| Literature DB >> 34484642 |
Fatemeh Zamani1,2, Azam Bolhassani1, Sepideh Shahbazi1, Ahmad Faghih1,2, Seyed Mehdi Sadat1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) is still a major global concern and no effective therapeutic vaccine has been produced to prevent the problem. Among HIV-1 proteins, vif as a basic cytoplasmic protein of HIV-1 is involved in late stages of viral generation and plays important role in HIV-1 virion replication. It also increases the stability of virion cores, which probably inhibits early degradation of viral entry. Therefore, it seems rational to apply this protein as a vaccine based on its impact on HIV-1 life cycle. This study aimed at cloning, expression and production of vif protein as an HIV-1 vaccine candidate.Entities:
Keywords: HIV-1; Vaccines; Vif protein
Year: 2021 PMID: 34484642 PMCID: PMC8377405 DOI: 10.18502/ajmb.v13i3.6369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Avicenna J Med Biotechnol ISSN: 2008-2835
Figure 1.A) Restriction analysis of the plasmid construct in 1% agarose gel. The pET 23a harboring vif was digested by Nhel/Hindlll enzymes. The size of remaining parts of plasmid after digestion was 3608 bp and the size of inserts was 570 bp. B) Confirmation of vif gene cloned in pEGFP-N1/vif vector using colony PCR. The arrow indicates the specific amplified band (570 bp) corresponding the target gene inserted into the vector. DNA size marker of 1 kb was used.
Figure 2.Confirmation of the recombinant protein expression by western blotting. Lane 1: un-induced bacterial lysate. Lane 2: bacterial lysate after induction. The pre-stained protein ladder (10–180 kDa) was used.
Figure 3.SDS-PAGE analysis for vif protein expression in E. coli BL21 (DE3): (A) Optimum expression to find the best OD600nm for induction; lane 1,2,3 and 4 show 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1, respectively. (B) Time optimization; lane 1: before induction, and lanes 2–6 show 1, 2, 3, 4 hr and O/N, respectively after induction. (C) Optimization of IPTG concentration; lane 1: before induction, and lanes 2–5 show 2.5, 5, 10, and 15 mM, respectively. (D) Recombinant protein purification; lane 1: before induction, lane 2: bacterial crude lysate after induction, lanes 3 – 4: washing solution, lanes 5–6: elution solution. M: protein weight marker is 19–117 kDa. The arrows represent specific 23-kDa band.
Figure 4.The GFP expression by immunofluorescence microscope (A and B) and flow cytometry (C). In contrast to un-transfected HEK 293 T cells (B1–B2), the cells co-transfected with pEGFP-N1/vif plasmid produced GFP emission (A1–A2) after 48 hr post-transfection. (C) 41.33% level of expression in GFP in comparison with negative control cells (HEK-293T).