Literature DB >> 34467472

Thiol level and total oxidant/antioxidant status in patients with COVID-19 infection.

Gökhan Çakırca1, Tuba Damar Çakırca2, Murat Üstünel3, Ayşe Torun2, İsmail Koyuncu4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence suggests that oxidative stress is closely related to the pathogenesis and severity of COVID-19 infection. Here, we attempted to compare thiol, total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), and oxidative stress index (OSI) levels between COVID-19 patients who need and do not need intensive care unit (ICU) support, and determine whether these markers could be used as predictors of ICU admission.
METHODS: We recruited 86 patients with COVID-19 infection and classified them into two groups according to the level of care: ICU group (n = 40) and non-ICU group (n = 46). Thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI levels were determined and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The levels of thiol and TAS in serum were markedly lower in ICU patients than in the non-ICU patients. On the contrary, TOS and OSI levels were markedly higher. Inflammatory markers, including white blood cell, neutrophil, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and ferritin, were negatively correlated with the thiol and TAS, and positively correlated with the TOS and OSI. We determined that areas under the ROC curve for thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI were 0.799, 0.778, 0.713, and 0.780, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results revealed that the increase in oxidative stress and decrease in antioxidant levels in COVID-19-infected patients were associated with worsening of disease. Thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI parameters can be used to distinguish between ICU patients and those who do not, among which thiol was the best predictor of ICU requirement.
© 2021. Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Intensive care unit; Oxidative stress index; Thiol

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34467472      PMCID: PMC8407933          DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02743-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ir J Med Sci        ISSN: 0021-1265            Impact factor:   2.089


Introduction

The new corona virus 2019 (COVID-19) infection, which can cause life-threatening consequences and even deaths, was first seen in Wuhan, China, in late 2019 [1]. Accumulating evidence suggests that elevated inflammation levels, increased oxidative stress, and dysregulation of immune response may contribute to the pathogenesis and consequences of COVID-19 infection. These factors trigger an excessive pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion, namely cytokine storm, and thus can cause severe complications such as acute lung damage, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), shock, and even death [2-4]. Previous studies have reported that oxidative stress caused by excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and/or reduction in antioxidant defense system plays a crucial role in viral replication and the occurrence of virus-related diseases [5-7]. Antioxidant defense systems such as thiol or sulphydryl (–SH) in the organism play a protective role in cells and tissues against the harmful effects of ROS [8]. Thiols exhibit antioxidant properties via different mechanisms such as component of thiol-disulfide redox buffer, radical quenchers and chelators of metal ions [9]. Thiol groups are quickly and easily converted to reversible disulfide bonds through thiol-disulfide exchange reactions in ROS exposure. This double-sided cycle is crucially involved in various biological processes (e.g., signal transduction, apoptosis, protein conformation, immune response, cell growth and death) as well as antioxidant systems [10-12]. In recent studies, it has been reported that the thiol parameter can be used as a marker in the diagnosis and prediction of the severity of COVID-19 infection [13, 14]. There are many antioxidant and oxidant molecules that reflect the oxidative stress state in the organism, but measuring their levels separately is both difficult and costly. Therefore, practically total oxidant status (TOS) and total antioxidant status (TAS) are measured [15, 16] and the oxidative stress index (OSI), which reflects the degree of oxidative stress, is calculated by proportioning TOS to TAS [17]. Studies focusing on the direct role of oxidative stress and its biomarkers in COVID-19-infected patients are limited in the literature. Therefore, we compared thiol, TOS, TAS, and OSI levels between COVID-19 patients with and without intensive care unit (ICU) requirement and investigated their predictive values for ICU admission.

Materials and methods

This prospective, single-center study contained 86 adult COVID-19-infected patients (≥ 18 years old) admitted to the Sanliurfa Training and Research Hospital between March and May 2021. This study was confirmed by the Ethics Committee of Harran University (Protocol number: HRU/21.07.13). The results of the RT-PCR tests performed to determine the presence of novel coronavirus in all patients were positive. The 86 patients with COVID-19 included in the study were divided into two groups according to level of care: ICU group (n = 40) and non-ICU group (n = 46). COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU met one of the following criteria in accordance with Chinese clinical guidelines [18]: (I) respiratory failure and needing mechanical ventilation; (II) shock; (III) other organ failure that needs ICU support. Patients who had a chronic kidney failure, chronic hepatic disease, endocrinological disease (excluding diabetes), cerebrovascular disease, malignancy, hematological disorder, and rheumatic disease, and who were pregnant were not included in our study. In addition, none of the patients was using cigarette, alcohol, antioxidant, or vitamin supplements. Demographic information, including age and gender, and coexisting conditions (diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, dyslipidemia, and respiratory system disease) and the results of routine blood tests (complete blood count, albumin, urea, creatinine, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), uric acid, C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, ferritin and fibrinogen) at admission to the hospital of each patient were extracted from the hospital database. For detecting the levels of serum thiol, TAS, and TOS parameters, peripheral blood samples were obtained from participants on the first day of admission to the hospital after diagnosis of COVID-19 infection. Serum samples were obtained by centrifugation (1500 × g, 10 min) of the collected blood samples and then kept at 80 °C until analysis of the thiol, TAS, and TOS parameters. White blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, lymphocyte, hemoglobin, and platelet counts were determined with the Sysmex XN-1000 analyzer (Sysmex, Japan). Serum albumin, urea, creatinine, ALT, AST, uric acid, CRP, procalcitonin, and ferritin levels were measured by conventional laboratory methods on Cobas 8000 analyzer (Roche, Germany). Plasma fibrinogen level was detected on the Sysmex CS-2000i device (Sysmex, Japan). Thiol level was measured with the spectrophotometric method defined by Erel & Neselioglu [10]. TAS and TOS levels in serum were measured spectrophotomerically according to Erel’s method [15, 16]. Additionally, the OSI value of each participant was calculated by proportioning TOS to TAS [17].

Statistical analysis

SPSS 20.0 software (Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis of the data and a p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. The normality of the variables was determined by the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Comparison of variables between ICU and non-ICU COVID-19 groups was performed by Student’s t-test, Mann–Whitney U-test, or chi-square test when applicable. Correlations between oxidative stress parameters and inflammatory markers in COVID-19-infected patients were made using Pearson or Spearman correlation tests. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine whether thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI tests could distinguish ICU patients from non-ICU patients.

Results

A total of eighty-six COVID-19 patients, comprising 40 ICU and 46 non-ICU COVID-19 patients, were included in our study. Table 1 summarizes the age, sex, comorbidities, routine laboratory findings, and oxidative stress levels of all participants. There was no statistical difference between ICU and non-ICU COVID-19 patients in terms of age, gender, number of comorbidities, hemoglobin, platelet, creatinine, ALT, and uric acid levels (p > 0.05 for all). WBC (p < 0.001), neutrophil (p < 0.001), CRP (p < 0.001), procalcitonin (p < 0.001), ferritin (p < 0.001), fibrinogen (p = 0.043), AST (p = 0.001), and urea (p = 0.011) levels were found to be higher, and lymphocyte (p < 0.001) and albumin (p < 0.001) levels were found to be lower in ICU group compared to non-ICU group.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics and laboratory results of patients with COVID-19 on admission

ICU group(n = 40)Non-ICU group (n = 46)P value
Age, years63 (21–80)60.5 (20–83)0.815
Male gender, n (%)28 (70)25 (54.3)0.137
Comorbidities
Diabetes, n (%)6 (15)12 (26.1)0.207
Hypertension, n (%)15 (37.5)17 (37)0.959
Cardiovascular disease, n (%)9 (22.5)6 (13)0.249
Dyslipidemia, n (%)6 (15)7 (15.2)0.978
Respiratory system disease, n (%)6 (15)9 (19.6)0.578
Laboratory parameters
WBC, × 103/μL13.7 ± 6.46.9 ± 2.5 < 0.001
Neutrophil, × 103/µL10.5 ± 6.24.7 ± 2.4 < 0.001
Lymphocyte, × 103/μL0.83 (0.25–3.01)1.49 (0.46–3.79) < 0.001
Hemoglobin, g/dL13.2 ± 1.813.5 ± 1.60.485
Platelet, × 103/μL244 (108–707)232 (130–408)0.181
Albumin, g/dL3.31 ± 0.494.18 ± 0.49 < 0.001
Uric acid, mg/dL5.58 ± 2.815.13 ± 1.860.381
ALT, U/L27.7 (7.2–164.6)28.1 (7.7–132.5)0.729
AST, U/L42.3 (14.7–135.3)30.4 (10.7–138.8)0.001
Creatinine, mg/dL1.16 (0.52–2.43)1.08 (0.56–1.98)0.121
Urea, mg/dL45.7 (21.6–165.5)32.3 (18.5–72.4)0.011
CRP, mg/L114.2 (7.5–407.2)19.6 (0.6–236.8) < 0.001
Procalcitonin, ng/mL0.30 (0.03–2.15)0.08 (0.02–1.62) < 0.001
Ferritin, µg/L711.3 (34–2000)207.2 (35.9–1193) < 0.001
Fibrinogen, mg/dL527.9 ± 192.7446.3 ± 147.10.043
Thiol, µmol/L243.4 ± 36.7298.1 ± 49.9 < 0.001
TAS, mmol Trolox Equiv/L1.23 (0.66–1.59)1.39 (0.70–1.72) < 0.001
TOS, µmol H2O2 Equiv/L18.36 ± 4.7215.34 ± 2.640.001
OSI, arbitrary units1.54 (0.70–3.10)1.15 (0.62–2.01) < 0.001

Results are expressed as median (min–max), mean ± standard deviation and number (%). WBC white blood cell, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CRP C-reactive protein, TAS total antioxidant status, TOS total oxidant status, OSI oxidative stress index

Baseline characteristics and laboratory results of patients with COVID-19 on admission Results are expressed as median (min–max), mean ± standard deviation and number (%). WBC white blood cell, ALT alanine aminotransferase, AST aspartate aminotransferase, CRP C-reactive protein, TAS total antioxidant status, TOS total oxidant status, OSI oxidative stress index When the oxidative stress parameters of both patient groups were compared, it was seen that ICU patients had lower thiol (p < 0.001) levels than non-ICU patients. TOS (p = 0.001) and OSI (p < 0.001) levels were markedly higher in ICU patients than in non-ICU patients. On the contrary, TAS level was markedly lower (p < 0.001). The correlations between oxidative stress parameters and inflammatory marker levels in COVID-19 patients are shown in Table 2. Thiol levels were found to be inversely correlated with WBC, neutrophil, CRP, procalcitonin, ferritin, and fibrinogen. The TAS level was inversely correlated with the WBC, neutrophil, CRP, procalcitonin, and ferritin. On the contrary, TOS and OSI levels were positively correlated with the WBC, neutrophil, CRP, procalcitonin, and ferritin.
Table 2

Correlation between oxidative stress markers and inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients

ThiolTASTOSOSI
WBCr − 0.387 − 0.3790.2140.364
p < 0.001 < 0.0010.0480.001
Neutrophilr − 0.321 − 0.3770.3210.492
p0.003 < 0.0010.003 < 0.001
CRPr − 0.363 − 0.4210.3280.385
p0.001 < 0.0010.002 < 0.001
Procalcitoninr − 0.364 − 0.3150.2330.296
p0.0010.0030.0310.006
Ferritinr − 0.218 − 0.4030.2200.358
p0.047 < 0.0010.0440.001
Fibrinogenr − 0.309 − 0.0950.0030.117
p0.0070.4120.9790.315

WBC white blood cell, CRP C-reactive protein, TAS total antioxidant status, TOS total oxidant status, OSI oxidative stress index

Correlation between oxidative stress markers and inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients WBC white blood cell, CRP C-reactive protein, TAS total antioxidant status, TOS total oxidant status, OSI oxidative stress index ROC analysis indicated that the cut-off values of thiol [AUC (95% CI): 0.799 (0.705–0.893); sensitivity: 73.9%; specificity: 75%; p < 0.001], TAS [AUC (95% CI): 0.778 (0.679–0.877); sensitivity: 73.9%; specificity: 72.5%; p < 0.001], TOS [AUC (95% CI): 0.713 (0.599–0.827); sensitivity: 67.5%; specificity: 67.4%; p = 0.001], and OSI [AUC (95% CI): 0.780 (0.679–0.882), sensitivity: 72.5%; specificity: 73.9%; p < 0.001] were 262.9, 1.28, 16.6, and 1.26, respectively (Table 3 and Fig. 1).
Table 3

ROC analysis results of the thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI parameters

AUC (95% CI)Cut-off levelSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)P value
Thiol0.799 (0.705–0.893)262.973.975 < 0.001
TAS0.778 (0.679–0.877)1.2873.972.5 < 0.001
TOS0.713 (0.599–0.827)16.667.567.40.001
OSI0.780 (0.679–0.882)1.2672.573.9 < 0.001

TAS total antioxidant status, TOS total oxidant status, OSI oxidative stress index

Fig. 1

ROC curves of antioxidant (A) and oxidant parameters (B) to predict ICU admission in patients with COVID-19

ROC analysis results of the thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI parameters TAS total antioxidant status, TOS total oxidant status, OSI oxidative stress index ROC curves of antioxidant (A) and oxidant parameters (B) to predict ICU admission in patients with COVID-19

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first research to compare thiol, TOS, TAS, and OSI levels between COVID-19 patients with and without ICU requirement and investigate their predictive values for ICU admission. We detected that ICU patients had lower thiol and TAS levels than non-ICU patients. On the contrary, TOS and OSI levels were markedly higher in ICU patients. Inflammatory markers, including WBC, neutrophil, CRP, procalcitonin, and ferritin, were negatively correlated with the thiol and TAS, and positively correlated with the TOS and OSI. In addition, our data showed that thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI markers could be used to distinguish between COVID-19 patients with and without ICU need. The clinical presentation of COVID-19 infection ranges from asymptomatic/mild infection to lung injuries, ARDS, or even deaths [1, 19]. Due to the rapid spread of COVID-19 infection and its severe or critical course in susceptible individuals (e.g., elderly or patients with co-existing illnesses) [20, 21], there is an urgent need to understand the pathogenesis of the disease and find specific therapy options. Although the pathogenesis of COVID-19 is still not fully elucidated, oxidative stress, defined as the imbalance between the production of ROS and its elimination by antioxidants, is thought to be related to the pathogenesis and consequences of COVID-19 [2]. ROS triggers a transcription factor NF-κB-driven proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α and IL-6) as well as chemokines (e.g., macrophage inflammatory protein-1), and thus causing an uncontrolled cytokine storm that promotes acute lung injury/ARDS in COVID-19-infected patients [22]. Thiols are part of the antioxidant defense systems that prevent or mitigate the damage of cellular components (e.g., proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids) by ROS in the organism [23]. Recently, Erel et al. [13] investigated the thiol levels in COVID-19-infected patients and found that thiol levels were lower in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy individuals. Moreover, they observed a gradual decrease in thiol levels as the severity of the disease increased from mild to critical condition. In another study, thiol-disulfide balance was examined in COVID-19 patients, and it was seen that COVID-19 patients had lower levels of thiol and higher levels of disulfide than healthy individuals, suggesting that increased oxidative stress and impaired thiol-disulfide balance may play a vital role in the pathogenesis of COVID-19 infection. They also found that mild/moderate COVID-19 patients had higher thiol levels than severe COVID-19 patients [14]. Muhammad et al. [24] reported that the concentrations of antioxidant molecules (glutathione, glutathione peroxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase), antioxidant trace elements (copper, zinc, selenium, and manganese), and vitamins A, C, and E were markedly lower, while the level of 8-iso-prostaglandin F2α, a product of ROS-induced lipid oxidation, was markedly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to healthy controls. On the contrary, a study by Gadotti et al. [25] found no difference in levels of oxidative damage, and oxidant and antioxidant markers between moderate and severe COVID-19 patients. The researchers explained that these unexpected results may be due to the time of sample collection, as the moderate and severe groups were in the critical stage of COVID-19 disease. In addition, factors affecting oxidative stress such as gender, smoking, comorbidities, intake of vitamin, or antioxidant agent were not taken into account in their studies. In our study, thiol and TAS values were lower in ICU COVID-19 patients compared to non-ICU COVID-19 patients, whereas TOS and OSI values were determined higher. These findings show that the increase in oxidative stress and the decrease in antioxidant levels in infected patients are closely related to the increase in the severity of COVID-19 infection. We observed markedly elevated levels of inflammatory parameters, including WBC, neutrophils, CRP, procalcitonin, and ferritin in ICU COVID-19 patients compared to non-ICU COVID-19 patients, consistent with previous studies [26, 27]. Besides, these inflammatory markers were inversely correlated with thiol and TAS and positively correlated with TOS and OSI, demonstrating that inflammation plays a role in the imbalance between oxidant and antioxidant status in COVID-19 infection. It has also been postulated that smoking, male gender, old age, insufficient dietary intake, and pre-existing comorbidities like diabetes and cardiovascular diseases may contribute to this imbalance by causing a deficiency of thiol, and high ROS levels in COVID-19-infected patients [28]. In this study, we also investigated the efficacy of thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI parameters in distinguishing patients who require ICU care from patients who do not require ICU care. According to the ROC curve analysis, the AUCs of thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI markers were 0.799, 0.778, 0.713, and 0.780, respectively. These outcomes show that the thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI parameters can be used effectively in separating ICU patients from non-ICU patients, among which thiol was the best predictor of ICU admission in COVID-19-infected patients. Erel et al. [13] reported that thiol could be used as a potential marker to distinguish patients with COVID-19 infection from healthy controls with an AUC of 0.949 (sensitivity, 98.6%; specificity, 80.4%). Kalem et al. [14] also noted that thiol has a strong predictive value in distinguishing between mild/moderate COVID-19 patients and severe COVID-19 patients. These findings suggest that thiol may be a good candidate parameter for the diagnosis and prediction of severity of COVID-19 disease. Beneficial effects of antioxidant therapy have been reported in a wide variety of pathological conditions, including viral infections [29]. Recently, researchers have focused on the use of thiol-containing agents such as glutathione, N-acetylcysteine, and alpha-lipoic acid in the treatment of COVID-19 patients to reduce the extent of oxidative damage [30-32]. Glutathione, a tripeptide thiol compound, blocks the activation of NF-κB, which plays an important role in inflammation via many mechanisms such as inducing the expression of several proinflammatory genes, and can ultimately prevent cytokine storm [33]. Horowitz et al. [34] reported that administration of glutathione was effective in alleviating COVID-19 pneumonia-related dyspnea. N-acetylcysteine, a precursor of glutathione, has been proposed as a potential therapeutic agent against COVID-19 infection [31]. In a randomized study, it was observed that the administration of α-lipoic acid reduced the mortality rate in critically ill patients with COVID-19 from 77.8% to 37.5% [32]. Namely, supplementation with antioxidants such as thiols may increase treatment efficacy in patients suffering from COVID-19. However, further studies should be conducted on this subject. Our study has certain limitations. First, this study was conducted in a single center with a small study population. Second, thiol, TAS, TOS, and OSI biomarkers were measured on admission and continued monitoring and comparison could not be performed. Finally, oxidative stress parameters other than thiol, TAS, and TOS were not studied.

Conclusion

Herein, we found that ICU-COVID-19 patients had lower levels of thiol and TAS compared to non-ICU COVID-19 patients and higher TOS and OSI levels, suggesting that the enhancement of oxidative stress and reduction of antioxidant levels in patients with COVID-19 correlate with the increased severity of the disease. Our data also showed that thiol was the best predictor of ICU requirement in COVID-19-infected patients, followed by OSI, TAS, and TOS. Antioxidants such as thiol molecules can be considered an adjunctive therapeutic option in COVID-19 disease.
  22 in total

1.  A novel automated direct measurement method for total antioxidant capacity using a new generation, more stable ABTS radical cation.

Authors:  Ozcan Erel
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.281

Review 2.  Implications of oxidative stress on viral pathogenesis.

Authors:  Fernanda Caetano Camini; Camila Carla da Silva Caetano; Letícia Trindade Almeida; Cintia Lopes de Brito Magalhães
Journal:  Arch Virol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.574

3.  Thiol-disulphide balance and total oxidant-antioxidant status in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Authors:  Tuba Damar Çakırca; Mehmet Reşat Ceylan; İsmail Koyuncu; Gökhan Çakırca
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  Redox signalling and the control of cell growth and death.

Authors:  G Powis; M Briehl; J Oblong
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 12.310

Review 5.  Thiol-based antioxidants.

Authors:  S M Deneke
Journal:  Curr Top Cell Regul       Date:  2000

6.  Effects of anxiety and depression symptoms on oxidative stress in patients with alopecia areata.

Authors:  Gokhan Cakirca; Vildan Manav; Hakim Celik; Gülben Saracoglu; Esra Nur Yetkin
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 7.  Extracellular thiols and thiol/disulfide redox in metabolism.

Authors:  Siobhan E Moriarty-Craige; Dean P Jones
Journal:  Annu Rev Nutr       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.848

8.  A novel and automated assay for thiol/disulphide homeostasis.

Authors:  Ozcan Erel; Salim Neselioglu
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 3.281

9.  A useful and sensitive marker in the prediction of COVID-19 and disease severity: Thiol.

Authors:  Ayse Kaya Kalem; Bircan Kayaaslan; Salim Neselioglu; Fatma Eser; İmran Hasanoglu; Adalet Aypak; Esragul Akinci; H Nisa Akca; Ozcan Erel; Rahmet Guner
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2021-02-13       Impact factor: 7.376

Review 10.  COVID-19: Melatonin as a potential adjuvant treatment.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Xuebin Wang; Leng Ni; Xiao Di; Baitao Ma; Shuai Niu; Changwei Liu; Russel J Reiter
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 5.037

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The potential role of COVID-19 in the induction of DNA damage.

Authors:  Pablo Pánico; Patricia Ostrosky-Wegman; Ana María Salazar
Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 7.015

2.  Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Status in COVID-19 Outpatients: A Health Center-Based Analytical Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Sahar Golabi; Sheyda Ghasemi; Maryam Adelipour; Reza Bagheri; Katsuhiko Suzuki; Alexei Wong; Maryam Seyedtabib; Mahshid Naghashpour
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22

3.  The Impact of Severe COVID-19 on Plasma Antioxidants.

Authors:  Neven Žarković; Anna Jastrząb; Iwona Jarocka-Karpowicz; Biserka Orehovec; Bruno Baršić; Marko Tarle; Marta Kmet; Ivica Lukšić; Wojciech Łuczaj; Elżbieta Skrzydlewska
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-21       Impact factor: 4.927

4.  Dynamic Thiol Disulphide Homeostasis in the Follow-Up of the Prognosis of Patients Treated for COVID-19 in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Erdoğan Duran; Abdullah Taşkın; Basak Pehlivan; Hakim Çelik; Veli Fahri Pehlivan; Seyhan Taşkın
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-07-31

Review 5.  Green Tea Polyphenol (-)-Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate (EGCG): A Time for a New Player in the Treatment of Respiratory Diseases?

Authors:  Daniela Mokra; Jana Adamcakova; Juraj Mokry
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-13

Review 6.  Molecular Mechanisms Related to Responses to Oxidative Stress and Antioxidative Therapies in COVID-19: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Evangelia Eirini Tsermpini; Una Glamočlija; Fulden Ulucan-Karnak; Sara Redenšek Trampuž; Vita Dolžan
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.