| Literature DB >> 34484327 |
Pei-Zhe Liang1,2, Li Li1,2,3, Ya-Nan Zhang1,2,4, Yan Shen1,2,4, Li-Li Zhang1,2,3, Jie Zhou1,2, Zhi-Jie Wang1,2, Shu Wang2,5, Sha Yang1,2,6.
Abstract
Background: Memory loss and cognitive impairment characterize the neurodegenerative disorder, Alzheimer's disease (AD). Amyloid-β (Aβ) is the key factor that triggers the course of AD, and reducing the deposition of Aβ in the brain has been considered as a potential target for the treatment of AD. In clinical and animal studies, electroacupuncture (EA) has been shown to be an effective treatment for AD. In recent years, substantial evidence has accumulated suggesting the important role of the glymphatic system in Aβ clearance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore whether EA modifies the accumulation of Aβ through the glymphatic system and may thus be applied to alleviate cognitive impairments.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34484327 PMCID: PMC8416373 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9960304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.599
Figure 1The process of this study.
Figure 2EA stimulation.
Figure 3EA improved the ability of learning and memory of SAMP8 mice: (a) the escape latency time; (b) representative swim paths of each group in the hidden platform trial; (c) number of crossing the platform; (d) time in target quadrant. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 15 in each group). ∗P < 0.05 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the Rc group; #P < 0.05 and ###P < 0.001 versus the Pc group.
Figure 4EA alleviated neuropathological injury of brain tissue in SAMP8 mice: (a) HE staining, scale bars = 50 μm; (b) Nissl staining, scale bars = 20 μm; (c) the number of Nissl bodies in the hippocampus and cortex. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group). ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the Rc group; #P < 0.05 versus the Pc group.
Figure 5EA reduced Aβ accumulation in SAMP8 mice: (a) content of Aβ1-40 in the hippocampus and cortex; (b) content of Aβ1-42 in the hippocampus and cortex. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 6 in each group). ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the Rc group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 versus the Pc group.
Figure 6EA improved glymphatic system function in SAMP8 mice: (a) time-dependent anatomical routes of paravascular influx in the glymphatic system; (b) signal intensity of ROIs. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 in each group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the Rc group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 versus the Pc group.
Figure 7EA inhibited the reactivity of astrocytes and improved AQP4 polarity. (a) GFAP-positive cells were spread in each group, scale bars = 50 μm. (b) The mean fluorescence intensity of GFAP-positive cells in the hippocampus and cortex. (c) Immunofluorescence: double-labeling of GFAP and AQP4, scale bars = 50 μm. (d) Astrocytic AQP4 polarity. Data are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 4 in each group). ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 versus the Rc group; #P < 0.05 and ##P < 0.01 versus the Pc group.