| Literature DB >> 34475959 |
Ahmad Jabir Rahyussalim1,2,3, Ahmad Nugroho1, Muhammad Luqman Labib Zufar1, Irfan Fathurrahman1, Tri Kurniawati2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vertebral bone defect represents one of the most commonly found skeletal problems in the spine. Progressive increase of vertebral involvement of skeletal tuberculosis (TB) is reported as the main cause, especially in developed countries. Conventional spinal fusion using bone graft has been associated with donor-site morbidity and complications. We reported the utilization of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) combined with hydroxyapatite (HA) based scaffolds in treating vertebral bone defect due to spondylitis tuberculosis.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34475959 PMCID: PMC8407992 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9928379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Patient characteristics.
| Case | Gender | Age | Affected region | Diagnosis | Previous surgery |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 29 | L1-L2 vertebrae | Implant failure with history of paraparesis due to compression fracture of L1-L2 vertebrae due to spondylitis tuberculosis Frankel D | Debridement, decompression, and posterior stabilization of L1-L2 vertebrae |
| 2 | Male | 27 | L3-L4 vertebrae | Back pain and leg pain due to spondylitis TB of L3-L4 with paravertebral abscess Frankel E | — |
| 3 | Female | 30 | T8-L1 vertebrae | Implant failure with exposed implant of T8-L1 due to spondylitis TB Frankel C | Debridement, decompression, and posterior stabilization of T8-L1 vertebrae |
Figure 1Twenty million umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) and hydroxyapatite-based scaffolds used in the procedure.
Figure 2Lumbotomy approach with (a) left lateral skin incision to assess (b) thoracolumbar vertebral level.
Figure 3UC-MSCs and hydroxyapatite-based scaffold application on the vertebral bone defect area.
Figure 4A 29-year-old female (case 1). (a) Preoperative radiography showed large destruction on the corpus vertebrae which causes nonunion and implant failure. (b) Early postoperative radiography showed implant planted posteriorly bridging defected bone with alignment well corrected. (c) Three-month postoperative radiography showed 60% of new bone growth on the defected corpus vertebrae. (d) Six-month postoperative radiography showed 80% of new bone growth on the defected corpus vertebrae. (e) Six-month postoperative CT scan showed 80% of new bone growth filling the bone defect especially on the right posterior lateral. Sites are shown using white and black arrows.
Figure 5A 27-year-old male (case 2). (a) Preoperative clinical picture showed hyperlordosis. (b) Preoperative radiography showed defect on the anterior column around 55% of the corpus vertebrae. (c) One-month postoperative radiography showed new bone formation that filled around 35% of the corpus vertebrae. (d) Three-month postoperative radiography showed new bone formation that filled around 60% of the corpus vertebrae. (e) Six-month postoperative CT scan showed 60% of new bone formation on the left posterior lateral of the corpus vertebrae. Sites are shown using white and black arrows.
Figure 6A 30-year-old female (case 3). (a) Preoperative radiography showed defects on multiple corpus vertebrae (T9-12). (b) One-month postoperative radiography showed around 50% of new bone formation along T9-L1, and postoperative radiography also showed instrumentation planted on the left side. (c) Three-month postoperative radiography showed around 65% of new bone formation. (d) Six-month postoperative radiography showed around 85% of new bone formation. (e) Six-month postoperative CT scan showed around 85% of new bone formation. Sites are within yellow circles and pointed using white, black, and blue arrows.
The effect of UC-MSC implantation for vertebral bone defect due to spondylitis tuberculosis.
| Case | Pre-op | 1 month | 3 months | 6 months | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALP | SF-36 | X-ray | ALP | SF-36 | X-ray | CT scan | ALP | SF-36 | X-ray | CT scan | ALP | SF-36 | |
| 1 | 40 U/L | 850 | T1 | 45 U/L | 1040 | T3 | B2 | 95 U/L | 1780 | T3 | B2 | 79 U/L | 1985 |
| 2 | 46 U/L | 900 | T0 | 58 U/L | 1090 | T2 | B3 | 106 U/L | 2800 | T3 | B2 | 77 U/L | 2995 |
| 3 | 38 U/L | 460 | T0 | 42 U/L | 690 | T2 | B2 | 90 U/L | 1880 | T4 | B1 | 85 U/L | 2830 |
| Mean ± SD | 41.3 ± 4.16 U/L | 736.67 ± 240.90 | 48.33 ± 8.50 U/L | 940 ± 217.94 | 97 ± 8.19 U/L | 2340 ± 650.54 | 90.33 ± 4.16 U/L | 2912.5 ± 116.67 | |||||