Literature DB >> 34471960

Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, potential for CYP3A inhibition, and food effect in patients with cancer and healthy subjects receiving ipatasertib.

Vikram Malhi1, Nageshwar Budha2, Rucha Sane3, Jian Huang4, Bianca Liederer5, Raymond Meng6, Premal Patel7, Yuzhong Deng4, Andres Cervantes8, Josep Tabernero9, Luna Musib3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics (PK), CYP3A inhibition potential of ipatasertib, and effect of food on PK of ipatasertib in patients with refractory solid tumors and a dedicated food effect assessment in healthy subjects.
METHODS: The Phase I dose-escalation study enrolled patients with solid tumors in a standard 3 + 3 design with a 1 week washout after the first dose, followed by once-daily dosing on a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule. In the expansion cohort, the effect of ipatasertib on CYP3A substrate (midazolam) was assessed by examining the change in midazolam exposure when dosed in the absence and presence of steady-state ipatasertib at 600 mg. The effect of food on ipatasertib PK was studied with ipatasertib administered in fed or fasted state (6 patients from Phase I patient study and 18 healthy subjects from the dedicated food effect study).
RESULTS: Ipatasertib was generally well tolerated at doses up to 600 mg given daily for 21 days. Ipatasertib showed rapid absorption (tmax, 0.5-3 h), was dose-proportional over a range of 200-800 mg, had a median half-life (range) of 45.0 h (27.8-66.9 h), and had approximately two-fold accumulation following once-daily dosing. Midazolam exposure (AUC0-∞) increased by 2.2-fold in the presence of ipatasertib. PK was comparable in subjects administered ipatasertib in a fed or fasted state.
CONCLUSION: Ipatasertib exhibited rapid absorption and was dose-proportional over a broad dose range. Ipatasertib appeared to be a moderate CYP3A inhibitor when administered at 600 mg and could be administered with or without food in clinical studies. TRAIL REGISTRATION: NCT01090960 (registered March 23, 2010); NCT02536391 (registered August 31, 2015).
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CYP3A; Clinical; Drug-drug interaction; Food effect; Ipatasertib; Midazolam; Pharmacokinetics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34471960     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04344-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  11 in total

1.  Ipatasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (LOTUS): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Sung-Bae Kim; Rebecca Dent; Seock-Ah Im; Marc Espié; Sibel Blau; Antoinette R Tan; Steven J Isakoff; Mafalda Oliveira; Cristina Saura; Matthew J Wongchenko; Amy V Kapp; Wai Y Chan; Stina M Singel; Daniel J Maslyar; José Baselga
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 2.  The Akt/PKB pathway: molecular target for cancer drug discovery.

Authors:  Jin Q Cheng; Craig W Lindsley; George Z Cheng; Hua Yang; Santo V Nicosia
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 9.867

3.  Discovery and preclinical pharmacology of a selective ATP-competitive Akt inhibitor (GDC-0068) for the treatment of human tumors.

Authors:  James F Blake; Rui Xu; Josef R Bencsik; Dengming Xiao; Nicholas C Kallan; Stephen Schlachter; Ian S Mitchell; Keith L Spencer; Anna L Banka; Eli M Wallace; Susan L Gloor; Matthew Martinson; Richard D Woessner; Guy P A Vigers; Barbara J Brandhuber; Jun Liang; Brian S Safina; Jun Li; Birong Zhang; Christine Chabot; Steven Do; Leslie Lee; Jason Oeh; Deepak Sampath; Brian B Lee; Kui Lin; Bianca M Liederer; Nicholas J Skelton
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 7.446

Review 4.  The Akt-mTOR tango and its relevance to cancer.

Authors:  Nissim Hay
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Akt Blockade with Ipatasertib, in Combination with Abiraterone, in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer with and without PTEN Loss.

Authors:  Johann S de Bono; Ugo De Giorgi; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Christophe Massard; Sergio Bracarda; Albert Font; Jose Angel Arranz Arija; Kent C Shih; George Daniel Radavoi; Na Xu; Wai Y Chan; Han Ma; Steven Gendreau; Ruth Riisnaes; Premal H Patel; Daniel J Maslyar; Viorel Jinga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  Deregulation of the Akt pathway in human cancer.

Authors:  Eriko Tokunaga; Eiji Oki; Akinori Egashira; Noriaki Sadanaga; Masaru Morita; Yoshihiro Kakeji; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Curr Cancer Drug Targets       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.428

7.  Targeting activated Akt with GDC-0068, a novel selective Akt inhibitor that is efficacious in multiple tumor models.

Authors:  Jie Lin; Deepak Sampath; Michelle A Nannini; Brian B Lee; Michael Degtyarev; Jason Oeh; Heidi Savage; Zhengyu Guan; Rebecca Hong; Robert Kassees; Leslie B Lee; Tyler Risom; Stefan Gross; Bianca M Liederer; Hartmut Koeppen; Nicholas J Skelton; Jeffrey J Wallin; Marcia Belvin; Elizabeth Punnoose; Lori S Friedman; Kui Lin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Is Akt the "Warburg kinase"?-Akt-energy metabolism interactions and oncogenesis.

Authors:  R Brooks Robey; Nissim Hay
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2008-12-14       Impact factor: 15.707

9.  Evaluation and clinical analyses of downstream targets of the Akt inhibitor GDC-0068.

Authors:  Yibing Yan; Violeta Serra; Ludmila Prudkin; Maurizio Scaltriti; Sumati Murli; Olga Rodríguez; Marta Guzman; Deepak Sampath; Michelle Nannini; Yuanyuan Xiao; Marie-Claire Wagle; Jenny Q Wu; Matthew Wongchenko; Garret Hampton; Vanitha Ramakrishnan; Mark R Lackner; Cristina Saura; Desamparados Roda; Andrés Cervantes; Josep Tabernero; Premal Patel; José Baselga
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 10.  AKT/PKB signaling: navigating downstream.

Authors:  Brendan D Manning; Lewis C Cantley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated drug-drug interactions for ipatasertib using a fit-for-purpose physiologically based pharmacokinetic model.

Authors:  Jing Jing; Yuan Chen; Luna Musib; Jin Y Jin; Kit Wun Kathy Cheung; Kenta Yoshida; Rucha Sane
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.288

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.