Literature DB >> 34467222

Application of pseudotyped virus particles to monitor Ebola virus and SARS-CoV-2 viral entry in human cell lines.

Madeleine Eichler1, Ebru Aksi1, Josef Pfeilschifter1, Gergely Imre1.   

Abstract

Experimental work on highly pathogenic viruses such as Ebola virus (EBOV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 requires high-level biosafety facilities. Here, we provide a detailed step-by-step protocol which details the production and application of replication-incompetent murine leukemia virus-based pseudotyped particles to monitor and quantify the viral entry efficiency in human cell lines under biosafety level-2 conditions. We describe the use of viral particles encoding luciferase gene and the quantification of transduction efficiency by measuring luciferase activity. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Imre et al. (2021).
© 2021 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cell culture; Cell-based Assays; Immunology; Microbiology; Molecular Biology

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34467222      PMCID: PMC8390363          DOI: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  STAR Protoc        ISSN: 2666-1667


Before you begin

Here, we describe a protocol for the production of murine leukemia virus (MLV) based pseudoviruses. To generate pseudotyped vectors of highly pathogenic viruses, lentiviral vectors such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus based vectors are commonly employed as a first choice. Apart from the safety concerns of HIV based particles, it has been reported that in several cases higher yield can be achieved by the application of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and MLV derived systems when compared to lentiviral vectors (Temperton et al., 2007; Cosset et al., 2009). In comparison to the VSV based viral vectors MLV pseudoviruses are smaller. VSV viral particles are 200 nm in length and have a slightly elongated structure. In contrast, MLV viral vectors are 80–100 nm in size and have a spherical shape (Chen et al., 2019). The smaller size of the viral particles can result in higher yields and improved filtration efficacy of the viral particles. Similarly to replication-incompetent lentiviral and VSV pseudoviruses, MLV pseudoviruses accomplish a single round of infection, since instead of harboring viral RNA the viral particles only harbor the firefly luciferase RNA (Millet et al., 2019). Upon successful transduction of the MLV particles, the Luciferase gene integrates in the host genome and the light generating enzyme Luciferase is produced. This enables quantitative analysis of pseudovirus infectivity by measuring luciferase activity proportional to the detected luminescence intensity.

Biological safety

Any work involving genetically modified virus particles should be approved by national and institutional biosafety committees. Before starting, please make sure that your lab complies all the necessary criteria and documentations required to accomplish biosafety Level-2 (BSL-2) work.

Cell maintenance

Timing: 5–7 days Thaw HEK293T, EA.hy926 and HuH-7 cells (Figures 1A–1C) quickly at 37°C. Add the thawed cell suspension to 10 mL prewarmed complete medium (see step 2.) and spin at 200 × g for 4 min. Discard the supernatant and resuspend the cell pellet in fresh prewarmed complete medium. Incubate the cells in cell culture flask at 37°C with 5% CO2.
Figure 1

Microscopy pictures of cell lines

Microscopy pictures of (A) HEK293T, (B) EA.hy926 and (C) HuH-7 cells. The microscopy pictures were taken by Keyence BZ-8000K Microscope by using 20× 0.75 objective (200× magnification). The scale is 100 μm.

Microscopy pictures of cell lines Microscopy pictures of (A) HEK293T, (B) EA.hy926 and (C) HuH-7 cells. The microscopy pictures were taken by Keyence BZ-8000K Microscope by using 20× 0.75 objective (200× magnification). The scale is 100 μm. Maintain each cell lines in the recommended medium (see medium recipes in the materials and equipment section): HEK293T and HuH-7 cells in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Media (DMEM) (containing 4 mM glutamine, 4.5 g/l glucose) with 10% FBS and 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 100 units/mL penicillin. EA.hy926 cells in complete Roswell Park Memorial Institute 1640 (RPMI1640) media containing 10% FBS, 100 μg/mL streptomycin and 100 units/mL penicillin. Split cells: HEK293T cells: Remove the medium. Add prewarmed fresh complete medium onto the cells. Detach the cells by repeated up and down pipetting until the cell layer is completely removed from the surface. EA.hy926 and HuH-7 cells: Remove medium and rinse the cells twice with 5-5 mL 1× DPBS. Add 3.5 mL Trypsin/EDTA (0.05%), rinse the cells by gently swirling the cell culture flask and remove the rest of the Trypsin/EDTA solution, leaving just a thin layer covering the whole surface. Incubate it for 5 min at 37°C. Resuspend the cells in fresh, prewarmed complete medium. The splitting ratios for the cells are the following: HEK293T: 1:5; EA.hy926: 1:10; HuH-7: 1:5.

Prepare plasmids for transfection

Timing: 3–4 days Four plasmids need to be prepared in advance (Figure 2):
Figure 2

Plasmid maps

(A–D) (A) pCMV-MLV-gag-pol, (B) pCMV-MLV-Luc, (C) pCDNA3.1-EBOV-GP, (D) pCDNA3.1-SARS-CoV-2-Spike.

AmpR-Ampicillin resistance, ZeoR-Zeomycin resistance, NeoR/KanR- Neomycin/Kanamycin resistance, ori- bacterial origin of replication, CMV promoter-human Cytomegalovirus promoter, LTR-long terminal repeat, Poli (A) signal-poliadenyliation signal, bGh-bovine growth hormone.

Plasmid containing the Murine leukemia virus (MLV) gag and pol genes: pCMV-MLV-gag-pol (Bartosch et al., 2003; Millet and Whittaker, 2016; Millet et al., 2019). Reporter vector encoding the firefly luciferase (Luc) gene with a viral packaging sequence: pCMV-Luc (Bartosch et al., 2003; Millet and Whittaker, 2016; Millet et al., 2019). Plasmids encoding viral envelope proteins of interests: pcDNA3.1- Ebola virus glycoprotein (EBOV-GP) or pcDNA3.1-SARS-CoV-2-Spike (SARS-CoV-2-S). Empty vector as control plasmid: pcDNA3-Flag-HA. Plasmid maps (A–D) (A) pCMV-MLV-gag-pol, (B) pCMV-MLV-Luc, (C) pCDNA3.1-EBOV-GP, (D) pCDNA3.1-SARS-CoV-2-Spike. AmpR-Ampicillin resistance, ZeoR-Zeomycin resistance, NeoR/KanR- Neomycin/Kanamycin resistance, ori- bacterial origin of replication, CMV promoter-human Cytomegalovirus promoter, LTR-long terminal repeat, Poli (A) signal-poliadenyliation signal, bGh-bovine growth hormone. Transform bacterial competent cells XL-1 Blue (Agilent) by employing standard heat shock transformation procedure. Grow the transformed bacteria on agar plates containing ampicillin (100 μg/mL) overnight (16 h) at 37°C. Pick a single colony and incubate it in 100 mL LB media supplemented with 100 μg/mL ampicillin overnight at 37°C in a shaker incubator. Lyse the bacteria and extract the produced plasmid DNAs by employing standard midi prep columns. We use Nucleo Bond DNA extraction kit (Macherey Nagel, Cat#740573.100). Determine the concentration of the plasmid DNAs by nanodrop method and adjust it to 1 μg/mL.

Key resources table

Materials and equipment

Complete DMEM medium

Add the following ingredients to DMEM (containing 4 mM glutamine, 4.5 g/l glucose): Storage at 4°C (max. till date of expire)

Complete RPMI1640 medium

Add the following ingredients to RPMI1640 (containing 2 mM glutamine, 2 g/l glucose): Storage at 4°C (max. till date of expire)

Luciferase Lysis Buffer

We have employed Luciferase Lysis Buffer (Cat#E1531) provided by the company Promega, however lysis buffer can be also self-prepared by using the following recipe: Store Luciferase Lysis Buffer at −20°C (max. 1 month) or at −80°C (max. 1 year).

Luciferase Substrate

We have used Luciferase Assay System, including Luciferase Assay Substrate (luciferin, lyophilized) and Luciferase Assay Buffer for Luciferase activity detection (Cat#E1500, Promega), however alternatively the following Luciferase Substrate Protocol adapted from Ratnapriya et al., (2020) can also be applied: Solution A: Firefly Luciferase Assay Buffer Store Firefly Luciferase Assay Buffer in the dark at −20°C (max. 1 month) or at −80°C (max. 1 year).

Solution B: Luciferin substrate solution

Dissolve lyophilized D-Luciferin (#122799, Perkin Elmer) in ddH2O adjusted to pH 6.3. Prepare aliquots with 225 μg/mL concentration and store them at −20°C (max. 1 month) or at −80°C (max. 1 year).

Step-by-step method details

Production of recombinant MLV-EBOV-GP/MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S replication-incompetent pseudoviruses

Timing: 4 days In these steps, the MLV-EBOV-GP or MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudovirus particles will be produced by employing co-transfection of three plasmids in HEK293T cells. Day 1. Keep HEK293T cells in cell culture for at least 2 passages (Ratnapriya et al., 2020) and maximum 20 passages before starting the experiment. The cells should grow exponentially and exhibit healthy morphology (Figure 1A). Wash HEK293T cells gently with 1× DPBS and resuspend them in fresh complete DMEM medium. Detach the cells with repeated up and down pipetting. Count the cells by using a hemocytometer and adjust the cell concentration to 5 × 105 cells/well in a 6-well plate. Ideally, the cells should reach 50–60% confluency at the day of transfection. Day 2. Transfection of the cells. CRITICAL: At this point, continue the work in a BSL-2 facility. Before starting, make sure that all the required equipment for BSL-2 work, waste management and decontamination are available and properly function. Prepare all the necessary solutions for decontamination in a sufficient amount. Replace the medium with 1 mL fresh complete DMEM medium/well. Prepare the transfection complex solution in a 1.5 mL tube. Table 1 shows the amount of reagents needed for 1 well of a 6-well plate. After mixing the OPTI-MEM and Genejuice, briefly vortex and spin (200 × g, 30 s) the solution, and incubate it for 5 min at room temperature (RT; 20°C–23°C).
Table 1

Transfection complex solution

ReagentFinal amount
OPTI-MEM100 μL
Genejuice7.2 μL
pCMV-MLV-gag-pol0.6 μg
pCMV-Luc1.2 μg
Viral envelope protein vector/control vector0.6 μg
Components of the transfection mixture. The final amounts for the transfection complex solution are sufficient for 1 well of a 6-well plate. The ratio of total plasmid to Genejuice is 1:3. Other commercially available or self-prepared transfection reagents can also be employed. We describe the protocol by employing Genejuice transfection reagent. Add pCMV-MLV-gag-pol, pCMV-Luc and pcDNA3.1-EBOV-GP or pcDNA3.1-SARS-CoV-2-S to the transfection reagent mix and briefly vortex/spin (200 × g, 30 s) the sample. Table 1 demonstrates the amounts of plasmids necessary for efficient pseudovirus production. To produce MLV pseudovirus particles without viral surface glycoprotein (MLV-control) add pCMV-MLV-gag-pol, pCMV-Luc and pcDNA3.1 empty vector to the transfection complex solution and briefly vortex/spin (200 × g, 30 s) the sample. After 15 min incubation, the transfection complex solution is gently pipetted drop-wise on the cells. The transfection complex solutions are mixed by gentle swirling of the plates to ensure equal distribution. The transfected cells are incubated in a cell culture incubator at 37°C and with 5% CO2. 6 h later, replace the medium with fresh complete medium by gentle pipetting. CRITICAL: It is important to remove the medium with extra caution in order to avoid cell loss, because HEK293T cells tend to detach easily from plastic surfaces. Day 3. Collect the pseudovirus supernatants at 24 h after medium change in 50 mL centrifuge tubes, store them at −80°C and add 1 mL fresh complete DMEM on the cells. Day 4. Collect the pseudoviral supernatants of the cells in 50 mL centrifuge tubes at 48 h after medium change, store them at −80°C. The two batches are stored separately. Cells tend to round up and detach at this stage. In general, the medium does not show significant pH changes at this stage. The color of medium does not turn to yellow or purple. Pause point: At this point, pseudoviral supernatants can be stored at −80°C until further usage. Alternatively, according to our experiments viral supernatants can be stored in −20°C for a shorter period of time (∼1 week) without losing efficiency. Thaw the pseudoviral supernatants and pool the two batches. Next, filter them by employing a 0.45 μm PVDF filter unit to remove cell debris. Store the filtered pseudoviral supernatants at −80°C. Centrifugation can be employed prior to filtration to remove cell debris (600–900 × g for 8 minutes at 4°C). This might help to avoid clotting of the cells in the filter. Prepare aliquots of the pseudoviral supernatants (e.g. 1-1 mL), which can be completely used up for a single experiment in order to avoid freeze-thaw cycles. Pause point: At this point, viral supernatants can be kept at −80°C until further usage. In order to confirm efficient transfection, wash and lyse the remaining cells (1 well/6-well) in plate employing 55 μL luciferase lysis buffer. Transfer 50 μL cell lysate to a 96-well white microtiter plate and incubate it for 15 min at RT. Add 90 μL luciferin substrate to the lysates and measure the luciferase activity immediately by a luminometer with 500 ms integration. We typically measure ∼8–10 × 107 Relative Luminescence Unit (RLU) in 1 well of a 6-well plate of HEK293T cells. Transfection complex solution

Transduction of EA.Hy926 cells with MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviruses

We employed EA.hy926 endothelial hybridoma cells because they are susceptible to Ebola virus infection (Imre et al., 2021). In these steps, human EAhy.926 cells are transduced by MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral particles. The pseudovirus entry efficiency is quantified by measuring luciferase activity. Timing: 3 days Day 1. Keep EA.hy926 cells in cell culture. In our experiments, we leave cells in cell culture for at least 2 passages before starting the transduction. The cells should grow exponentially and exhibit healthy morphology (Figure 1B). Wash EA.hy926 cells with 1× DPBS and detach the cells by employing Trypsin/EDTA (0.05%) typically incubating less than 5 min at 37°C. Resuspend the cells in 10 mL prewarmed fresh complete RPMI1640 medium and count the cells. Seed 2 × 105 cells in 1 mL/well in a 12-well plate to reach 70–80% confluency on the next day. Day 2. Thaw MLV-control/MLV-EBOV-GP viral supernatants and prewarm them at 37°C (not longer than 15 min prior to experiment). Completely remove medium on the cells and replace it with 1-1 mL pseudoviral supernatant. Incubate the cells at 37°C in 5% CO2. In our experiments, the optimal titer to infect the cells is the undiluted pseudoviral supernatant. Prior to first measurement, it is recommended to titrate the pseudoviruses. Make 1:2 serial dilution of the supernatants as shown in Figure 3A. Measure luciferase activity as described at step 12 and plot a Titer/Relative Luminescence Unit (RLU) curve to determine the most efficient volume for transduction (Figure 3B).
Figure 3

Two-fold serial dilution of MLV-control and MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral supernatants

(A) Dilution scheme on a 12-well plate using three technical replicates. The increasing darkness of the color represents the increasing concentration of the pseudovirus particles in the actual well. MLV-control is depicted with gray and MLV-EBOV-GP is depicted with orange color. The red numbers represent the volume of the pseudovirus supernatants and the black numbers show the volume of complete medium in one well (total volume is 1 mL/well).

(B) The detected light intensity by employing a 1:2 serial dilution of the viral supernatants measured by luminometer. EA.hy926 cells were transduced with indicated volumes of MLV-control and MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral supernatants. The samples were harvested at 24 h and luciferase activity was measured as described in the protocol (n=3). The data represent means +/- sd.

Day 3. Detection of the luciferase activity Thaw the Luciferase Lysis Buffer and prepare sufficient amount of 1× solution by adding ddH2O to the concentrate. Prepare the Luciferase substrate by dissolving Luciferase Assay Substrate (lyophilized) with Luciferase Assay Buffer. Prepare aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles and store them at −80°C. Remove the supernatant of the cells. Wash the cells by using 300 μL 1× DPBS solution and add 200 μL Trypsin/EDTA (0.05%) solution to the cells. Incubate at 37°C for 5 min. Some proportion of the infected cells tend to float, therefore it is recommended to keep the removed supernatant and the 1× DPBS that was used for washing the cells, and pool them together with the trypsinized cells (step d.). Stop the reaction by adding 300 μL complete medium onto the cells. Detach the cells by gently pipetting up and down. Collect the cells in 1.5 mL tubes. Centrifuge the cells at 200 × g for 4 min at RT and discard supernatant carefully. Resuspend the cell pellet with 1 mL 1× DPBS and centrifuge at 200 × g for 4 min. Carefully discard the supernatant and use a 200 μL tip to completely remove the rest of the supernatant without disturbing the cell pellet. Add 55 μL Luciferase Lysis Buffer (1×) to the cell pellet and mix by pipetting up and down few times. Avoid bubbles. Incubate the lysates for 15 min at RT. During incubation time the following steps should be accomplished: Transfer 50 μL lysate to 96-well white microtiter plate. Thaw the Luciferase Substrate 10–15 min prior to detection at RT. Colder temperatures can negatively influence luciferase activity therefore make sure that the substrate temperature reaches RT before usage. Protect the Luciferase substrate from light. Start the luminometer and setup the detection software. We employ 500 ms integration time. We have tested various integration times. Integration times between 5 ms and 1000 ms showed no significance differences. Short, 1 ms integration time results in bigger variability of the data. Too long integration time can cause a delay in the sample detection of the subsequent samples leading to different incubation intervals. Add 90 μL of Luciferase Substrate to 50 μL lysate and mix the samples by carefully swirling the plate. Start measurement after 20 s incubation period at RT. Alternatively to the use of Luciferase Substrate from Promega, after cell lysis and transfer of the cell lysates into 96-Well microplate (see step 12i.), add 100 μl of Firefly Luciferase Assay Buffer (Solution A, see materials and equipment) and 50 μl Luciferin Substrate Solution (Solution B, see materials and equipment). Measure after 20 seconds incubation at RT with luminometer (see step 12k.). Since the peak intensity of detected light starts to slowly decline typically in 3–4 minutes after adding the substrate, it is recommended to use multichannel pipette for simultaneous sample detection of multiple samples. Alternatively, plate readers equipped with injectors can be employed, which ensure unified time interval between substrate injection and detection. In general, longer incubation time than 24 hours results in a minimal increase of the detected luminescence intensity. However, 48 hours incubation leads to higher variability of the results. Therefore, we typically used 24 hours for detection. Figures 4A and 4B show the comparison between 24 and 48 hours measurements. Others reported that the luciferase activity peaks at 24 h (Ebola-GP) and 48 h (SARS-CoV-2-S) by employing VSV pseudotyped viruses (Lay Mendoza et al., 2020).
Figure 4

Detection of luciferase activity on MLV pseudovirus transduced cell lines

(A) EA.hy926 cells were transduced with 1-1 mL MLV-control and MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral supernatants. The samples were harvested after 24 and 48 h (24 h and 48 h) and luciferase activity was measured as described in the protocol. The data represent means +/- sd. To test significance Student′s t-test was performed. ∗∗∗p<0.001; ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001; ns-non significant. n=4 (24 h) and n=3 (48 h).

(B) HuH-7 cells were transduced with 1-1 mL MLV-control and MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudoviral supernatants. The samples were harvested and luciferase activity was measured at 24 and 48 h as described in the protocol. The data represent means +/- sd. To test significance Student′s t-test was performed. ∗∗∗p<0.001; ns-non significant. n=4 (24 h) and n=3 (48 h).

Two-fold serial dilution of MLV-control and MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral supernatants (A) Dilution scheme on a 12-well plate using three technical replicates. The increasing darkness of the color represents the increasing concentration of the pseudovirus particles in the actual well. MLV-control is depicted with gray and MLV-EBOV-GP is depicted with orange color. The red numbers represent the volume of the pseudovirus supernatants and the black numbers show the volume of complete medium in one well (total volume is 1 mL/well). (B) The detected light intensity by employing a 1:2 serial dilution of the viral supernatants measured by luminometer. EA.hy926 cells were transduced with indicated volumes of MLV-control and MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral supernatants. The samples were harvested at 24 h and luciferase activity was measured as described in the protocol (n=3). The data represent means +/- sd. Detection of luciferase activity on MLV pseudovirus transduced cell lines (A) EA.hy926 cells were transduced with 1-1 mL MLV-control and MLV-EBOV-GP pseudoviral supernatants. The samples were harvested after 24 and 48 h (24 h and 48 h) and luciferase activity was measured as described in the protocol. The data represent means +/- sd. To test significance Student′s t-test was performed. ∗∗∗p<0.001; ∗∗∗∗p<0.0001; ns-non significant. n=4 (24 h) and n=3 (48 h). (B) HuH-7 cells were transduced with 1-1 mL MLV-control and MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudoviral supernatants. The samples were harvested and luciferase activity was measured at 24 and 48 h as described in the protocol. The data represent means +/- sd. To test significance Student′s t-test was performed. ∗∗∗p<0.001; ns-non significant. n=4 (24 h) and n=3 (48 h).

Transduction of HuH-7 cells with MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudoviruses

HuH-7 cells were selected for transduction experiments because they express angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2), the host binding site of the SARS-CoV-2-Spike protein and therefore these cells are susceptible to infection (Hoffmann et al., 2020). In these steps, human HuH-7 cells are transduced by MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudoviral particles. The pseudovirus entry efficiency is quantified by measuring luciferase activity at 24 h. Timing: 3 days Day 1. Keep HuH-7 cells in cell culture for at least 2 passages before starting the experiment. The cells should grow exponentially and exhibit healthy morphology (Figure 1C). Wash HuH-7 cells with 1× DPBS and detach the cells by trypsinization typically incubating less than 5 min at 37°C. Resuspend the cells in 10 mL prewarmed fresh complete DMEM medium. Here we describe the transduction of HuH-7 cells, which are permissive to corona viruses (Freymuth et al., 2005), however other permissive cell lines, such as Caco2 cells can be also transduced by MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudoviruses (Hoffmann et al., 2020). Seed 2 × 105 cells/well in a 12-well plate to reach 70–80% confluency on the next day. Day 2. Thaw MLV-control/MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S pseudoviral supernatants and prewarm them at 37°C. Completely remove medium on the cells and replace it with 1-1 mL pseudoviral supernatant. Incubate the cells at 37°C in 5% CO2. Day 3. Detection of the luciferase activity. The next steps are identical to step 12. Please follow the sub-steps described under step 12.

Expected outcomes

The detection of luminescence typically results in approximately 2 orders of magnitude increase in relative luminescence unit (RLU) by employing the MLV-EBOV-GP particles in EA.hy926 cells (Figure 4A) and 1-2 orders of magnitude increase by employing the MLV-SARS-CoV-2-S particles in HuH-7 cells (Figure 4B).

Quantification and statistical analysis

All experiments have been repeated at least three times. To test statistical significance of the results Student′s t test (unpaired, two tailed) was applied. The significance is indicated as ∗∗∗p<0.001 or ns-non significant.

Limitations

The produced MLV pseudoviruses are replication-incompetent. Thus, this method is not suitable for studies aiming at investigating the processes of de novo virus production, viral replication and viral budding. In addition, in combination application of chemical compounds that result in additional light emission/light absorption might interfere with luciferase activity measurement leading to false positive/negative results. For instance, employing the fluorescent compound Doxorubicin increases the detected light intensity (Calvert and Vohra, 2013) and the application of carbon nanotubes may lead to reduced measured light intensity in luminescence detection assays (Szymanski et al., 2020).

Troubleshooting

Problem 1

No virus production due to poor plasmid yield. If the luciferase measurement of the transfected HEK293T cells exhibited no sufficient intensity increase (see step 8), it can indicate low yield of plasmids.

Potential solution

Make sure that the amount of the plasmids is sufficient by measuring the concentration of the DNA. If necessary, prepare new plasmid stocks (“before you begin” steps 5–9). Check, if the plasmids harbor the correct, not mutated, inserts by employing gene sequencing.

Problem 2

No virus production due to poor transfection efficiency If the luciferase measurement of the transfected HEK293T cells exhibited no sufficient intensity increase (see step 8), and the plasmid concentration is sufficient, it might indicate poor transfection efficiency of the plasmids. Make sure that HEK293T cells exhibit healthy morphology (Figure 1A) and reach 50–60% confluency at the time of transfection. If the cells exceed 20 passages, thaw new cells. Mycoplasma infection can substantially influence transfection efficiency. Make sure that the cells are mycoplasma free. Transfection reagent is expired or was stored at room temperature for longer period of time (>24 h). Use/prepare fresh transfection reagent.

Problem 3

Pseudovirus loss during filtration. The Luminescence intensity is low in pseudovirus transduced cells due to not sufficient pseudovirus concentration. If the luciferase measurement of the transfected HEK293T cells exhibited sufficient intensity increase (see step 8), it indicates efficient transfection of the plasmids. Therefore, the problem might have occurred in the subsequent (steps 9–12) steps, possibly at the pseudovirus filtration. Make sure that you use filter units with 0.45 μm pores. Based on our experiments, application of 0.22 μm filters might also work, however they result in significantly less yields. In addition, check the manufacturer′s site for the specification of the filters. The application of filters with reduced binding capacity is required to avoid the attachment of viral particle to the filters. Furthermore, increased mechanical stress by intense up and down pipetting may also lead to destruction of the pseudovirus particles.

Problem 4

Too many freeze-thaw cycles of the pseudoviral supernatants. In addition, repeated freeze-thaw cycles can result in loss of transduction efficiency of the pseudoviruses. Please make sure to prepare aliquots as suggested at step 7. Try to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Repeated freeze-thaw cycles can strongly influence pseudovirus infectivity. Store the viral supernatants at −80°C. The best infectivity is achieved, if the pseudoviruses used immediately after filtration without freezing.

Problem 5

Luminescence intensity is low The luminescence intensity is low in pseudovirus infected cell lysates, however western blot analysis of the transduced lysates detects high amount of luciferase. This indicates that the pseudovirus transduction of the cells worked efficiently and the cells produced Luciferase protein. The problem might have occurred at step 12. Possible causes: Luciferase substrate does not work (a), trypsin does not work (b) or cells were lost during centrifugation steps (c). To resolve problem (a), prepare small aliquots of the dissolved substrate and store them at −80°C. Try to avoid repeated freeze-thaw cycles. Check the pH of the buffer solutions. The optimal pH is 7.8. Protect substrates from light. To resolve problem (b), after 5 min incubation with Trypsin/EDTA (step 12c) check if the cells are completely detached by employing a cell culture microscope. If not, use fresh, prewarmed Trypsin/EDTA solution to detach the cells. To resolve problem (c), check at steps 12e and f, if you see visible pellet after centrifugation. Make sure that you don′t lose pellet during discarding the supernatants.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Gergely Imre (gimre80@gmail.com).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.
REAGENT or RESOURCESOURCEIDENTIFIER
Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

AmpicillinSigma-AldrichCat#A5354
Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM + GlutaMAX-I)GibcoCat#61965-026
Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)GibcoCat#14190-094
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)Sigma-AldrichCat#F7524-500ML
Genejuice Transfection ReagentMERCK-MilliporeCat#70967-1ML
Minimum Essential Medium (MEM)GibcoCat#31095-029
LB-AgarRothCat#X969.1
LB-MediumRothCat#968.1
OPTI-MEMGibcoCat#31985-062
Penicillin-streptomycin (Pen Strep)Sigma-AldrichCat#15140-122
RPMI Medium 1640 + GlutaMAX-IGibcoCat#61870-010
Trypsin-EDTA 0.05%GibcoCat#25300-054
D-LuciferinPerkin ElmerCat#122799

Critical commercial assays

Luciferase Assay System, containing Luciferase Lysis Buffer, Luciferase Assay Substrate (lyophilized) and Luciferase Assay BufferPromegaCat#E1500
Luciferase Lysis BufferPromegaCat#E1531
Nucleo Bond DNA extraction kitMacherey NagelCat#740573.100

Experimental models: cell lines

EA.hy926Dr. Josef PfeilschifterEdgell et al. (1983)
HEK293TATCCCRL-11268
HuH-7JCRB Cell BankJCRB0403 RRID:CVCL0336

Bacterial and virus strains

XL-1 Blue Competent CellsAgilentCat#200249

Recombinant DNA

Plasmid: pcDNA3-Flag-HAAddgene #10792, gift from Dr. William Sellershttp://n2t.net/addgene:10792; RRID:Addgene_10792
Plasmid: pcDNA3.1-SARS-CoV-2-SpikeAddgene #145032, gift from Dr. Fang Li (Shang et al., 2020)http://n2t.net/addgene:145032; RRID:Addgene_145032
Plasmid: pcDNA3.1-zEBOV-GPGift from Dr. Fatah Kashanchi, Laboratory of Molecular Virology, George Mason University ManassasPleet et al. (2016)
Plasmid: pCMV-MLV-gag-polDr. Stefan PöhlmannBartosch et al. (2003)
Plasmid: pCMV-LucDr. Stefan PöhlmannBartosch et al. (2003); Millet and Whittaker (2016); Millet et al. (2019)

Software and algorithms

SoftMax Pro SoftwareMolecular DevicesVersion 5.4.6.005

Others

6-Well cell culture plateGreinerCat#657160
12-Well cell culture plateGreinerCat#665180
96-Well white microplateCorning-CostarCat#CLS3922
Cell culture flask with filter cap 75 cm2GreinerCat#658175
Centrifuge tube 50 mLGreinerCat#227261
Filtertube 0.45 μm PVDFMerck-MilliporeCat#SE2M230I04
LuminometerMolecular DevicesSpectraMax M5E
Nanodrop ND-1000 SpectrophotometerThermo Scientific#2353-30-0010
Pipettes 200 μL-1 mL, 20–200 μL and 0.5 μL–10 μLEppendorf Research Plus3123000063; 3123000055; 3123000020
Pipette tips 1 mL, 200 μL, 10 μLSarstedt70.3050; 70.3030; 70.1130
ReagentFinal concentration
FBS10%
Streptomycin100 μg/mL
Penicillin100 units/mL

Storage at 4°C (max. till date of expire)

ReagentFinal concentration
FBS10%
Streptomycin100 μg/mL
Penicillin100 units/mL

Storage at 4°C (max. till date of expire)

ReagentFinal concentration
Tris-phosphate (pH 7.8)25 mM
Dithiothreitol (DTT)2 mM
1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N‘,N‘-tetraacetic acid (DCTA)2 mM
Glycerol10% (w/v)
Triton X-1001% (w/v)

Solution A: Firefly Luciferase Assay Buffer

ReagentFinal concentration
MgSO415 mM
Phosphate Buffer (KH2PO4/K2HPO4) pH 7.815 mM
ATP1 mM
DTT1 mM
  16 in total

1.  Production of Pseudotyped Particles to Study Highly Pathogenic Coronaviruses in a Biosafety Level 2 Setting.

Authors:  Jean K Millet; Tiffany Tang; Lakshmi Nathan; Javier A Jaimes; Hung-Lun Hsu; Susan Daniel; Gary R Whittaker
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Permanent cell line expressing human factor VIII-related antigen established by hybridization.

Authors:  C J Edgell; C C McDonald; J B Graham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Characterization of Lassa virus cell entry and neutralization with Lassa virus pseudoparticles.

Authors:  François-Loic Cosset; Philippe Marianneau; Geraldine Verney; Fabrice Gallais; Noel Tordo; Eve-Isabelle Pécheur; Jan ter Meulen; Vincent Deubel; Birke Bartosch
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-01-19       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Infectious hepatitis C virus pseudo-particles containing functional E1-E2 envelope protein complexes.

Authors:  Birke Bartosch; Jean Dubuisson; François-Loïc Cosset
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2003-03-03       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  A Protocol for Studying HIV-1 Envelope Glycoprotein Function.

Authors:  Sneha Ratnapriya; Angela Chov; Alon Herschhorn
Journal:  STAR Protoc       Date:  2020-10-14

6.  Monitoring Viral Entry in Real-Time Using a Luciferase Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Producing SARS-CoV-2, EBOV, LASV, CHIKV, and VSV Glycoproteins.

Authors:  Maria Fernanda Lay Mendoza; Marissa Danielle Acciani; Courtney Nina Levit; Christopher Santa Maria; Melinda Ann Brindley
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  The sphingosine kinase 1 activator, K6PC-5, attenuates Ebola virus infection.

Authors:  Gergely Imre; Verena Krähling; Madeleine Eichler; Sandra Trautmann; Nerea Ferreirós; M Javad Aman; Fatah Kashanchi; Krishnaraj Rajalingam; Stefan Pöhlmann; Stephan Becker; Dagmar Meyer Zu Heringdorf; Josef Pfeilschifter
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-03-05

8.  A sensitive retroviral pseudotype assay for influenza H5N1-neutralizing antibodies.

Authors:  Nigel J Temperton; Katja Hoschler; Diane Major; Carolyn Nicolson; Ruth Manvell; Vo Minh Hien; Do Quang Ha; Menno de Jong; Maria Zambon; Yasuhiro Takeuchi; Robin A Weiss
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.380

9.  Structural basis of receptor recognition by SARS-CoV-2.

Authors:  Jian Shang; Gang Ye; Ke Shi; Yushun Wan; Chuming Luo; Hideki Aihara; Qibin Geng; Ashley Auerbach; Fang Li
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.