| Literature DB >> 34479555 |
Chenxi Qin1,2, Jun Lv1,3,4, Canqing Yu5, Yu Guo6, Zheng Bian6, Meng Gao1, Huaidong Du2,7, Ling Yang2,7, Yiping Chen2,7, Leijia Shen8, Songgen Zhou9, Junshi Chen10, Zhengming Chen2, Liming Li11.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of the overall diet quality on cardiometabolic diseases has been well studied in the Western population. However, evidence is still in need regarding dietary patterns depicting unique Chinese dietary habits and their associations with cardiometabolic diseases.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Cohort; Diabetes; Dietary pattern
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34479555 PMCID: PMC8418004 DOI: 10.1186/s12937-021-00730-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr J ISSN: 1475-2891 Impact factor: 3.271
Baseline characteristics of participants by quintiles dietary pattern scores (n = 477,465)
| Baseline characteristics | Traditional northern dietary pattern | Modern dietary pattern | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q3 | Q5 | Q1 | Q3 | Q5 | |
| Age, mean (SD), y | 53.4 (9.8) | 49.5 (10.7) | 51.6 (10.5) | 55.6 (10.8) | 51.3 (10.3) | 47.9 (10.5) |
| Women, % | 69.7 | 57.3 | 50.7 | 77.8 | 58.9 | 45.4 |
| Urban residents, % | 45.8 | 52.7 | 19.1 | 6.7 | 33.9 | 89.2 |
| Highest education level, % | ||||||
| Primary school and below | 65.4 | 46.2 | 27.3 | 64.8 | 49.4 | 24.3 |
| Middle or high school | 34.1 | 51.1 | 64.9 | 34.9 | 48.9 | 66.0 |
| Current smokers, % | ||||||
| Women | 1.2 | 1.0 | 0.4 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| Men | 74.4 | 68.7 | 59.0 | 68.3 | 69.8 | 61.5 |
| Weekly drinkers, % | ||||||
| Women | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.8 |
| Men | 38.2 | 31.9 | 25.5 | 21.5 | 32.8 | 32.6 |
| Physical activity, mean (SD), MET h/d | 22.9 (15.0) | 20.8 (12.3) | 20.7 (14.9) | 22.0 (14.2) | 21.8 (14.5) | 20.0 (11.7) |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 23.6 (3.3) | 23.8 (3.2) | 23.4 (3.4) | 23.3 (3.5) | 23.6 (3.3) | 23.8 (3.3) |
| Waist circumference, mean (SD), cm | 80.3 (9.3) | 81.0 (9.5) | 80.0 (9.6) | 79.5 (9.6) | 80.5 (9.4) | 81.2 (9.8) |
| Systolic blood pressure, mean (SD), mmHg | 132.5 (21.4) | 131.1 (20.3) | 127.2 (20.9) | 131.4 (22.1) | 130.8 (20.9) | 129.0 (19.8) |
| Diastolic blood pressure, mean (SD), mmHg | 78.9 (10.8) | 78.1 (10.9) | 75.9 (11.2) | 78.0 (11.3) | 77.9 (11.0) | 77.2 (11.0) |
| Hypertension, % | 34.4 | 33.1 | 25.9 | 32.1 | 31.8 | 29.8 |
| Diabetes, % | 3.5 | 4.6 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.8 |
| Medication in diagnosed hypertension, % | ||||||
| Antihypertensive medication | 41.1 | 51.7 | 49.9 | 43.4 | 50.4 | 53.3 |
| Statin | 1.6 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Aspirin | 3.0 | 5.5 | 4.5 | 3.3 | 4.9 | 5.1 |
| Family history, % | ||||||
| CVD | 17.6 | 18.7 | 20.6 | 16.1 | 18.8 | 20.4 |
| Diabetes* | 4.0 | 5.4 | 6.7 | 3.9 | 5.1 | 7.1 |
All variables were standardised for age, sex and survey sites according to eligible participants, as appropriate
MET: metabolic equivalent; BMI: body mass index. SD: standard deviation
* Adjusted proportions were estimated in the non-diabetic population
Hazard ratios of cardiometabolic diseases by quintiles of the traditional northern dietary pattern among 477,465 participants
| Endpoints | Traditional northern dietary pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| CVD | ||||||
| Cases | 25,118 | 27,083 | 26,571 | 30,448 | 28,495 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 26.1 | 25.6 | 25.5 | 24.4 | 23.1 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.98 (0.96, 0.99) | 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) | 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) | 0.90 (0.87, 0.93) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.97 (0.95, 0.98) | 0.96 (0.94, 0.98) | 0.94 (0.91, 0.96) | 0.90 (0.87, 0.93) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.97 (0.96, 0.99) | 0.96 (0.94, 0.98) | 0.94 (0.92, 0.97) | 0.92 (0.89, 0.95) | < 0.001 |
| MCE | ||||||
| Cases | 966 | 1596 | 1665 | 2277 | 2366 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.8 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.11) | 0.98 (0.90, 1.07) | 0.90 (0.80, 1.00) | 0.88 (0.77, 1.00) | 0.017 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (0.92, 1.09) | 0.97 (0.88, 1.06) | 0.91 (0.81, 1.01) | 0.92 (0.80, 1.04) | 0.121 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) | 0.96 (0.87, 1.05) | 0.90 (0.80, 1.00) | 0.92 (0.81, 1.05) | 0.118 |
| HS | ||||||
| Cases | 1654 | 2085 | 1749 | 2132 | 2138 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.95 (0.89, 1.02) | 0.86 (0.79, 0.93) | 0.81 (0.73, 0.90) | 0.62 (0.54, 0.71) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.95 (0.89, 1.03) | 0.87 (0.81, 0.94) | 0.85 (0.76, 0.94) | 0.68 (0.59, 0.78) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (0.93, 1.07) | 0.89 (0.82, 0.96) | 0.89 (0.80, 0.98) | 0.78 (0.68, 0.89) | < 0.001 |
| IS | ||||||
| Cases | 5883 | 6947 | 8328 | 10,708 | 10,801 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 6.5 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 5.6 | 5.1 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.05) | 0.92 (0.88, 0.96) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (0.96, 1.04) | 0.98 (0.94, 1.02) | 0.91 (0.86, 0.95) | 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.01 (0.97, 1.04) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | 0.91 (0.87, 0.96) | 0.86 (0.81, 0.92) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | ||||||
| Cases | 5433 | 4141 | 3619 | 2493 | 1726 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.7 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.89, 0.97) | 1.00 (0.95, 1.05) | 0.86 (0.80, 0.92) | 0.82 (0.74, 0.92) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.91 (0.87, 0.95) | 0.92 (0.88, 0.97) | 0.80 (0.74, 0.86) | 0.82 (0.74, 0.92) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.91 (0.87, 0.96) | 0.93 (0.88, 0.98) | 0.81 (0.75, 0.87) | 0.85 (0.76, 0.94) | < 0.001 |
Incidence density was adjusted for age at recruitment, sex and survey sites. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models with stratification on survey sites and age-at-risk (5-year groups). Model 1 was adjusted for sex, age at recruitment, education level. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, the average daily energy intake, spicy food, family history of CVD or diabetes, body mass index, and waist circumference. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for prevalent diabetes, antihypertensive drugs use, and systolic blood pressure. Tests for linear trend were conducted by assigning the median value to each quintile and modelling it as a continuous variable in the Cox model
CVD: cardiovascular disease. MCE: major coronary events. HS: haemorrhagic stroke. IS: ischaemic stroke. PY: person year
* Analyses were performed among 451,846 diabetic participants
Hazard ratios of cardiometabolic diseases by quintiles of the modern dietary pattern among 477,465 participants
| Endpoints | Modern dietary pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | ||
| CVD | ||||||
| Cases | 30,630 | 28,772 | 27,420 | 26,337 | 24,556 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 25.4 | 25.1 | 25.3 | 25.2 | 23.8 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.99 (0.98, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) | 0.99 (0.97, 1.01) | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.97 (0.96, 0.99) | 0.95 (0.93, 0.97) | 0.92 (0.89, 0.94) | 0.87 (0.84, 0.90) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.98 (0.97, 1.00) | 0.96 (0.94, 0.98) | 0.93 (0.91, 0.96) | 0.89 (0.86, 0.92) | < 0.001 |
| MCE | ||||||
| Cases | 2193 | 1712 | 1618 | 1637 | 1710 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 1.0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.7 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.92 (0.86, 0.99) | 0.92 (0.86, 0.99) | 0.90 (0.83, 0.97) | 0.81 (0.74, 0.88) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.87, 1.00) | 0.92 (0.85, 1.00) | 0.90 (0.81, 0.99) | 0.85 (0.75, 0.96) | 0.014 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) | 0.93 (0.86, 1.01) | 0.91 (0.83, 1.00) | 0.88 (0.77, 0.99) | 0.046 |
| HS | ||||||
| Cases | 2888 | 2393 | 1993 | 1473 | 1011 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 0.8 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.88, 0.99) | 0.88 (0.82, 0.93) | 0.78 (0.73, 0.84) | 0.61 (0.56, 0.67) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) | 0.86 (0.80, 0.93) | 0.76 (0.69, 0.84) | 0.60 (0.53, 0.69) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.96 (0.90, 1.02) | 0.90 (0.84, 0.97) | 0.83 (0.75, 0.91) | 0.67 (0.59, 0.77) | < 0.001 |
| IS | ||||||
| Cases | 9729 | 7853 | 7720 | 9055 | 8310 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 6.1 | 6.1 | 6.0 | 6.2 | 5.4 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 1.00 (0.97, 1.03) | 0.99 (0.96, 1.03) | 1.02 (0.98, 1.06) | 0.90 (0.87, 0.94) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.01) | 0.94 (0.90, 0.97) | 0.93 (0.89, 0.98) | 0.82 (0.77, 0.86) | < 0.001 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.99 (0.96, 1.02) | 0.95 (0.92, 0.99) | 0.95 (0.91, 1.00) | 0.85 (0.80, 0.89) | < 0.001 |
| Diabetes | ||||||
| Cases | 3014 | 3737 | 3931 | 3625 | 3105 | |
| Incidence density (1/1000 PYs) | 2.9 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 3.1 | 3.2 | |
| Model 1 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.97 (0.92, 1.02) | 1.03 (0.98, 1.08) | 1.07 (1.01, 1.13) | 1.12 (1.05, 1.20) | < 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.88, 0.98) | 0.93 (0.87, 0.98) | 0.88 (0.82, 0.94) | 0.88 (0.80, 0.96) | 0.009 |
| Model 3 | 1.00 (Ref.) | 0.93 (0.88, 0.98) | 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) | 0.88 (0.82, 0.94) | 0.89 (0.81, 0.97) | 0.015 |
Incidence density was adjusted for age at recruitment, sex and survey sites. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models with stratification on survey sites and age-at-risk (5-year groups). Model 1 was adjusted for sex, age at recruitment, education level. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, the average daily energy intake, spicy food, family history of CVD or diabetes, body mass index, and waist circumference. Model 3 was additionally adjusted for prevalent diabetes, antihypertensive drugs use, and systolic blood pressure. Tests for linear trend were conducted by assigning the median value to each quintile and modelling it as a continuous variable in the Cox model
CVD: cardiovascular disease. MCE: major coronary events. HS: haemorrhagic stroke. IS: ischaemic stroke. PY: person year
* Analyses were performed among 451,846 diabetic participants
Fig. 1Hazard ratios of selected cardiovascular diseases according to the joint classification of dietary patterns. Hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated using Cox models with stratification on survey sites and age-at-risk (5-year groups), and adjustment for sex, age at recruitment, education level, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, the average daily energy intake, spicy food, family history of CVD or diabetes, body mass index, waist circumference, prevalent diabetes, antihypertensive drugs use, and systolic blood pressure. CVD: cardiovascular disease. MCE: major coronary events. HS: haemorrhagic stroke. IS: ischaemic stroke. P values for interaction of two dietary patterns were < 0.001, 0.818, 0.012, 0.261, and 0.142, respectively