Literature DB >> 34478440

On the inference of complex phylogenetic networks by Markov Chain Monte-Carlo.

Charles-Elie Rabier1,2,3, Vincent Berry2, Marnus Stoltz1, João D Santos4,5, Wensheng Wang6, Jean-Christophe Glaszmann4,5, Fabio Pardi2, Celine Scornavacca1.   

Abstract

For various species, high quality sequences and complete genomes are nowadays available for many individuals. This makes data analysis challenging, as methods need not only to be accurate, but also time efficient given the tremendous amount of data to process. In this article, we introduce an efficient method to infer the evolutionary history of individuals under the multispecies coalescent model in networks (MSNC). Phylogenetic networks are an extension of phylogenetic trees that can contain reticulate nodes, which allow to model complex biological events such as horizontal gene transfer, hybridization and introgression. We present a novel way to compute the likelihood of biallelic markers sampled along genomes whose evolution involved such events. This likelihood computation is at the heart of a Bayesian network inference method called SnappNet, as it extends the Snapp method inferring evolutionary trees under the multispecies coalescent model, to networks. SnappNet is available as a package of the well-known beast 2 software. Recently, the MCMC_BiMarkers method, implemented in PhyloNet, also extended Snapp to networks. Both methods take biallelic markers as input, rely on the same model of evolution and sample networks in a Bayesian framework, though using different methods for computing priors. However, SnappNet relies on algorithms that are exponentially more time-efficient on non-trivial networks. Using simulations, we compare performances of SnappNet and MCMC_BiMarkers. We show that both methods enjoy similar abilities to recover simple networks, but SnappNet is more accurate than MCMC_BiMarkers on more complex network scenarios. Also, on complex networks, SnappNet is found to be extremely faster than MCMC_BiMarkers in terms of time required for the likelihood computation. We finally illustrate SnappNet performances on a rice data set. SnappNet infers a scenario that is consistent with previous results and provides additional understanding of rice evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34478440      PMCID: PMC8445492          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  62 in total

1.  Inferring species trees directly from biallelic genetic markers: bypassing gene trees in a full coalescent analysis.

Authors:  David Bryant; Remco Bouckaert; Joseph Felsenstein; Noah A Rosenberg; Arindam RoyChoudhury
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Phylogenomics reveals extensive reticulate evolution in Xiphophorus fishes.

Authors:  Rongfeng Cui; Molly Schumer; Karla Kruesi; Ronald Walter; Peter Andolfatto; Gil G Rosenthal
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A two-stage pruning algorithm for likelihood computation for a population tree.

Authors:  Arindam RoyChoudhury; Joseph Felsenstein; Elizabeth A Thompson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-09-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Posterior Summarization in Bayesian Phylogenetics Using Tracer 1.7.

Authors:  Andrew Rambaut; Alexei J Drummond; Dong Xie; Guy Baele; Marc A Suchard
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  A survey of combinatorial methods for phylogenetic networks.

Authors:  Daniel H Huson; Celine Scornavacca
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.416

6.  Publisher Correction: The origin and remolding of genomic islands of differentiation in the European sea bass.

Authors:  Maud Duranton; François Allal; Christelle Fraïsse; Nicolas Bierne; François Bonhomme; Pierre-Alexandre Gagnaire
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Role of genetic introgression during the evolution of cultivated rice (Oryza sativa L.).

Authors:  Peter Civáň; Terence A Brown
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis.

Authors:  Remco Bouckaert; Timothy G Vaughan; Joëlle Barido-Sottani; Sebastián Duchêne; Mathieu Fourment; Alexandra Gavryushkina; Joseph Heled; Graham Jones; Denise Kühnert; Nicola De Maio; Michael Matschiner; Fábio K Mendes; Nicola F Müller; Huw A Ogilvie; Louis du Plessis; Alex Popinga; Andrew Rambaut; David Rasmussen; Igor Siveroni; Marc A Suchard; Chieh-Hsi Wu; Dong Xie; Chi Zhang; Tanja Stadler; Alexei J Drummond
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Bayesian Inference of Reticulate Phylogenies under the Multispecies Network Coalescent.

Authors:  Dingqiao Wen; Yun Yu; Luay Nakhleh
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Inferring Phylogenetic Networks with Maximum Pseudolikelihood under Incomplete Lineage Sorting.

Authors:  Claudia Solís-Lemus; Cécile Ané
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  2 in total

1.  Treewidth-based algorithms for the small parsimony problem on networks.

Authors:  Celine Scornavacca; Mathias Weller
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2022-08-20       Impact factor: 1.721

Review 2.  Recent progress on methods for estimating and updating large phylogenies.

Authors:  Paul Zaharias; Tandy Warnow
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 6.671

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.