Na Liu1, Jiamin Yin2, Sharon Swee-Lin Tan2, Kee Yuan Ngiam3, Hock Hai Teo2. 1. Discipline of Business Information Systems, The University of Sydney Business School, Sydney, Australia. 2. Department of Information Systems and Analytics, School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. 3. Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Mobile-based interventions have the potential to promote healthy aging among older adults. However, the adoption and use of mobile health applications are often low due to inappropriate designs. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, synthesize, and report interface and persuasive feature design recommendations of mobile health applications for elderly users to facilitate adoption and improve health-related outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus databases to identify studies that discussed and evaluated elderly-friendly interface and persuasive feature designs of mobile health applications using an elderly cohort. RESULTS: We included 74 studies in our analysis. Our analysis revealed a total of 9 elderly-friendly interface design recommendations: 3 recommendations were targeted at perceptual capabilities of elderly users, 2 at motor coordination problems, and 4 at cognitive and memory deterioration. We also compiled and reported 5 categories of persuasive features: reminders, social features, game elements, personalized interventions, and health education. DISCUSSION: Only 5 studies included design elements that were based on theories. Moreover, the majority of the included studies evaluated the application as a whole without examining end-user perceptions and the effectiveness of each single design feature. Finally, most studies had methodological limitations, and better research designs are needed to quantify the effectiveness of the application designs rigorously. CONCLUSIONS: This review synthesizes elderly-friendly interface and persuasive feature design recommendations for mobile health applications from the existing literature and provides recommendations for future research in this area and guidelines for designers.
OBJECTIVE: Mobile-based interventions have the potential to promote healthy aging among older adults. However, the adoption and use of mobile health applications are often low due to inappropriate designs. The aim of this systematic review is to identify, synthesize, and report interface and persuasive feature design recommendations of mobile health applications for elderly users to facilitate adoption and improve health-related outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus databases to identify studies that discussed and evaluated elderly-friendly interface and persuasive feature designs of mobile health applications using an elderly cohort. RESULTS: We included 74 studies in our analysis. Our analysis revealed a total of 9 elderly-friendly interface design recommendations: 3 recommendations were targeted at perceptual capabilities of elderly users, 2 at motor coordination problems, and 4 at cognitive and memory deterioration. We also compiled and reported 5 categories of persuasive features: reminders, social features, game elements, personalized interventions, and health education. DISCUSSION: Only 5 studies included design elements that were based on theories. Moreover, the majority of the included studies evaluated the application as a whole without examining end-user perceptions and the effectiveness of each single design feature. Finally, most studies had methodological limitations, and better research designs are needed to quantify the effectiveness of the application designs rigorously. CONCLUSIONS: This review synthesizes elderly-friendly interface and persuasive feature design recommendations for mobile health applications from the existing literature and provides recommendations for future research in this area and guidelines for designers.
Authors: João Balsa; Isa Félix; Ana Paula Cláudio; Maria Beatriz Carmo; Isabel Costa E Silva; Ana Guerreiro; Maria Guedes; Adriana Henriques; Mara Pereira Guerreiro Journal: J Med Syst Date: 2020-06-13 Impact factor: 4.460
Authors: Eva van Het Reve; Patrícia Silveira; Florian Daniel; Fabio Casati; Eling D de Bruin Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Kah Poh Loh; Erika Ramsdale; Eva Culakova; Jason H Mendler; Jane L Liesveld; Kristen M O'Dwyer; Colin McHugh; Maxence Gilles; Terri Lloyd; Molly Goodman; Heidi D Klepin; Karen M Mustian; Rebecca Schnall; Supriya G Mohile Journal: JMIR Cancer Date: 2018-10-29