Literature DB >> 34480959

Does the uncertainty in relative biological effectiveness affect patient treatment in proton therapy?

Brita S Sørensen1, Jörg Pawelke2, Julia Bauer3, Neil G Burnet4, Alexandru Dasu5, Morten Høyer6, Christian P Karger7, Mechthild Krause8, Marco Schwarz9, Tracy S A Underwood10, Dirk Wagenaar11, Gillian A Whitfield12, Armin Lühr13.   

Abstract

Clinical treatment with protons uses the concept of relative biological effectiveness (RBE) to convert the absorbed dose into an RBE-weighted dose that equals the dose for radiotherapy with photons causing the same biological effect. Currently, in proton therapy a constant RBE of 1.1 is generically used. However, empirical data indicate that the RBE is not constant, but increases at the distal edge of the proton beam. This increase in RBE is of concern, as the clinical impact is still unresolved, and clinical studies demonstrating a clinical effect of an increased RBE are emerging. Within the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) work package 6 on radiobiology and RBE, a workshop was held in February 2020 in Manchester with one day of discussion dedicated to the impact of proton RBE in a clinical context. Current data on RBE effects, patient outcome and modelling from experimental as well as clinical studies were presented and discussed. Furthermore, representatives from European clinical proton therapy centres, who were involved in patient treatment, laid out their current clinical practice on how to consider the risk of a variable RBE in their centres. In line with the workshop, this work considers the actual impact of RBE issues on patient care in proton therapy by reviewing preclinical data on the relation between linear energy transfer (LET) and RBE, current clinical data sets on RBE effects in patients, and applied clinical strategies to manage RBE uncertainties. A better understanding of the variability in RBE would allow development of proton treatments which are safer and more effective.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical data; Current clinical practice; Distal edge; LET; Preclinical data; Proton therapy; RBE

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34480959     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.08.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  3 in total

1.  Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.

Authors:  Christian Hahn; Lena Heuchel; Jakob Ödén; Erik Traneus; Jörg Wulff; Sandija Plaude; Beate Timmermann; Christian Bäumer; Armin Lühr
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-10-22       Impact factor: 4.309

2.  Quantification of biological range uncertainties in patients treated at the Krakow proton therapy centre.

Authors:  Magdalena Garbacz; Jan Gajewski; Marco Durante; Kamil Kisielewicz; Nils Krah; Renata Kopeć; Paweł Olko; Vincenzo Patera; Ilaria Rinaldi; Marzena Rydygier; Angelo Schiavi; Emanuele Scifoni; Tomasz Skóra; Agata Skrzypek; Francesco Tommasino; Antoni Rucinski
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 3.481

3.  Normofractionated and moderately hypofractionated proton therapy: comparison of acute toxicity and early quality of life outcomes.

Authors:  Maciej J Pelak; Birgit Flechl; Eugen Hug; Razvan Galalae; Lisa Konrath; Joanna Góra; Piero Fossati; Carola Lütgendorf-Caucig; Slavisa Tubin; Rastko Konstantinovic; Ulrike Mock; Christoph Fussl; Petra Georg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.738

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.