Literature DB >> 34473256

Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

Kevin Yau1,2, Kento T Abe3,4, David Naimark1, Matthew J Oliver1, Jeffrey Perl2,5, Jerome A Leis1,6, Shelly Bolotin7,8,9, Vanessa Tran8,9, Sarah I Mullin1, Ellen Shadowitz1, Anny Gonzalez1, Tatjana Sukovic1, Julie Garnham-Takaoka5, Keelia Quinn de Launay4, Alyson Takaoka5, Sharon E Straus5, Allison J McGeer10, Christopher T Chan11, Karen Colwill4, Anne-Claude Gingras3,4, Michelle A Hladunewich1.   

Abstract

Importance: Patients undergoing hemodialysis have a high mortality rate associated with COVID-19, and this patient population often has a poor response to vaccinations. Randomized clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines included few patients with kidney disease; therefore, vaccine immunogenicity is uncertain in this population. Objective: To evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis following 1 vs 2 doses of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination compared with health care workers serving as controls and convalescent serum. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, single-center cohort study was conducted between February 2 and April 17, 2021, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants included 142 patients receiving in-center hemodialysis and 35 health care worker controls. Exposures: BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine. Main Outcomes and Measures: SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike), receptor binding domain (anti-RBD), and nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP).
Results: Among the 142 participants undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, 94 (66%) were men; median age was 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured in 66 patients receiving 1 vaccine dose following a public health policy change, 76 patients receiving 2 vaccine doses, and 35 health care workers receiving 2 vaccine doses. Detectable anti-NP suggestive of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 15 of 142 (11%) patients at baseline, and only 3 patients had prior COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing. Two additional patients contracted COVID-19 after receiving 2 doses of vaccine. In 66 patients receiving a single BNT162b2 dose, seroconversion occurred in 53 (80%) for anti-spike and 36 (55%) for anti-RBD by 28 days postdose, but a robust response, defined by reaching the median levels of antibodies in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors, was noted in only 15 patients (23%) for anti-spike and 4 (6%) for anti-RBD in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors. In patients receiving 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, seroconversion occurred in 69 of 72 (96%) for anti-spike and 63 of 72 (88%) for anti-RBD by 2 weeks following the second dose and median convalescent serum levels were reached in 52 of 72 patients (72%) for anti-spike and 43 of 72 (60%) for anti-RBD. In contrast, all 35 health care workers exceeded the median level of anti-spike and anti-RBD found in convalescent serum 2 to 4 weeks after the second dose. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests poor immunogenicity 28 days following a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in the hemodialysis population, supporting adherence to recommended vaccination schedules and avoiding delay of the second dose in these at-risk individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34473256      PMCID: PMC8414193          DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Netw Open        ISSN: 2574-3805


Introduction

SARS-CoV-2 with resultant COVID-19 has resulted in a global pandemic. Among those most severely affected are patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who must visit facilities at least thrice weekly for life-sustaining treatment resulting in a 5 times greater risk for infection than the general population.[1] Despite adherence to public health guidance, outbreaks have occurred in dialysis units.[2] Furthermore, patients receiving hemodialysis are at greater risk for severe COVID-19, with 63% of patients receiving chronic hemodialysis who contract COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and a case fatality rate of 29% in Ontario, Canada.[1] Confirmatory data from the US Renal Data System found mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis in early 2020 was 16% to 37% higher than in 2017-2019.[3] Patients receiving hemodialysis frequently have a diminished immune response to vaccination compared with the general population, as observed during hepatitis B vaccination.[4] Studies of natural COVID-19 infection in patients receiving hemodialysis found waning antibody concentrations by 3 months, raising the possibility that patients receiving hemodialysis may not develop an adequate vaccination response.[5] In addition, randomized clinical trials for the BNT162b2 vaccine included few patients with kidney disease.[6] Therefore, data on vaccine immunogenicity are lacking in this high-risk population. Two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were administered 21 days apart in randomized clinical trials. However, owing to vaccine shortages, some countries, including the UK and Canada, have prioritized first-dose vaccination of the general population[7] while delaying the second dose for up to 3 to 4 months, offering a natural experiment for comparison of 1 vs 2 doses. To investigate the humoral response conferred by COVID-19 vaccination in the hemodialysis population, we conducted a prospective observational cohort study measuring SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels following 1 vs 2 doses of the vaccine.

Methods

In-center patients aged 18 years or older receiving hemodialysis, including those with prior COVID-19, were eligible for this single-center, prospective cohort study to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 antibody response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Recruitment of 142 participants occurred between February 2 and March 3, 2021, at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and the study was completed on April 17, 2021. A subset of patients (n = 76) received 2 doses of vaccine, with the second dose a mean of 21 days (range, 19-28) following the first dose, and 66 patients received a single vaccine dose due to a public health policy change. In the 2-dose group, baseline was prior to the second dose and antibody levels were determined weekly until 14 days after the second vaccine dose. In those receiving a single vaccine dose, antibody levels were measured at baseline before vaccination and 28 days following the first dose. A written questionnaire captured vaccination-related adverse events. Health care worker (HCW) controls received 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine with antibodies measured 2 to 4 weeks following the second dose. This study was approved by the Sunnybrook Health Sciences and Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cohort studies. Antibodies targeting the full-length spike protein (anti-spike) and its receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) measured humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and/or natural infection; antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP) detected natural SARS-CoV-2 infection because this antigen is not targeted by the BNT162b2 vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured on a custom automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platform; the sensitivity and specificity of each assay were determined by precision-recall analysis from pre-COVID-19–negative and convalescent controls.[8,9] Antibody levels are reported as relative ratios to a synthetic standard included as a calibration curve on each assay plate. Thresholds for positivity (seroconversion) were determined by aggregating data from negative controls and calculating the mean ±3 SDs. Relative antibody levels were also compared with the median levels of convalescent serum obtained 21 to 115 days after symptom onset in patients with COVID-19; expression of vaccination-induced antibody levels to convalescent individuals helps to define correlates of protection.[10]

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics were compared using a t test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. The association between reactogenicity following the second vaccine dose and anti-spike or anti-RBD seroconversion was assessed by a χ2 test. Antibody relative ratios between patients undergoing hemodialysis receiving 2 doses of vaccine and HCWs were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Given the nonnormal distribution of relative ratios, which was not mitigated by log transformation, we set ratios with seroconversion above or below the median convalescent level as binary outcomes and used logistic regression to assess age, sex, and vaccine reactogenicity. Vaccine reactogenicity was binary in the model based on the presence of any of the following symptoms within 14 days after the second vaccine dose: pain, redness, swelling, fever, chills, fatigue, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, and joint pain. Simple imputation with the mean value across participants was used to address missing covariate data. With 2-sided testing, P < .05 was considered significant for all statistical findings. All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 17 (IBM Corp), and the multivariate logistic regression was performed using R, version 4.0.4 (R Project for Statistical Computing).

Results

Among 142 of 157 consenting patients (90%) receiving in-center hemodialysis, the median age was 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years. Of these, 94 were men (66%) and 48 were women (34%) (Table 1). At baseline, 15 patients (11%) had detectable anti-NP and 3 patients (2%) had reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID-19, indicating asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infection in 12 of 15 patients (80%), which was unexpected given the unit’s extensive screening protocols. Clinical characteristics of patients receiving 1 vs 2 vaccine doses were similar, but those with 1 dose were slightly younger (10 [15%] vs 9 [12%] aged ≤55 years) and less likely to have diabetes (26 [39%] vs 37 [49%]) or ischemic nephropathy (8 [12%] vs 19 [25%]) as the cause of kidney failure. This finding is not surprising because Canada prioritized 2-dose vaccination of older individuals in aggregate living settings. The HCW controls had a median age of 46 (interquartile range, 44-69) years, 33 of 35 (94%) were women, and 3 of 35 (9%) had prior COVID-19. Of 211 patients with convalescent serum, median age was 59 (interquartile range, 34-55) years, 115 were men (55%), and the sample included patients with mild (defined as not requiring hospitalization), moderate, and severe disease.
Table 1.

Clinical Characteristics of 142 Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Receiving BNT162b2 Vaccine

CharacteristicNo. (%)P valuea
Total (n = 142)1 Dose (n = 66)2 Doses (n = 76)
Age, median (IQR), y72 (62-79)72 (59-76)75 (64-82).04
Age group
≤55 y19 (13)10 (15)9 (12).41
>55 y123 (87)56 (85)67 (88)
Sex
Female48 (34)18 (27)30 (39).13
Male94 (66)48 (73)46 (61)
Prior COVID-19b3 (2)1 (2)2 (3)>.99
Positive baseline anti-NPc15 (11)3 (5)12 (16).05
Dialysis vintage, median (IQR), y2.65 (1.5-4.6)2.56 (1.2-4.8)2.6 (1.6-4.6).81
Cause of end-stage kidney disease
Diabetes 63 (44)26 (39)37 (49).03
Ischemic nephropathy27 (19)8 (12)19 (25)
Glomerulonephritis20 (14)13 (20)7 (9)
Other/unknown32 (22)19 (29)13 (17)
Comorbidities
Immunosuppressive treatmentd9 (6)5 (8)4 (5).41
Autoimmune disease8 (6)4 (6)4 (5).56
Diabetes 74 (52)29 (44)45 (59).07
Cancer23 (16)12 (18)11 (14).36
Coronary artery disease53 (37)22 (33)31 (41).62
Congestive heart failure37 (26)15 (23)22 (29).36
Chronic obstructive lung disease13 (9)5 (8)8 (11).81
Hypertension135 (95)65 (98)70 (92).12
Obesitye10 (7)2 (3)8 (11).08
Hepatitis B nonresponderf11 (8)3 (4)8 (11).16

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; NP, nucleocapsid protein.

A t test was used for continuous variables, and χ2 or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables.

Confirmed using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction.

Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with a threshold for positivity at 0.396. The baseline sample was taken before the first dose in the 1-dose group and before the second dose in the 2-dose group.

Defined as using any of the following: antimetabolite agent, calcineurin inhibitor, cytotoxic medications, rituximab in previous 6 months, tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibodies, or glucocorticoids at doses greater than prednisone, 5 mg/d.

Defined as body mass index greater than 30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared).

Defined as hepatitis B surface antibody less than 10 mIU/mL.

Abbreviations: IQR, interquartile range; NP, nucleocapsid protein. A t test was used for continuous variables, and χ2 or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables. Confirmed using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays with a threshold for positivity at 0.396. The baseline sample was taken before the first dose in the 1-dose group and before the second dose in the 2-dose group. Defined as using any of the following: antimetabolite agent, calcineurin inhibitor, cytotoxic medications, rituximab in previous 6 months, tumor necrosis factor monoclonal antibodies, or glucocorticoids at doses greater than prednisone, 5 mg/d. Defined as body mass index greater than 30 (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). Defined as hepatitis B surface antibody less than 10 mIU/mL. In 66 patients receiving 1 vaccine dose 4 weeks following the first vaccination, 53 (80%) seroconverted, but only 15 (23%) had anti-spike antibodies exceeding the median relative ratio of convalescent individuals (Table 2). In the 76 patients receiving 2 vaccine doses, the first dose similarly elicited anti-spike seroconversion in 65 patients (86%), with 19 (25%) reaching convalescent levels 28 days postdose. The second vaccine dose, however, induced a more robust response increase, with 43 of 76 patients (57%) reaching convalescent levels by 1 week, further increasing to 52 of 72 patients (72%) by 2 weeks and 69 of 72 patients (96%) reaching seroconversion (Figure 1).
Table 2.

Rates of Seroconversion and Attaining Convalescent Serum Levels for SARS-CoV-2 IgG Spike, RBD, and NP Antibodies

Study groupDoseaMeasurement pointNo. (%)
SeroconversionbConvalescent serum levelsc
Anti-spike
Hemodialysis1 DosePredose 18/66 (12)2/66 (3)
Dose 1 + 4 wk53/66 (80)15/66 (23)
2 DosesPredose 265/76 (86)19/76 (25)
Dose 2 + 1 wk72/76 (95)43/76 (57)
Dose 2 + 2 wk69/72 (96)52/72 (72)
Health care workers2 DosesDose 2 + 2-4 wk35/35 (100)35/35 (100)
Anti-RBD
Hemodialysis1 DosePredose 12/66 (3)1/66 (2)
Dose 1 + 4 wk36/66 (55)4/66 (6)
2 DosesPredose 231/76 (41)10/76 (13)
Dose 2 + 1 wk58/76 (76)31/76 (41)
Dose 2 + 2 wk63/72 (88)43/72 (60)
Health care workers2 DosesDose 2 + 2-4 wk35/35 (100)35/35 (100)
Anti-NP
Hemodialysis1 DosePredose 14/66 (5)3/66 (5)
Dose 1 + 4 wk3/66 (5)3/66 (5)
2 DosesPredose 212/76 (16)7/76 (9)
Dose 2 + 1 wk10/76 (13)7/76 (9)
Dose 2 + 2 wk12/72 (17)6/72 (8)
Health care workers2 DosesDose 2 + 2-4 wk3/35 (9)1/35 (3)

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; NP, nucleocapsid protein; RBD, receptor binding domain.

The second dose was administered 21 days following the first dose.

Seroconversion threshold represents a positive test and is 0.19 for anti-spike, 0.186 for anti-RBD, and 0.396 for anti-NP antibodies.

The median level of antigen in convalescent serum is taken 21 to 115 days postsymptom onset is considered a robust antibody response and is 1.38 for anti-spike, 1.25 for anti-RBD, and 1.13 for anti-NP antibodies.

Figure 1.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Response to Spike, Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), and Nucleocapsid Protein (NP) Antigens of SARS-CoV-2 Following 1 vs 2 Doses of BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis

HCW indicates health care worker; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.

Abbreviations: IgG, immunoglobulin G; NP, nucleocapsid protein; RBD, receptor binding domain. The second dose was administered 21 days following the first dose. Seroconversion threshold represents a positive test and is 0.19 for anti-spike, 0.186 for anti-RBD, and 0.396 for anti-NP antibodies. The median level of antigen in convalescent serum is taken 21 to 115 days postsymptom onset is considered a robust antibody response and is 1.38 for anti-spike, 1.25 for anti-RBD, and 1.13 for anti-NP antibodies.

Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Response to Spike, Receptor Binding Domain (RBD), and Nucleocapsid Protein (NP) Antigens of SARS-CoV-2 Following 1 vs 2 Doses of BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis

HCW indicates health care worker; PCR, polymerase chain reaction. The same overall changes were more pronounced for antibodies to RBD, which are well correlated with neutralizing antibodies.[9,11] The first vaccine dose elicited a poor anti-RBD response, with seroconversion in 36 of 66 patients (55%) in the 1-dose group and 31 of 76 (41%) in the 2-dose group. After 1 dose, only 4 patients (6%) in the 1-dose group and 10 patients (13%) in the 2-dose group reached convalescent serum levels. However, 1 week after the second dose of vaccine, 58 of 76 (76%) individuals had seroconverted, with 31 of 76 (41%) having antibody levels above the median of convalescent serum. Two weeks after the second dose of vaccine, 63 of 72 patients (88%) seroconverted and 43 of 72 (60%) were above the convalescent serum level. In HCW controls, 100% reached the convalescent levels for both anti-spike and anti-RBD 2 to 4 weeks after 2 doses, and antibody levels in HCWs were significantly higher than in patients receiving hemodialysis at both 1 and 2 weeks after the second dose (anti-spike: 1 week, 53.0; P < .001; 2 weeks, 124.0; P < .001; anti-RBD: 1 week, 17.0; P < .001; 2 weeks, 32.0; P < .001; with Mann-Whitney test). Results were similar when individuals with baseline anti-NP seroconversion were excluded (eTable 1, eTable 2, and eFigure in the Supplement). The vaccine was generally well tolerated after both the first and second doses (Figure 2). The most common reactions included pain at the injection site, fatigue, and myalgias. The presence of reactogenicity after the second dose was associated with anti-RBD seroconversion (χ2 = 12.42; P < .001)[2] but not anti-spike seroconversion. Similarly, multivariate logistic regression found an association between vaccine reactogenicity and anti-RBD seroconversion (odds ratio, 22.90; 95% CI, 2.46-212.83; P = .01) but not age or sex (Table 3). Two patients contracted COVID-19 following 2 doses of vaccine despite both having an anti-RBD antibody response above convalescent serum levels before anti-NP seroconversion. Both patients were hospitalized but did not experience severe disease.
Figure 2.

Reactogenicity Rates Following BNT162b2 Vaccine by Symptom Severity

Localized and systemic symptoms that occurred after the first (A) and second (B) doses of the vaccine.

Table 3.

Multivariate Logistic Regression of the Association Between Variables and SARS-CoV-2 Immunogobulin G Anti-RBD Seroconversion or Convalescent Serum Levels 2 Weeks After Second BNT162b2 Dose

VariableAnti-RBD seroconversionaAnti-RBD reaching median convalescent serum levelb
OR (95% CI)P valueOR (95% CI)P value
Age1.01 (0.97-1.06).580.98 (0.94-1.01).22
Male sex1.33 (0.25-7.24).740.45 (0.16-1.28).13
Vaccine reactogenicityc22.86 (2.46-212.83).0061.96 (0.70-5.50).20

Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; IgG, immunoglobulin G; RBD, receptor binding domain.

Seroconversion threshold represents a positive test and is 0.186 for anti-RBD.

The median convalescent serum level is taken from COVID-19 survivors 21 to 115 days postsymptom onset and is 1.25 for anti-RBD antibodies.

Vaccine reactogenicity in patients receiving hemodialysis (n = 70) was binary in the model based on the presence of any of the following symptoms within 14 days after the second vaccine dose: pain, redness, swelling, fever, chills, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, and joint pain.

Reactogenicity Rates Following BNT162b2 Vaccine by Symptom Severity

Localized and systemic symptoms that occurred after the first (A) and second (B) doses of the vaccine. Abbreviations: OR, odds ratio; IgG, immunoglobulin G; RBD, receptor binding domain. Seroconversion threshold represents a positive test and is 0.186 for anti-RBD. The median convalescent serum level is taken from COVID-19 survivors 21 to 115 days postsymptom onset and is 1.25 for anti-RBD antibodies. Vaccine reactogenicity in patients receiving hemodialysis (n = 70) was binary in the model based on the presence of any of the following symptoms within 14 days after the second vaccine dose: pain, redness, swelling, fever, chills, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, and joint pain.

Discussion

This prospective serologic study found that, although high rates of seroconversion were observed, consistent with other studies in patients receiving hemodialysis,[12] a robust anti-RBD response defined as reaching convalescent serum levels was seen in less than 10% of patients 28 days after a single vaccine dose. In contrast, 2 weeks after the second dose, 60% of patients receiving hemodialysis had anti-RBD antibody levels comparable with those achieved by patients with COVID-19 infection. Anti-RBD response was lower than anti-spike response, which is of importance because anti-RBD may better associate with viral neutralization.[9] Comparison of antibody levels with convalescent serum standards from patients with previous COVID-19 infection have been useful comparators for vaccine immunogenicity.[10] The rationale for using the median convalescent level is that individuals who are vaccinated should at least be expected to reach the antibody levels obtained by individuals with prior COVID-19. We also found that symptoms following the second vaccine dose were associated with anti-RBD seroconversion and may help identify patients who develop some protection. The response to the second dose, however, was notably weaker than in the HCW controls, all of whom generated robust anti-RBD antibodies. This finding is similar to other high-risk populations. In Canada, patients with cancer and solid organ transplant received 2 doses per manufacturer guidelines because studies demonstrating poor humoral response to 1-dose vaccination led to policy changes.[13,14] With widespread global vaccine shortages, it is necessary to identify these groups.

Limitations

This study has limitations. This was a small, single-center study, limiting our ability to fully assess all factors associated with immune response. Follow-up was limited but is ongoing in a larger patient cohort. In addition, the HCW reference population was younger and primarily female. Although our study did not evaluate cell-mediated immunity directly, a good anti-RBD response is required for adequate cell-mediated response.[15] However, we recognize that longitudinal studies will be required to confirm the clinical significance of comparison with convalescent levels and correlate this outcome with vaccine effectiveness.

Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest a poor humoral response following a single dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. The second dose should not be delayed in this population.
  15 in total

1.  Immunogenicity of a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 Messenger RNA Vaccine in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Brian J Boyarsky; William A Werbel; Robin K Avery; Aaron A R Tobian; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  US Renal Data System 2020 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States.

Authors:  Kirsten L Johansen; Glenn M Chertow; Robert N Foley; David T Gilbertson; Charles A Herzog; Areef Ishani; Ajay K Israni; Elaine Ku; Manjula Kurella Tamura; Shuling Li; Suying Li; Jiannong Liu; Gregorio T Obrador; Ann M O'Hare; Yi Peng; Neil R Powe; Nicholas S Roetker; Wendy L St Peter; Kevin C Abbott; Kevin E Chan; Ivonne H Schulman; Jon Snyder; Craig Solid; Eric D Weinhandl; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; James B Wetmore
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  A serological assay to detect SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in humans.

Authors:  Fatima Amanat; Daniel Stadlbauer; Shirin Strohmeier; Thi H O Nguyen; Veronika Chromikova; Meagan McMahon; Kaijun Jiang; Guha Asthagiri Arunkumar; Denise Jurczyszak; Jose Polanco; Maria Bermudez-Gonzalez; Giulio Kleiner; Teresa Aydillo; Lisa Miorin; Daniel S Fierer; Luz Amarilis Lugo; Erna Milunka Kojic; Jonathan Stoever; Sean T H Liu; Charlotte Cunningham-Rundles; Philip L Felgner; Thomas Moran; Adolfo García-Sastre; Daniel Caplivski; Allen C Cheng; Katherine Kedzierska; Olli Vapalahti; Jussi M Hepojoki; Viviana Simon; Florian Krammer
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Delaying the second dose of covid-19 vaccines.

Authors:  Dominic Pimenta; Christian Yates; Christina Pagel; Deepti Gurdasani
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-18

5.  A Longitudinal, 3-Month Serologic Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 Infections in a Belgian Hemodialysis Facility.

Authors:  Laura Labriola; Anaïs Scohy; François Seghers; Quentin Perlot; Julien De Greef; Christine Desmet; Cécile Romain; Johann Morelle; Jean-Cyr Yombi; Benoît Kabamba; Hector Rodriguez-Villalobos; Michel Jadoul
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 8.237

6.  Neutralizing antibody levels are highly predictive of immune protection from symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors:  David S Khoury; Deborah Cromer; Arnold Reynaldi; Timothy E Schlub; Adam K Wheatley; Jennifer A Juno; Kanta Subbarao; Stephen J Kent; James A Triccas; Miles P Davenport
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 87.241

7.  Discrete SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers track with functional humoral stability.

Authors:  Yannic C Bartsch; Stephanie Fischinger; Sameed M Siddiqui; Zhilin Chen; Jingyou Yu; Makda Gebre; Caroline Atyeo; Matthew J Gorman; Alex Lee Zhu; Jaewon Kang; John S Burke; Matthew Slein; Matthew J Gluck; Samuel Beger; Yiyuan Hu; Justin Rhee; Eric Petersen; Benjamin Mormann; Michael de St Aubin; Mohammad A Hasdianda; Guruprasad Jambaulikar; Edward W Boyer; Pardis C Sabeti; Dan H Barouch; Boris D Julg; Elon R Musk; Anil S Menon; Douglas A Lauffenburger; Eric J Nilles; Galit Alter
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Safety and immunogenicity of one versus two doses of the COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 for patients with cancer: interim analysis of a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Leticia Monin; Adam G Laing; Miguel Muñoz-Ruiz; Duncan R McKenzie; Irene Del Molino Del Barrio; Thanussuyah Alaguthurai; Clara Domingo-Vila; Thomas S Hayday; Carl Graham; Jeffrey Seow; Sultan Abdul-Jawad; Shraddha Kamdar; Elizabeth Harvey-Jones; Rosalind Graham; Jack Cooper; Muhammad Khan; Jennifer Vidler; Helen Kakkassery; Shubhankar Sinha; Richard Davis; Liane Dupont; Isaac Francos Quijorna; Charlotte O'Brien-Gore; Puay Ling Lee; Josephine Eum; Maria Conde Poole; Magdalene Joseph; Daniel Davies; Yin Wu; Angela Swampillai; Bernard V North; Ana Montes; Mark Harries; Anne Rigg; James Spicer; Michael H Malim; Paul Fields; Piers Patten; Francesca Di Rosa; Sophie Papa; Timothy Tree; Katie J Doores; Adrian C Hayday; Sheeba Irshad
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  COVID-19 in patients undergoing long-term dialysis in Ontario.

Authors:  Leena Taji; Doneal Thomas; Matthew J Oliver; Jane Ip; Yiwen Tang; Angie Yeung; Rebecca Cooper; Andrew A House; Phil McFarlane; Peter G Blake
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  A simple protein-based surrogate neutralization assay for SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Kento T Abe; Zhijie Li; Reuben Samson; Payman Samavarchi-Tehrani; Emelissa J Valcourt; Heidi Wood; Patrick Budylowski; Alan P Dupuis; Roxie C Girardin; Bhavisha Rathod; Jenny H Wang; Miriam Barrios-Rodiles; Karen Colwill; Allison J McGeer; Samira Mubareka; Jennifer L Gommerman; Yves Durocher; Mario Ostrowski; Kathleen A McDonough; Michael A Drebot; Steven J Drews; James M Rini; Anne-Claude Gingras
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-10-02
View more
  23 in total

1.  Clinical Utility of COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Peter G Blake
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-06       Impact factor: 10.614

2. 

Authors:  Kevin Yau; Christopher T Chan; Kento T Abe; Yidi Jiang; Mohammad Atiquzzaman; Sarah I Mullin; Ellen Shadowitz; Lisa Liu; Ema Kostadinovic; Tatjana Sukovic; Anny Gonzalez; Margaret E McGrath-Chong; Matthew J Oliver; Jeffrey Perl; Jerome A Leis; Shelly Bolotin; Vanessa Tran; Adeera Levin; Peter G Blake; Karen Colwill; Anne-Claude Gingras; Michelle A Hladunewich
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 16.859

3.  A Qualitative Comparison of the Abbott SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant Assay against Commonly Used Canadian SARS-CoV-2 Enzyme Immunoassays in Blood Donor Retention Specimens, April 2020 to March 2021.

Authors:  Kento T Abe; Bhavisha Rathod; Karen Colwill; Anne-Claude Gingras; Ashleigh Tuite; Ninette F Robbins; Guillermo Orjuela; Craig Jenkins; Valerie Conrod; Qi-Long Yi; Sheila F O'Brien; Steven J Drews
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2022-06-02

4.  Vaccine Effectiveness Against SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Severe Outcomes in the Maintenance Dialysis Population in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  Matthew J Oliver; Doneal Thomas; Shabnam Balamchi; Jane Ip; Kyla Naylor; Stephanie N Dixon; Eric McArthur; Jeff Kwong; Jeffrey Perl; Mohammad Atiquzzaman; Joel Singer; Angie Yeung; Michelle Hladunewich; Kevin Yau; Amit X Garg; Jerome A Leis; Adeera Levin; Mel Krajden; Peter G Blake
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 14.978

5.  Does a humoral correlate of protection exist for SARS-CoV-2? A systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Perry; Selma Osman; James Wright; Melissa Richard-Greenblatt; Sarah A Buchan; Manish Sadarangani; Shelly Bolotin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antibody Response and Safety After mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients - the Vienna Cohort.

Authors:  Georg Beilhack; Rossella Monteforte; Florian Frommlet; Martina Gaggl; Robert Strassl; Andreas Vychytil
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 7.  A Systematic Review on COVID-19 Vaccine Strategies, Their Effectiveness, and Issues.

Authors:  Shahad Saif Khandker; Brian Godman; Md Irfan Jawad; Bushra Ayat Meghla; Taslima Akter Tisha; Mohib Ullah Khondoker; Md Ahsanul Haq; Jaykaran Charan; Ali Azam Talukder; Nafisa Azmuda; Shahana Sharmin; Mohd Raeed Jamiruddin; Mainul Haque; Nihad Adnan
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-24

8.  Decline of Humoral Responses 6 Months after Vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) in Patients on Hemodialysis.

Authors:  Michael Jahn; Johannes Korth; Oliver Dorsch; Olympia Evdoxia Anastasiou; Adalbert Krawczyk; Leonie Brochhagen; Lukas van de Sand; Burkhard Sorge-Hädicke; Bartosz Tyczynski; Oliver Witzke; Ulf Dittmer; Sebastian Dolff; Benjamin Wilde; Andreas Kribben
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-18

9.  Review of Early Immune Response to SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Among Patients With CKD.

Authors:  Edward J Carr; Andreas Kronbichler; Matthew Graham-Brown; Graham Abra; Christos Argyropoulos; Lorraine Harper; Edgar V Lerma; Rita S Suri; Joel Topf; Michelle Willicombe; Swapnil Hiremath
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-07-06

10.  SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Western Romania, March to June 2021.

Authors:  Tudor Rares Olariu; Alina Cristiana Craciun; Daliborca Cristina Vlad; Victor Dumitrascu; Iosif Marincu; Maria Alina Lupu
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-26       Impact factor: 2.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.