| Literature DB >> 34476027 |
Wanglin Zhang1,2, Zhigang Wang1,2, Mu Chen1, Yuchan Li1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for ankle valgus in children with hereditary multiple exostoses (HME).Entities:
Keywords: ankle valgus; hereditary multiple exostoses; risk factors
Year: 2021 PMID: 34476027 PMCID: PMC8381398 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.15.210032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Child Orthop ISSN: 1863-2521 Impact factor: 1.548
Fig. 1The lateral distal tibial angle is measured as the angle between the long axis of the tibia and the articular surface of the tibial plafond (red line); the tibial length is measured from the plateau to the plafond, the fibula length is measured from the apex of the fibular head to the distal tip of the lateral malleolus (yellow line). The fibula/tibia length ratio is calculated by dividing the fibula length by the tibia length. We use a rectangle to enclose all exostoses around the proximal fibula and measure the length of the rectangular transverse axis. The fibular neck/physis width ratio = A/B.
Intra and interobserver repeatability for the variables
| Variables | Intraobserver reliability (95%CI) | Interobserver reliability (95%CI) | Measure |
|---|---|---|---|
| MAD | 0.986 (0.966 to 1.006) | 0.953 (0.916 to 0.989) | QWK |
| LDTA | 0.965 (0.949 to 0.976) | 0.810 (0.736 to 0.865) | ICC |
| F/T ratio | 0.905 (0.865 to 0.933) | 0.808 (0.698 to 0.881) | ICC |
| Malhotra’s grade | 0.970 (0.936 to 1.005) | 0.885 (0.822 to 0.948) | QWK |
| N/P ratio | 0.932 (0.903 to 0.952) | 0.825 (0.674 to 0.902) | ICC |
CI, confidence interval; MAD, mechanical axis deviation; QWK, Quadratic weighted kappa; LDTA, lateral distal tibia angle; ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient; F/T, fibula/tibia length; N/P ratio, fibular neck/physis width
Lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) at different sites involved in exostoses of the ankle joint
| Location of exostoses | Number of ankles | LDTA | Comparison between involved sites | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No exostosis (A) | 35 | 86° | B | 0.028 |
| C | 0.072 | |||
| D | 0.000 | |||
| Lateral aspect of distal tibia only (B) | 42 | 83° | A | 0.028 |
| C | 0.899 | |||
| D | 0.004 | |||
| Medial aspect of distal fibula only (C) | 16 | 83° | A | 0.072 |
| B | 0.899 | |||
| D | 0.032 | |||
| Both distal tibia and fibula (D) | 29 | 79° | A | 0.000 |
| B | 0.004 | |||
| C | 0.032 |
Post hoc tests were used to compare the LDTA between different sites involved in exostoses of the ankle joint. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Risk factors associated with ankle valgus in hereditary multiple exostoses
| Predictor | Ankle valgus | p-value | Exp(B) | Exp (B) 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | Lower | Upper | |||
| Age | 0.000 | 1.371 | 1.173 | 1.602 | ||
| F/T ratio | 0.007 | 4.457 | 1.498 | 13.261 | ||
| ≥ 0.96 | 49 | 32 | ||||
| < 0.96 | 9 | 32 | ||||
| N/P ratio | 0.043 | 2.855 | 1.031 | 7.907 | ||
| ≤ 1.6 | 38 | 24 | ||||
| > 1.6 | 20 | 40 | ||||
| Location of exostoses | ||||||
| A | 24 | 11 | 0.111 | |||
| B/C | 27 | 31 | 0.441 | |||
| D | 7 | 22 | 0.040 | 4.091 | 1.065 | 15.712 |
| MAD | ||||||
| Zone (-1, -2) | 7 | 2 | 0.950 | |||
| Zone (0, 1) | 41 | 39 | 0.959 | |||
| Zone (2, 3) | 10 | 23 | 0.908 | |||
CI, confidence interval; F/T, fibula/tibia length; N/P, fibular neck/physis width; A, no exostoses; B, lateral aspect of distal tibia only; C, medial aspect of distal fibula only; D, both distal tibia and fibula; MAD, mechanical axis deviation; Exp(B), exponentiation of the B coefficient
Fig. 2There was a significant negative association between Malhotra grade and lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA). Patients with Malhotra grade III have the smallest LDTA.