| Literature DB >> 34471310 |
Ernest Bonah1,2, Xingyi Huang1, Yang Hongying1, Joshua Harrington Aheto1, Ren Yi1,3, Shanshan Yu1, Hongyang Tu1.
Abstract
Rapid detection and quantification of bacterial foodborne pathogens are crucial in reducing the incidence of diseases associated with meat products contaminated with pathogens. For the identification, discrimination and quantification of Salmonella Typhimurium contamination in pork samples, a commercial electronic nose with ten (10) metal oxide semiconductor sensor array is applied. Principal component analysis was successfully applied for discrimination of inoculated samples and inoculated samples at different contaminant levels. Support vector machine regression (SVMR) together with a metaheuristic framework using genetic algorithm (GA), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and grid searching (GS) optimization algorithms were applied for S. Typhimurium quantification. Although SVMR results were satisfactory, SVMR hyperparameter tuning (c and g) by PSO, GA and GS showed superior performance of the models. The order of the prediction accuracy based on the prediction set was GA-SVMR (R P 2 = 0.989; RMSEP = 0.137; RPD = 14.93) > PSO-SVMR (R P 2 = 0.986; RMSEP = 0.145; RPD = 14.11) > GS-SVMR (R P 2 = 0.966; RMSEP = 0.148; RPD = 13.82) > SVMR (R P 2 = 0.949; RMSEP = 0.162; RPD = 12.63). GA-SVMR's proposed approach was fairly more effective and retained an excellent prediction accuracy. A clear relationship was identified between odor analysis results, and reference traditional microbial test, indicating that the electronic nose is useful for accurate microbial volatile organic compound evaluation in the quantification of S. Typhimurium in a food matrix. © Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2020.Entities:
Keywords: Chemometric algorithms; Electronic nose; Foodborne pathogens; Longissimus pork muscle; Metaheuristic algorithms; Salmonella
Year: 2020 PMID: 34471310 PMCID: PMC8357911 DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04847-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Food Sci Technol ISSN: 0022-1155 Impact factor: 3.117