Naiara Korta Martiartu1, Dominik Nakhostin1, Lisa Ruby1, Thomas Frauenfelder1, Marga B Rominger1, Sergio J Sanabria1,2. 1. Zurich Ultrasound Research and Translation (ZURT), Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. 2. Deusto Institute of Technology, University of Deusto/IKERBASQUE, Basque Foundation for Science, Bilbao, Basque Country, Spain.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was threefold: (I) to study the correlation of speed-of-sound (SoS) and shear-wave-speed (SWS) ultrasound (US) in the gastrocnemius muscle, (II) to use reproducible tissue compression to characterize tissue nonlinearity effects, and (III) to compare the potential of SoS and SWS for tissue composition assessment. METHODS: Twenty gastrocnemius muscles of 10 healthy young subjects (age range, 23-34 years, two females and eight males) were prospectively examined with both clinical SWS (GE Logiq E9, in m/s) and a prototype system that measures SoS (in m/s). A reflector was positioned opposite the US probe as a timing reference for SoS, with the muscle in between. Reproducible tissue compression was applied by reducing probe-reflector distance in 5 mm steps. The Ogden hyperelastic model and the acoustoelastic theory were used to characterize SoS and SWS variations with tissue compression and extract novel metrics related to tissue nonlinearity. The body fat percentage (BF%) of the subjects was estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis. RESULTS: A weak negative correlation was observed between SWS and SoS (r=-0.28, P=0.002). SWS showed an increasing trend with increasing tissue compression (P=0.10) while SoS values decayed nonlinearly (P<0.001). The acoustoelastic modeling showed a weak correlation for SWS (r=-0.36, P<0.001) but a very strong correlation for SoS (r=0.86, P<0.001), which was used to extract the SoS acoustoelastic parameter. SWS showed higher variability between both calves [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.62, P=0.08] than SoS (ICC =0.91, P<0.001). Correlations with BF% were strong and positive for SWS (r=0.60, P<0.001), moderate and negative for SoS (r=-0.43, P=0.05), and moderate positive for SoS acoustoelastic parameter (r=0.48, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SWS and SoS provide independent information about tissue elastic properties. SWS correlated stronger with BF% than SoS, but measurements were less reliable. SoS enabled the extraction of novel metrics related to tissue nonlinearity with potential complementary information. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was threefold: (I) to study the correlation of speed-of-sound (SoS) and shear-wave-speed (SWS) ultrasound (US) in the gastrocnemius muscle, (II) to use reproducible tissue compression to characterize tissue nonlinearity effects, and (III) to compare the potential of SoS and SWS for tissue composition assessment. METHODS: Twenty gastrocnemius muscles of 10 healthy young subjects (age range, 23-34 years, two females and eight males) were prospectively examined with both clinical SWS (GE Logiq E9, in m/s) and a prototype system that measures SoS (in m/s). A reflector was positioned opposite the US probe as a timing reference for SoS, with the muscle in between. Reproducible tissue compression was applied by reducing probe-reflector distance in 5 mm steps. The Ogden hyperelastic model and the acoustoelastic theory were used to characterize SoS and SWS variations with tissue compression and extract novel metrics related to tissue nonlinearity. The body fat percentage (BF%) of the subjects was estimated using bioelectrical impedance analysis. RESULTS: A weak negative correlation was observed between SWS and SoS (r=-0.28, P=0.002). SWS showed an increasing trend with increasing tissue compression (P=0.10) while SoS values decayed nonlinearly (P<0.001). The acoustoelastic modeling showed a weak correlation for SWS (r=-0.36, P<0.001) but a very strong correlation for SoS (r=0.86, P<0.001), which was used to extract the SoS acoustoelastic parameter. SWS showed higher variability between both calves [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) =0.62, P=0.08] than SoS (ICC =0.91, P<0.001). Correlations with BF% were strong and positive for SWS (r=0.60, P<0.001), moderate and negative for SoS (r=-0.43, P=0.05), and moderate positive for SoS acoustoelastic parameter (r=0.48, P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: SWS and SoS provide independent information about tissue elastic properties. SWS correlated stronger with BF% than SoS, but measurements were less reliable. SoS enabled the extraction of novel metrics related to tissue nonlinearity with potential complementary information. 2021 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.
Authors: Francesco Landi; Andrea Russo; Rosa Liperoti; Marco Pahor; Matteo Tosato; Ettore Capoluongo; Roberto Bernabei; Graziano Onder Journal: Clin Nutr Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 7.324
Authors: Mihra S Taljanovic; Lana H Gimber; Giles W Becker; L Daniel Latt; Andrea S Klauser; David M Melville; Liang Gao; Russell S Witte Journal: Radiographics Date: 2017 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.333
Authors: Harald Kramer; Perry J Pickhardt; Mark A Kliewer; Diego Hernando; Guang-Hong Chen; James A Zagzebski; Scott B Reeder Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2016-10-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Assad A Oberai; Nachiket H Gokhale; Sevan Goenezen; Paul E Barbone; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Jingfeng Jiang Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Peggy Mannen Cawthon; Kathleen M Fox; Shravanthi R Gandra; Matthew J Delmonico; Chiun-Fang Chiou; Mary S Anthony; Ase Sewall; Bret Goodpaster; Suzanne Satterfield; Steven R Cummings; Tamara B Harris Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Marion Imbault; Marco Dioguardi Burgio; Alex Faccinetto; Maxime Ronot; Hanna Bendjador; Thomas Deffieux; Emma Ollivier Triquet; Pierre-Emmanuel Rautou; Laurent Castera; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Valérie Vilgrain; Mickael Tanter Journal: Phys Med Biol Date: 2018-10-26 Impact factor: 3.609
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Gülistan Bahat; Jürgen Bauer; Yves Boirie; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Cyrus Cooper; Francesco Landi; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Stéphane M Schneider; Cornel C Sieber; Eva Topinkova; Maurits Vandewoude; Marjolein Visser; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.668