| Literature DB >> 34477156 |
Junhong Liu1, Xiao Song, Shuangshuang Zheng, Hui Ding, Honggang Wang, Xicai Sun, Xiangfeng Ren.
Abstract
ABSTRACT: Currently no research is available on muscle and functional performance of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in China, even though both diseases have been reported to damage motor function.This single-center prospective study involves 55 males with COPD and T2DM and 46 males with COPD. Lung function, muscle strength and endurance of the upper limbs, and quadriceps strength of both legs were assessed using instruments. The 6-min walk (6MW) test was performed to evaluate physical performance.Between the two groups, respiratory function of COPD patients with T2DM was worse than in those without (P < .05). Mean handgrip strength and muscle endurance of upper limbs and mean quadriceps strength at both 60°/s and 120°/s in COPD males with T2DM was also significantly less (P < .05). Mean 6MW distances of COPD patients with T2DM were significantly worse (P < .05), and mean pulse rate (PR) increments of COPD patients with T2DM in 6MW test were significantly higher (P < .05).The combination of COPD and T2DM not only brings one more chronic disease to elderly patients but also significantly affects muscle strength and endurance as well as physical performance. Accordingly, in the management of chronic diseases, we recommend that clinicians as well as patients themselves actively control blood sugar and review them regularly with a view to reducing adverse effects on physical performance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34477156 PMCID: PMC8415924 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Figure 1Flowchart showing the research process.
Clinical Characters of COPD only and COPD with T2D patients.
| Parameter | COPD only | COPD wih T2DM | |
| Age (yr) | 69.2 ± 6.4 | 70.5 ± 6.7 | .340 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.9 ± 2.5 | 26.2 ± 3.0 | .512 |
| Smoke history(n, %) | 24 (52.2%) | 38 (56.4%) | .748 |
| FEV1 (L) | 1.6 ± 0.2 | 1.7 ± 60.2 | .012 |
| FEV1/FVC (%) | 64.7 ± 6.5 | 59.8 ± 5.3 | <.001 |
| FEV1/P (%) | 52.4 ± 7.4 | 49.8 ± 6.9 | <.001 |
BMI = body mass index, FEV1/P(%) = FEV1% predicted value, FEV1 = forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FVC = forced vital capacity in liters.
Figure 2Upper limb muscle strength & endurance and quadriceps strength comparisons The handgrip muscle strength was recorded in kilograms. And the handgrip endurance was measured by asking the subjects to maintain their grip on the handgrip dynamometer at one-third of their maximum handgrip strength for as long as they could, witch unit is second. The peak torque in newton-meters (N m) was measured at at 60°/s and 120°/s to represent the quadriceps strength. And the results showed a combination of two legs. All results are the highest of the measured values.
Detailed results of the 6-min walk test between two groups.
| Parameter | COPD only | COPD wih T2DM | |
| 6MWD(m) | 380.8 ± 34.7 | 356.3 ± 38.7 | .001 |
| SpO2 (%) before test | 96.1 ± 1.1 | 95.5 ± 0.9 | .004 |
| SpO2 (%) after test | 93.6 ± 1.5 | 92.9 ± 1.3 | .032 |
| SpO2 (%) reduction | 2.5 ± 1.9 | 2.6 ± 1.6 | .903 |
| PR(beats/min)before test | 79.5 ± 7.0 | 77.5 ± 5.7 | .123 |
| PR(beats/min)after test | 110.1 ± 6.7 | 112.2 ± 6.5 | .101 |
| PR(beats/min)increment | 30.5 ± 9.2 | 34.7 ± 9.4 | .028 |
| Brog scale before test | 4.2 ± 1.3 | 4.1 ± 1.3 | .688 |
| Brog scale after test | 5.6 ± 0.9 | 5.7 ± 0.8 | .475 |
| Brog scale increment | 1.4 ± 1.3 | 1.7 ± 1.3 | .400 |
6MWD = 6-min walk distance, PR = Pulse Rate, SpO2 = Blood oxygen saturation levels.