| Literature DB >> 34468834 |
Somar M Hasan1, Martin Hammer2, Daniel Meller2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the effect of anti-VEGF therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME) on retinal oxygen saturation (O2S) and its correlation with functional and anatomical changes of retinal tissue.Entities:
Keywords: Aflibercept; Anti-VEGF therapy; Diabetic macular edema; Diabetic retinopathy; Retinal oxygen saturation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34468834 PMCID: PMC8786788 DOI: 10.1007/s00417-021-05319-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol ISSN: 0721-832X Impact factor: 3.117
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
| Inclusion criteria | Patients with non-treated diabetic macular edema |
| Able to sign a written informed consent | |
| Age between 21 and 80 years | |
| Able to complete the study protocol | |
| Best corrected visual acuity between 20/400 and 20/25 in the study eye | |
| Manufacturer’s criteria for aflibercept treatment | |
| Exclusion criteria | Proliferative DR or non-proliferative DR requiring or expected to need laser photocoagulation during the study period. |
| Any previous ocular surgical intervention other than non-complicated cataract surgery (this should have been performed 8 weeks before inclusion) | |
| Any retinal pathology other than DR (vascular occlusion, hereditary retinal dystrophies, vitreomacular traction, etc.) | |
| Any macular pathology other than DME (any form or stage of macular degeneration, macular hole, macular edema of other reason than DME .. etc.) | |
| Spherical equivalent of more than +6.0 Diopters or less than −3.0 Diopters | |
| Systemic diseases which might affect retinal O2S (COPD, renal insufficiency, etc.) | |
| Hypertension with hypertensive retinopathy ≥ II° | |
| History of stroke, transient ischemic attack or myocardial infarction | |
| Status post intravitreal injections | |
| Media opacities affecting fundus examination | |
| Any acute infection of the eye | |
| Advanced glaucoma with a cup to disk excavation ≥0.8 | |
| Pregnancy or lactation |
Abbreviations: DR diabetic retinopathy
Study protocol
| V 0 | V 1 | V 2 | V 3 | V 4 | V 5 | V 6 | V 7 | V 8 | V 9 | V 10 | V 11 | V 12 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVIA | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |||||
| Visus | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| IOP | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| Slitlamp | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| O2S | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | |
| OCT | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
Abbreviations: IVIA intravitreal injection of aflibercept, IOP intraocular pressure, OS retinal oxygen saturation, OCT optical coherence tomography
Preoperative data of all 10 eyes of 10 patients
| Patient | Sex | Age | Loc | IOP | Stage | CRT | BCVA | aO2S | vO2S | AVdO2S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | 62 | L | 16 | Moderate | 320 | 79 | 100.91 | 65.284 | 35.626 |
| 2 | M | 66 | R | 20 | Mild | 343 | 72 | 100.566 | 63.614 | 36.952 |
| 3 | F | 81 | L | 17 | Mild | 463 | 56 | 92.982 | 45.404 | 47.578 |
| 4 | F | 65 | L | 22 | Severe | 498 | 54 | 100.696 | 70.162 | 30.534 |
| 5 | M | 77 | L | 14 | Moderate | 270 | 55 | 108.922 | 69.094 | 39.828 |
| 6 | M | 41 | R | 21 | Mild | 384 | 75 | 96.342 | 55.971 | 40.371 |
| 7 | F | 60 | R | 18 | Mild | 390 | 65 | 95.602 | 58.666 | 36.936 |
| 8 | M | 60 | R | 14 | Severe | 494 | 75 | 112.638 | 58.422 | 54.216 |
| 9 | M | 72 | L | 13 | Severe | 395 | 60 | 111.628 | 79.354 | 32.274 |
| 10 | M | 50 | L | 16 | Moderate | 383 | 51 | 109.621 | 55.983 | 53.638 |
| Mean ± STD | 63.4 ± 11.9 | 17.1 ±3.1 | N/A | 394 ± 73.99 | 64.2 ± 10.3 | 102.99 ± 7.15 | 62.19 ± 9.44 | 40.79 ± 8.34 |
Abbreviations: LOC localization, L left, R right, IOP intraocular pressure in mmHg, Stage stage of diabetic retinopathy, CRT central retinal thickness in μm, BCVA best corrected visual acuity in ETDRS letters, aOS arterial retinal oxygen saturation, vOS venous retinal oxygen saturation, AVdOS arteriovenous difference of retinal oxygen saturation
Outcomes over 11 visits (mean ± standard deviation, p values are calculated for every visit compared to V0)
| Patient | V0 | V2 | V3 | V4 | V5 | V6 | V7 | V8 | V9 | V10 | V11 | V12 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BCVA | 64.2 ± 10.3 | 69.2 ± 9.0 | 68.8 ± 7.94 | 69.5 ± 9.16 | 68.8 ± 10.38 | 69.8 ± 10.22 | 69.5 ± 9.70 | 69.6 ± 8.99 | 69.2 ± 9.37 | 69.7 ± 9.74 | 70.5 ± 9.25 | 71 ± 9.35 |
| CRT | 394 ± 73.98 ( | 316.4 ± 62.05 ( | 306.4 ± 66.0 ( | 301.5 ± 71.75 ( | 302.7 ± 69.39 ( | 308 ± 73.71 ( | 299.2 ± 67.08 ( | 296.9 ± 62.99 ( | 295 ± 75.65 ( | 293.5 ± 67.26 ( | 295.1 ± 64.08 ( | 290.1 ± 64.67 ( |
| IOP | 17.1 ± 3.1 | 15.2 ± 3.0 | 15.7 ± 3.5 | 15.94 ± 2.7 | 16.5 ± 3.3 | 17.17 ± 2.0 | 16.7 ± 2.7 | 16.4 ± 2.4 | 17.8 ± 2.5 | 16.8 ± 1.3 | 17.4±.1.3 | 17.6 ± 2.9 |
| aO2S | 103.0 ± 7.1 | 102.2 ± 8.3 ( | 104.8 ± 7.4 ( | 103.8 ± 8.4 ( | 103.5 ± 8.2 ( | 102.0 ± 7.3 ( | 102.0 ± 8.1 ( | 101.2 ± 7.0 ( | 100.2 ± 8.5 ( | 100.9 ± 8.5 ( | 101.3 ± 7.4 ( | 101.2 ± 7.6 ( |
| vO2S | 62.2 ± 9.4 | 62.0 ± 11.1 ( | 64.6 ± 9.6 ( | 60.4 ± 9.8 ( | 62.9 ± 11.2 ( | 57.2 ± 10.5 ( | 62.9 ± 9.7 ( | 58.1 ± 10.5 ( | 58.1 ± 11.0 ( | 59.3 ± 10.8 ( | 59.6 ± 11.3 ( | 59.4 ± 13.2 ( |
| AVDO2S | 40.8 ± 8.3 | 41.1 ± 8.4 ( | 40.2 ± 9.6 ( | 44.7 ± 11.4 ( | 40.6 ± 11.2 ( | 44.8 ± 10.6 ( | 41.1 ± 10.6 ( | 43.0 ± 10.8 ( | 39.1 ± 9.1 ( | 41.7 ± 9.5 ( | 38.8 ± 9.0 ( | 41.8 ± 11.3 ( |
Abbreviations: V visit, BCVA best corrected visual acuity in ETDRS letters, CRT central retinal thickness in μm, IOP intraocular pressure in mmHg
Fig. 1Progression of retinal oxygen saturation on visit 0, visit 6, and visit 12. Graphic generated using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). The * sign points to statistically significant difference