Literature DB >> 34471231

Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT as a predictor of biochemical persistence and early recurrence following radical prostatectomy with lymph node dissection.

D J H Baas1,2, M Schilham3,4, R Hermsen5, J M S de Baaij6,3, H J E J Vrijhof3,7, R J Hoekstra6,3,7, J P M Sedelaar3,8, H V N Küsters-Vandevelde9, M Gotthardt4, C H W Wijers10, J P van Basten6,3, D M Somford6,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of lymph nodes (LN) suspicious for metastases on preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT for biochemical persistence (BCP) and early biochemical recurrence (BCR) following robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with extended pelvic LN dissection (ePLND).
METHODS: We evaluated 213 patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent clinical staging with preoperative 68Ga- or 18F-PSMA-PET/CT scan and subsequent RARP with ePLND. Patients were grouped as PSMA- or PSMA+ depending on their LN status on PSMA-PET/CT and subdivided according to histological LN status in pN0 or pN1. Diagnostic accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT for the detection of pN1 was evaluated. BCP was defined as a first postoperative serum PSA level ≥0.1 ng/mL 6-12 weeks following RP. Early BCR was defined as detectable PSA > 0.2 ng/mL within 12 months of follow-up. Univariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the effect of PSMA+ on BCP and BCR.
RESULTS: Forty patients (19%) were PSMA+. The overall incidence of pN1 was 23%. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV on a per patient level for the detection of pN1 was 29%, 84%, 35%, and 80% respectively. BCP was observed in 26 of 211 patients (12%) and early BCR in 23 of 110 patients (21%). The presence of PSMA+ was a significant predictor for BCP (OR 7.1, 2.9-17.1 95% CI) and BCR (OR 8.1, 2.9-22.6 95% CI).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative PSMA-PET/CT may be a valuable tool for patient counseling for RARP and ePLND as it is a significant predictor for the risk of postoperative BCP and early BCR. We conclude that an ePLND should not be avoided in men with intermediate or high-risk PCa and preoperative negative PSMA-PET/CT, as 20% have microscopic LN metastasis.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34471231     DOI: 10.1038/s41391-021-00452-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis        ISSN: 1365-7852            Impact factor:   5.554


  4 in total

1.  Outcomes of Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer with 68Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography Compared to Histological Correlation of Pelvic Lymph Node Pathology.

Authors:  John W Yaxley; Sheliyan Raveenthiran; François-Xavier Nouhaud; Hemamali Samartunga; Anna J Yaxley; Geoff Coughlin; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; Louise McEwan; David Wong
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Ultrasensitive detection of prostate specific antigen in the followup of 422 patients after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Haese; E Huland; M Graefen; P Hammerer; J Noldus; H Huland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Initial Experience of (68)Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging in High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Prior to Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Georg Salomon; Uwe Michl; Hans Heinzer; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Thomas Steuber; Clemens Rosenbaum
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 20.096

4.  Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pim J van Leeuwen; Louise Emmett; Bao Ho; Warick Delprado; Francis Ting; Quoc Nguyen; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 5.588

  4 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Prebiopsy 68Ga-PSMA PET imaging: can we improve the current diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Simone Albisinni; Julien Sarkis; Romain Diamand; Cosimo De Nunzio
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 5.455

2.  Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen PET: Standard Imaging in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 29.146

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.