Jing Cui1,2, Yu Zhao1,2, Feng Wang1,2, Daniel F Gochberg1,2,3, Zhongliang Zu1,2. 1. Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 2. Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA. 3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effect at around -1.6 ppm from water, termed NOE(-1.6), was previously reported in rat and human brain, and some publications suggest that it may be related to blood. Here, we studied whether the NOE(-1.6) arises from blood through in vivo and ex vivo experiments. METHODS: To evaluate the contribution from in vivo blood to NOE(-1.6), intravascular signals in rat brain were suppressed by two approaches: (1) signal acquisition with a diffusion-weighting of b = 400 s/mm2 ; (2) intravascular injection of 5 mg/kg monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticle (MION). Ex vivo blood sample was also prepared. The signals were acquired using a chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) pulse sequence. Multiple-pool Lorentzian fitting of CEST Z-spectra was performed to quantify the NOE(-1.6) signal. RESULTS: There are no significant variations in the fitted in vivo NOE(-1.6) signals when measured with or without diffusion-weighting, but significant signal decease does occur after injection of MION. The NOE(-1.6) signal from ex vivo blood is weaker than that from in vivo tissues. CONCLUSION: Considering the relatively small volume of blood in brain, the in vivo experiments with diffusion weighting and the ex vivo experiments both suggest that the NOE(-1.6) is not mainly from blood. The mechanism for the in vivo experiments with MION are less clear. MION not only suppresses MR signals from intravascular space, but changes the susceptibility in the perivascular space. This result suggests that although the NOE(-1.6) is not mainly from blood, it may be vasculature dependent.
PURPOSE: A relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement (rNOE) saturation transfer effect at around -1.6 ppm from water, termed NOE(-1.6), was previously reported in rat and human brain, and some publications suggest that it may be related to blood. Here, we studied whether the NOE(-1.6) arises from blood through in vivo and ex vivo experiments. METHODS: To evaluate the contribution from in vivo blood to NOE(-1.6), intravascular signals in rat brain were suppressed by two approaches: (1) signal acquisition with a diffusion-weighting of b = 400 s/mm2 ; (2) intravascular injection of 5 mg/kg monocrystalline iron oxide nanoparticle (MION). Ex vivo blood sample was also prepared. The signals were acquired using a chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) pulse sequence. Multiple-pool Lorentzian fitting of CEST Z-spectra was performed to quantify the NOE(-1.6) signal. RESULTS: There are no significant variations in the fitted in vivo NOE(-1.6) signals when measured with or without diffusion-weighting, but significant signal decease does occur after injection of MION. The NOE(-1.6) signal from ex vivo blood is weaker than that from in vivo tissues. CONCLUSION: Considering the relatively small volume of blood in brain, the in vivo experiments with diffusion weighting and the ex vivo experiments both suggest that the NOE(-1.6) is not mainly from blood. The mechanism for the in vivo experiments with MION are less clear. MION not only suppresses MR signals from intravascular space, but changes the susceptibility in the perivascular space. This result suggests that although the NOE(-1.6) is not mainly from blood, it may be vasculature dependent.
Authors: Xiao-Yong Zhang; Feng Wang; Hua Li; Junzhong Xu; Daniel F Gochberg; John C Gore; Zhongliang Zu Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-03-08 Impact factor: 4.044
Authors: Zhongliang Zu; Hua Li; Junzhong Xu; Xiao-Yong Zhang; Moritz Zaiss; Ke Li; Mark D Does; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-05-17 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Zhongliang Zu; Eugene C Lin; Elizabeth A Louie; Junzhong Xu; Hua Li; Jingping Xie; Christopher L Lankford; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Scott D Swanson; Mark D Does; John C Gore; Daniel F Gochberg Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2020-04-03 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Simon M Shah; Olivier E Mougin; Andrew J Carradus; Nicolas Geades; Richard Dury; William Morley; Penny A Gowland Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 6.556