Literature DB >> 3447343

Discrimination of differences in speed and flicker rate depends on directionally selective mechanisms.

T Pasternak1.   

Abstract

The present study compared discriminations of differences in speed to differences in temporal frequency and examined the role of directionally selective mechanisms in such discriminations. In measuring the contrast dependence of speed and temporal frequency discriminations two different techniques were used to reduce the role of directionally selective mechanisms. The first was the virtual elimination of directional selectivity in the visual cortex of cats by stroboscopic rearing. The second was the reduction of directional sensitivity in normal humans and cats by testing with gratings of high spatial and low temporal frequency. Discrimination of the temporal frequency of sinusoidal gratings flickered in counterphase was worse than discrimination of speeds of moving gratings. Under conditions that maximize the sensitivity of directional mechanisms (low spatial, moderate temporal frequency) Weber fractions for speed and flicker in all normal observers (cats and humans) were constant at higher contrast and increased only as contrast began to approach threshold. In strobe-reared cats sensitivity for direction was 10 times lower than sensitivity for detection. They were able to discriminate speeds and temporal frequencies only at contrasts that exceeded contrast threshold for direction. This was also true for a normal cat whose sensitivity for direction was reduced by increasing the spatial frequency of the grating. In all cases Weber fractions for flicker as a function of contrast were greater than but paralleled those for speed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3447343     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(87)90054-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Aging and visual motion discrimination in normal adults and schizophrenia patients.

Authors:  L Cinnamon Bidwell; Philip S Holzman; Yue Chen
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2006-10-25       Impact factor: 3.222

2.  Common rules guide comparisons of speed and direction of motion in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Cory R Hussar; Tatiana Pasternak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Increased Visual Sensitivity and Occipital Activity in Patients With Hemianopia Following Vision Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Sara Ajina; Kristin Jünemann; Arash Sahraie; Holly Bridge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Cortical dynamics subserving visual apparent motion.

Authors:  Bashir Ahmed; Akitoshi Hanazawa; Calle Undeman; David Eriksson; Sonata Valentiniene; Per E Roland
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Effects of strobe light stimulation on postnatal developing rat retina.

Authors:  Jung-A Shin; Eojin Jeong; In-Beom Kim; Hwa-Young Lee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.