Literature DB >> 34469764

Clinical outcomes in systematic screening for atrial fibrillation (STROKESTOP): a multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial.

Emma Svennberg1, Leif Friberg2, Viveka Frykman2, Faris Al-Khalili2, Johan Engdahl2, Mårten Rosenqvist2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation is a leading cause of ischaemic stroke. Early detection of atrial fibrillation can enable anticoagulant therapy to reduce ischaemic stroke and mortality. In this randomised study in an older population, we aimed to assess whether systematic screening for atrial fibrillation could reduce mortality and morbidity compared with no screening.
METHODS: STROKESTOP was a multicentre, parallel group, unmasked, randomised controlled trial done in Halland and Stockholm in Sweden. All 75-76-year-olds residing in these two regions were randomly assigned (1:1) to be invited to screening for atrial fibrillation or to a control group. Participants attended local screening centres and those without a history of atrial fibrillation were asked to register intermittent electrocardiograms (ECGs) for 14 days. Treatment with oral anticoagulants was offered if atrial fibrillation was detected or untreated. All randomly assigned individuals were followed up in the intention-to-treat analysis for a minimum of 5 years for the primary combined endpoint of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, systemic embolism, bleeding leading to hospitalisation, and all-cause death. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01593553.
FINDINGS: From March 1, 2012, to May 28, 2014, 28 768 individuals were assessed for eligibility and randomly assigned to be invited to screening (n=14 387) or the control group (n=14 381). 408 individuals were excluded from the intervention group and 385 were excluded from the control group due to death or migration before invitation. There was no loss to follow-up. Of those invited to screening, 7165 (51·3%) of 13 979 participated. After a median follow-up of 6·9 years (IQR 6·5-7·2), significantly fewer primary endpoint events occurred in the intervention group (4456 [31·9%] of 13 979; 5·45 events per 100 years [95% CI 5·52-5·61]) than in the control group (4616 [33·0%] of 13 996; 5·68 events per 100 years [5·52-5·85]; hazard ratio 0·96 [95% CI 0·92-1·00]; p=0·045).
INTERPRETATION: Screening for atrial fibrillation showed a small net benefit compared with standard of care, indicating that screening is safe and beneficial in older populations. FUNDING: Stockholm County Council, the Swedish Heart & Lung Foundation, King Gustav V and Queen Victoria's Freemasons' Foundation, the Klebergska Foundation, the Tornspiran Foundation, the Scientific Council of Halland Region, the Southern Regional Healthcare Committee, the Swedish Stroke Fund, Carl Bennet AB, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Bristol Myers Squibb-Pfizer.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34469764     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01637-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  24 in total

1.  Screening strategies for AF.

Authors:  Gregory B Lim
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Screening for Atrial Fibrillation in Older Adults at Primary Care Visits: VITAL-AF Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Steven A Lubitz; Steven J Atlas; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Ana T Trisini Lipsanopoulos; Leila H Borowsky; Wyliena Guan; Shaan Khurshid; Patrick T Ellinor; Yuchiao Chang; David D McManus; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Use of digital health applications for the detection of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Dennis Lawin; Sebastian Kuhn; Sophia Schulze Lammers; Thorsten Lawrenz; Christoph Stellbrink
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-08-12

Review 4.  Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Xu Gao; Rod Passman
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.955

5.  Screening for atrial fibrillation: less is more?

Authors:  Emma Svennberg; Frieder Braunschweig
Journal:  Eur Heart J Open       Date:  2021-12-31

Review 6.  Management of atrial fibrillation: two decades of progress - a scientific statement from the European Cardiac Arrhythmia Society.

Authors:  Samuel Lévy; Gerhard Steinbeck; Luca Santini; Michael Nabauer; Diego Penela Maceda; Bharat K Kantharia; Sanjeev Saksena; Riccardo Cappato
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 1.759

7.  What is next for screening for undiagnosed atrial fibrillation? Artificial intelligence may hold the key.

Authors:  Ramesh Nadarajah; Jianhua Wu; Alejandro F Frangi; David Hogg; Campbell Cowan; Chris P Gale
Journal:  Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  Atrial fibrillation detected at screening is not a benign condition: outcomes in screen-detected versus clinically detected atrial fibrillation. Results from the Prevention of Renal and Vascular End-stage Disease (PREVEND) study.

Authors:  Victor W Zwartkruis; Bastiaan Geelhoed; Navin Suthahar; Stephan J L Bakker; Ron T Gansevoort; Isabelle C van Gelder; Rudolf A de Boer; Michiel Rienstra
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2021-12

9.  Point-of-care screening for atrial fibrillation: Where are we, and where do we go next?

Authors:  Jeffrey M Ashburner; Shaan Khurshid; Steven J Atlas; Daniel E Singer; Steven A Lubitz
Journal:  Cardiovasc Digit Health J       Date:  2021-10-08

Review 10.  Remote Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in the Era of Smart Wearables: Present Assets and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Anastasia Xintarakou; Vasileios Sousonis; Dimitrios Asvestas; Panos E Vardas; Stylianos Tzeis
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.