting conditions.[345] There has been no similar study performed outside the grown-up congenital heart population. The use of SE provides the possibility to test both systolic and diastolic functions of the RV in response to increased loading conditions. This can potentially be used to predict which subset of patients may benefit from intervention on the tricuspid valve before the RV displays signs of failure.[6] We, therefore, propose a study to investigate the potential use of SE for the assessment of RV function in adult patients. The primary aim is to evaluate the feasibility of right ventricular SE in any patient with more than trivial TR. The secondary aim is to assess right ventricular contractile reserve.

METHODS

Eighty-one patients undergoing a physical or dobutamine stress echocardiogram for cardiovascular risk stratification or chest pain were the subject of the study. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years and normal baseline RV function (right ventricular fractional area change [FAC] >35% and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion [TAPSE] >16 mm). Exclusion criteria were inadequate visualization of the RV, presence of right ventricular dysfunction, systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) peak >60 mmHg (pulmonary stress hypertension), positive stress test for left myocardial ischemia, presence of more than mild valvular disease, no more than two of the following coronary risk factors: hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and diabetes, Grade III or higher diastolic dysfunction at baseline, and severe respiratory, renal, or hepatic dysfunction. Echocardiographic examinations were performed on GE Vivid 9. An exercise leg cycle using a standard WHO protocol[7] was used to simultaneously assess the right and LV global and regional function as well as acquiring Doppler data. Data were acquired at baseline and peak imaging. Exercise leg cycle testing was considered valid if the patient reached a peak systolic blood pressure/heart rate product of 25.000 mmHg beats/min, or at least 85% of predicted maximum heart rate with neither exercise induced angina pectoris neither evidence for reversible ischemia during the study. Whereas the patient had limitations in mobility, a dobutamine SE was performed according to our routine protocol (four stages) with baseline, low dose, intermediate, and peak imaging. Doppler echocardiography was performed with a Vivid 7 ultrasound system (GE Healthcare), using a M3S transducer with a frequency range of 1.5–4.0 Mhz. Three additional images evaluating the RV will be obtained from the: (i) parasternal short-axis view at the mid-level, (ii) apical four-chamber view of the RV, and (iii) continuous-wave Doppler velocity of tricuspid regurgitation (TR), at baseline and immediately after acquisition of routine peak stress images. Right ventricular function was assessed at baseline and peak stress, by measuring the change of TAPSE and the change in the FAC. We evaluated the average values of TAPSE, FAC, S-wave, sPAP, and right ventricle global longitudinal (free wall) strain (RVGLS) during baseline and at the peak of the effort. RV contractile reserve was defined as the change in RVGLS from rest to peak exercise. Longitudinal strain is generally reported as a negative number as it is a measure of myocardial fiber longitudinal shortening during systole. Therefore, while more negative strain values reflect greater myocardial deformation when expressed as an absolute value, the higher numbers reflect greater myocardial deformation. We also assessed the reproducibility of these measurements between two different expert operators (blind analysis). Conventional indices of LV systolic function were also measured at baseline and peak stress.

Statistical analysis

Eleven echocardiographic examinations were randomly selected to assess inter-rater and intra-rater variability. Two distinct operators were asked to perform the echocardiographic assessment in a blinded fashion. In addition, one of the two operators had to analyze the same series of examinations twice without knowing it. Inter- and intra-rater reliability was then assessed using Bland–Altman method. Continuous variables are represented with median (I and III quartiles) and mean (standard deviation). Categorical data were expressed as percentages. Differences in parameters collected at baseline and at peak were assessed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test to deal with repeated measures for each patient. All tests were performed two-sided, and a significance level of P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. Differences in parameters collected at baseline and at peak were assessed using paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test to deal with repeated measures for each patient. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 22.0 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

RESULTS

As shown in Table 1, our study included 81 patients (49 males/32 females) with a mean age of 64.3 ± 11.2 years. The maximum age of participants was 82 years, and the minimum age was 43 years. A submaximal test was achieved by all participants and no tests were terminated because of arrhythmia or other symptoms. During image acquisition at peak exercise, all patients were in normal sinus rhythm.
Table 1

Clinical and demographic characteristics in patients undergoing exercise and dobutamine stress test

Variable, n (%)Exercise 45 (54)Dobutamine 46 (56)Total (81) P
Age (years)57.4±9.769.72±9.1464.3±11.2<0.001
Sex (male)23 (51)26 (57)49 (60)0.408
Hypertension10 (22)8 (23)18 (22)0.368
Diabetes4 (9)7 (20)11 (14)0.627
Dyslipidemia1 (2)3 (8)4 (5)0.457
Family history2 (4)3 (8)5 (6)0.883
Smoke13 (28)15 (42)28 (35)0.376
VTD (ml/m2)59.7±4.657.4±3.958.3±4.20.298
LVEF (%)60.1±4.958.9±4.259.6±4.60.248
ATD (cm2/m2)10.1±1.59.4±1.29.9±1.40.306
FAC (%)41.1±5.539.4±3.840.4±4.90.145

*Percentage is referred to the number of patients in the column. FAC=Fractional area change, LVEF=Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDV=left ventricle end diastolic volume, RVEDA=right ventricle end diastolic area

Clinical and demographic characteristics in patients undergoing exercise and dobutamine stress test *Percentage is referred to the number of patients in the column. FAC=Fractional area change, LVEF=Left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEDV=left ventricle end diastolic volume, RVEDA=right ventricle end diastolic area Fifteen patients had no risk factors for CAD, while 40 patients had 1 risk factor and 13 patients had 2 risk factors for CAD. Forty-five (54%) patients underwent exercise stress, while 46 (56%) dobutamine stress because of inability to cycle. There was no statistically significant difference in patients undergoing physical or dobutamine test except for age and diabetes [Table 1]. At least 3 over 5 RV function parameterswere measurable both during baseline and at the peak of the effort in 95% of patients, while all 5 parameters in 65% of our population, demonstrating a good feasibility. Table 2 shows the feasibility at rest and peak for the 5 parameters. There was an excellent feasibility at stress for TAPSE, S-wave, and FAC. All RV-studied variables showed a statistically significant increase (P < 0.001) at peak compared to the baseline. The average percentage increases at peak were 31.1% for TAPSE, 24.8% for FAC, 50.6% for S-wave, 55.2% for PAPS, and 39.8% for RVGLS. The mean and median values at rest and peak are reported in Table 3. In particular, the median sPAP was 28 mmHg at rest and 42 mmHg at peak [Table 3].
Table 2

Feasibility at rest and peak

Rest (n=81), n (%)Peak (n=81), n (%) P
TAPSE79 (98)78 (96)NS
FAC78 (96)77 (95)NS
S-wave72 (89)70 (86)NS
sPAP58 (72)47 (58)0.07
RVGLS71 (87)62 (76)<0.001

NS=Not significant, TAPSE=Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, FAC=Fractional area change, sPAP=Systolic pulmonary artery pressure, RVGLS=right ventricle global longitudinal strain

Table 3

Difference of parameters between peak and baseline

Rest (n=81)Peak (n=81) P
TAPSE<0.001
 Median (Q1–Q3)21.00029.000
(18.000–24.000)(25.000–32.750)
 Mean±SD21.861±4.31728.759±5.744
FAC<0.001
 Median (Q1–Q3)39.00049.000
(37.000–42.000)(45.000–55.000)
 Mean±SD40.410±4.94050.000±5.835
S-wave<0.001
 Median (Q1–Q3)13.00021.000
(12.000–17.000)(18.000–24.000)
 Mean±SD14.063±3.01520.842±4.750
sPAP<0.001
 Median (Q1–Q3)28.00042.500
(20.000–29.000)(38.000–45.000)
 Mean±SD25.931±6.31641.370±8.304
RVGLS<0.001
 Median (Q1–Q3)−28.000−37.000
(24.000–32.000)(32.000–41.000)
 Mean±SD−28.932±3.845−37.423±4.799

TAPSE=Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, FAC=Fractional area change, sPAP=Systolic pulmonary artery pressure, RVGLS=right ventricle global longitudinal strain, SD=Standard deviation

Feasibility at rest and peak NS=Not significant, TAPSE=Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, FAC=Fractional area change, sPAP=Systolic pulmonary artery pressure, RVGLS=right ventricle global longitudinal strain Difference of parameters between peak and baseline TAPSE=Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, FAC=Fractional area change, sPAP=Systolic pulmonary artery pressure, RVGLS=right ventricle global longitudinal strain, SD=Standard deviation Figure 1 shows the reproducibility between operators at baseline and peak with good correlation.
Figure 1

Reproducibility between operators at baseline and peak

Reproducibility between operators at baseline and peak Table 4 shows the reproducibility of the data by two separate operators with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
Table 4

Differences of means computed as operator 1 minus operator 2

ParameterDifference of means (95% CI)
TAPSE basal0.55 (−4.36–5.45)
TAPSE peak1.82 (−1.67–5.3)
FAC basal−0.82 (−6.14–4.5)
FAC peak1.18 (−8.17–10.53)
Onda S’ basal0.4 (−2.25–3.05)
Onda S’ peak−0.27 (−5.68–5.14)
sPAP basal−1.36 (−6.99–4.27)
PAPS peak−1.2 (−9.71–7.31)
RVGLS basal−0.82 (−3.56–1.93)
RVGLS peak0.25 (−5.37–5.87)

TAPSE=Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, FAC=Fractional area change, RVGLS=right ventricle global longitudinal strain, CI=Confidence interval, sPAP=systolic pulmonary artery pressure

Differences of means computed as operator 1 minus operator 2 TAPSE=Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, FAC=Fractional area change, RVGLS=right ventricle global longitudinal strain, CI=Confidence interval, sPAP=systolic pulmonary artery pressure

DISCUSSION

The echocardiogram during physical exertion or during pharmacological stress (dobutamine or dipyridamole) has become a cornerstone of imaging.[8910] Although the prognostic value of the size and function of the RV has been proven by numerous studies,[1112131415] guidelines on the echocardiogram during physical exertion or during pharmacological stress have focused almost exclusively on the left ventricle.[8] Up to now, only a few articles have been published on the RV function during physical exertion or pharmacological stress. Most of these papers have focused on the pediatric population affected by congenital heart disease[161718] or on patients with pulmonary hypertension.[19] A single study[20] assessed the feasibility of the RV assessment during exercise stress but had the limitation of having analyzed few patients (only 30) and only including patients with a discernible TR signal. Conversely, in our study, we included a large sample of patients (n = 81) and we included also patients with no or trivial TR. Right ventricular function augments with exercise, and loss of this adaptive ability often determines symptoms. Reported upper normal limits of Doppler-derived sPAP during exercise in normal subjects[212223] are confirmed by our data. In our cohort of patients, TAPSE, FAC, and S-wave were highly feasible at stress, while sPAP was less feasible because we included in the study also patients with no or trivial TR. RVGLS had a good feasibility at stress of 64%. It has been reported that RVGLS correlates well with RV ejection fraction measured by magnetic resonance and may serve as a predictor of outcome.[24252627] In our study, there was a median global longitudinal strain of −28% at baseline and of −37% at peak, with a median increase of 39.8%, in agreement with previous studies.[20] All the RV parameters showed little inter-operator variability when measured at baseline. At the peak of the exercise, M-mode and Doppler-derived parameters (TAPSE, S-wave, and sPAP) showed an excellent reproducibility (ICC >0.86) while it was good for 2D-derived parameters (FAC and RV-free wall strain; ICC = 0.74). Our results are partially in agreement with Anjak et al.[20] who found a good correlation for TAPSE and S-wave but not for FAC and RV strain. We believe that improvements in the setting of echocardiographic machine and software development may explain the inconsistency. Our study demonstrates that TAPSE, S-wave, and FAC are the most reliable measurements during RV stress echo. RV strain is less feasible, with a good reproducibility, and it is useful in the assessment of RV contractile reserve in patients with good acoustic window. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of contrast echocardiography in improving RV contractile reserve assessment during SE.

Limitations

This is a single-center study. We did not include in our analysis patients with RV disease. Larger multicenter studies including patients with RV diseases are needed.

CONCLUSION

RV SE proved to be feasible and showed little inter-operator variability in patients with at least trivial TR. It provided valuable information about RV contractile reserve that may help stratifying the risk of RV failure in patients undergoing TV surgery. The ability to couple the left and RVs during stress can provide meaningful information in healthy and diseased individuals as it can support the diagnosis of the etiology of pulmonary hypertension and other conditions and can offer valuable prognostic information, in particular regarding RV contractile reserve. SE appears to be a fascinating and versatile tool for better understanding the pathophysiology of pulmonary circulation and for investigating otherwise unexplained exertional dyspnea.

Ethical clearance

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  26 in total

Review 1.  Stress Echocardiography Expert Consensus Statement--Executive Summary: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC).

Authors:  Rosa Sicari; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Arturo Evangelista; Jaroslav Kasprzak; Patrizio Lancellotti; Don Poldermans; Jens-Uwe Voigt; Jose Luis Zamorano
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 29.983

2.  Objective measures of right ventricular function during exercise: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Ahmad Anjak; Angel López-Candales; Francisco R Lopez; David Harris; Jean Elwing
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.724

3.  Doppler tissue imaging evaluation of right ventricular function at rest and during dobutamine infusion in patients after repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Sotiria C Apostolopoulou; Cleo V Laskari; Alexandros Tsoutsinos; Spyridon Rammos
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  The Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Size and Strain in the Risk Assessment of Right Heart Failure Post - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

Authors:  Marie Aymami; Myriam Amsallem; Jackson Adams; Karim Sallam; Kegan Moneghetti; Matthew Wheeler; William Hiesinger; Jeffrey Teuteberg; Dana Weisshaar; Jean-Philippe Verhoye; Y Joseph Woo; Richard Ha; François Haddad; Dipanjan Banerjee
Journal:  J Card Fail       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 5.712

5.  Stress Echocardiographic Evaluation for D-Transposition of the Great Arteries after Atrial Redirection: Unmasking Early Signs of Myocardial Dysfunction and Baffle Stenosis.

Authors:  Merav Dvir-Orgad; Meera Anand; Astrid M De Souza; Mary T Zadorsky; Marla C Kiess; James E Potts; George G S Sandor
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.251

6.  Prognostic value of right ventricular longitudinal peak systolic strain in patients with pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Marlieke L A Haeck; Roderick W C Scherptong; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Eduard R Holman; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax; Hubert W Vliegen; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Exercise capacity in young patients after total repair of Tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  B Sarubbi; G Pacileo; C Pisacane; V Ducceschi; C Iacono; M G Russo; A Iacono; R Calabrò
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.655

8.  The Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Deformation Imaging in Early Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Thomas P Mast; Karim Taha; Maarten J Cramer; Joost Lumens; Jeroen F van der Heijden; Berto J Bouma; Maarten P van den Berg; Folkert W Asselbergs; Pieter A Doevendans; Arco J Teske
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-03-14

9.  The Prognostic Impact of the Evolution of RV Function in Idiopathic DCM.

Authors:  Marco Merlo; Marco Gobbo; Davide Stolfo; Pasquale Losurdo; Federica Ramani; Giulia Barbati; Alberto Pivetta; Andrea Di Lenarda; Marco Anzini; Marta Gigli; Bruno Pinamonti; Gianfranco Sinagra
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2016-06-22

10.  Usefulness of dobutamine stress echocardiography with Tissue Doppler imaging for the evaluation and follow-up of patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot.

Authors:  Stella Brili; Ilias Stamatopoulos; John Barbetseas; Christina Chrysohoou; Nikolaos Alexopoulos; Maria Misailidou; Athanasios Bratsas; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2008-08-23       Impact factor: 5.251

View more
  1 in total

1.  Pulmonary Arterial Pressure Changes Under Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Non-Anemic Iron Deficient COPD Subjects.

Authors:  Ana Christina Wanderley Xavier; Rodrigo Koch; Leandro Steinhorst Goelzer; Paulo T Muller
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2022-08-24
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.