Literature DB >> 34476858

Comparison of food and nutrient intake in infants aged 6-12 months, following baby-led or traditional weaning: A cross-sectional study.

Jo Pearce1, Simon C Langley-Evans2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A baby-led approach to weaning (BLW) encompasses self-feeding and self-selecting graspable foods, offering an alternative to traditional weaning (TW). This cross-sectional study explored adherence to characteristics of BLW and differences in food group exposure and nutrient intake between babies following either TW or BLW.
METHODS: Nutritional data were collected via multiple-pass 24-h recall, following parental completion of an online survey.
RESULTS: Infants were grouped according to age (6-8 months; TW [n = 36] and BLW [n = 24]) and (9-12 months; TW [n = 24] and BLW [n = 12]). BLW babies were more likely to be breast fed (p = 0.002), consumed a higher percentage of foods also consumed by their mother (p = 0.008) and were fed less purees (p < 0.001) at 6-8 months. TW babies were spoon fed more (p ≤ 0.001) at all ages. Amongst babies aged 6-8 months, total intake (from complementary food plus milk) of iron (p = 0.021), zinc (p = 0.048), iodine (p = 0.031), vitamin B12 (p = 0.002) and vitamin D (p = 0.042) and both vitamin B12 (p = 0.027) and vitamin D (p = 0.035) from complementary food alone was higher in babies following TW. Compared to TW, BLW babies aged 6-8 months had a higher percentage energy intake from fat (p = 0.043) and saturated fat (p = 0.026) from their milk. No differences in nutrient intake were observed amongst infants aged 9-12 months. Few differences were observed between groups in their number of exposures to specific food groups.
CONCLUSIONS: TW infants had higher intakes of key micronutrients at 6-8 months, although there were few differences in nutritional intake at 9-12 months or food group exposure between babies following TW or BLW. BLW appears to be socially desirable. Guidance for parents is required, along with larger, longer-term studies, which explore the potential impact of BLW in later childhood.
© 2021 The British Dietetic Association Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  baby-led weaning; complementary feeding; dietary intake; infant feeding; solid foods; weaning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34476858     DOI: 10.1111/jhn.12947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet        ISSN: 0952-3871            Impact factor:   3.089


  4 in total

1.  Use of the Baby-Led Weaning (BLW) Method in Complementary Feeding of the Infant-A Cross-Sectional Study of Mothers Using and Not Using the BLW Method.

Authors:  Agnieszka Białek-Dratwa; Monika Soczewka; Mateusz Grajek; Elżbieta Szczepańska; Oskar Kowalski
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 6.706

Review 2.  Early life programming of health and disease: The long-term consequences of obesity in pregnancy.

Authors:  Simon C Langley-Evans
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.995

3.  Estimated energy and nutrient intake for infants following baby-led and traditional weaning approaches.

Authors:  Hannah Rowan; Michelle Lee; Amy Brown
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.995

4.  Complementary feeding: Should baby be leading the way?

Authors:  Simon C Langley-Evans
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-01-23       Impact factor: 2.995

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.