Literature DB >> 34483470

A Natural Experiment to Test the Effect of Sanction Certainty and Celerity on Substance-Impaired Driving: North Dakota's 24/7 Sobriety Program.

Greg Midgette1,2, Beau Kilmer3, Nancy Nicosia4, Paul Heaton5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the deterrent effect of a program that increases the certainty and celerity of sanction for arrestees ordered to abstain from alcohol and other drugs on substance-impaired driving arrests.
METHODS: We examine participant compliance with orders to abstain from alcohol and other drug use via breathalyzer, body-worn continuous alcohol monitoring (CAM) devices, transdermal drug patches, and urinalyses. We then evaluate the impact of the 24/7 Sobriety program on substance-impaired driving arrests. Using variation across counties in the timing of program implementation in North Dakota as a natural experiment, we use differences-in-differences fixed effects Poisson regressions to measure the program's effect on county-level arrests for substance-impaired driving.
RESULTS: Over half of participants ordered to abstain from substance use complete 24/7 Sobriety without a detected substance use event. At the county level, the program is associated with a 9 percent reduction in substance-impaired driving arrests after accounting for the impact of oil exploration in the Bakken region, law enforcement intensity, alcohol availability, whether the state's large universities were in session, and socio-demographic characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest frequent monitoring combined with increased sanction celerity deters substance use-involved crime. While the results are generally consistent with an earlier study of 24/7 Sobriety in another state, differences in the study outcome measures and implementation choices across states make direct comparisons difficult. More can be learned by conducting randomized controlled trials that vary time on program, testing technology, and/or level of sanction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  alcohol; community corrections; decision making; deterrence; impaired driving; substance use

Year:  2020        PMID: 34483470      PMCID: PMC8414695          DOI: 10.1007/s10940-020-09458-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Quant Criminol        ISSN: 0748-4518


  13 in total

Review 1.  Toward a behavioral economic understanding of drug dependence: delay discounting processes.

Authors:  W K Bickel; L A Marsch
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 2.  Relapse to driving under the influence (DUI): a review.

Authors:  Thomas H Nochajski; Paul R Stasiewicz
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-12-20

3.  Fatigue, alcohol and performance impairment.

Authors:  D Dawson; K Reid
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The behavioral economics and neuroeconomics of reinforcer pathologies: implications for etiology and treatment of addiction.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; David P Jarmolowicz; E Terry Mueller; Kirstin M Gatchalian
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Still HOPEful: Reconsidering a "failed" replication of a swift, certain, and fair approach to reducing substance use among individuals under criminal justice supervision.

Authors:  Keith Humphreys; Beau Kilmer
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Can a criminal justice alcohol abstention programme with swift, certain, and modest sanctions (24/7 Sobriety) reduce population mortality? A retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Nancy Nicosia; Beau Kilmer; Paul Heaton
Journal:  Lancet Psychiatry       Date:  2016-02-09       Impact factor: 27.083

Review 7.  Alcohol ignition interlock programmes for reducing drink driving recidivism.

Authors:  C Willis; S Lybrand; N Bellamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2004-10-18

8.  Mandating Treatment Based on Interlock Performance: Evidence for Effectiveness.

Authors:  Robert B Voas; A Scott Tippetts; Gwen Bergen; Milton Grosz; Paul Marques
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data?

Authors:  Jay M Ver Hoef; Peter L Boveng
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 5.499

10.  The behavioral economics of drunk driving.

Authors:  Frank A Sloan; Lindsey M Eldred; Yanzhi Xu
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.804

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.