| Literature DB >> 34465975 |
Hong The Nguyen1,2, Ngoc Dong Pham3, Tung Quoc Mai2, Hang Thi Thuy Do3, Duong Thi Nga Nguyen3, Peter McCluskey4, Trong Van Pham2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate the result of tectonic deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratitis with perforation and descemetocele. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective clinical study of 36 patients (36 eyes) treated with tectonic DALK for corneal perforation or descemetocele from microbial keratitis managed at the Vietnam National Eye Hospital over a two-year period. The surgical technique was manual lamellar dissection. The grafts were harvested from the anterior corneal cap of pre-cut donor tissues used for DSAEK or donor corneas with a low endothelial cell count.Entities:
Keywords: DALK; corneal perforation; corneal transplantation; deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; descemetocele
Year: 2021 PMID: 34465975 PMCID: PMC8403223 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S324390
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
VNEH Subjective Grading Scheme
| Grade Clarity | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| Clear graft | Observable iris details |
| Mild opaque graft | Good view of pupil edges and no view of iris details |
| Severe opaque graft | No view of pupil edges |
Pathogens and Preoperative Time
| Causes | Number of Patients (%) | Mean Pre-Operative Course (Day) |
|---|---|---|
| Herpes Simplex Virus | 21 (58.3) | 70.6 |
| Bacteria | 8 (22.2) | 37.0 |
| Fungi | 5 (13.9) | 105.4 |
| Microsporidia | 2 (5.6) | 270 |
Pre- and Post-Operative Visual Acuity
| Patient | Age (Yrs.) | Gender | Pathogen | Time After the Onset (Days) | Defect Location | Graft Diameter | Pre-Op VA | Post-Op VA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 67 | Female | HSV | 65 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 2m |
| 2 | 35 | Male | HSV | 56 | Central | 7.5 | HM | 20/200 |
| 3 | 51 | Male | HSV | 90 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 2m |
| 4 | 59 | Male | Fungi | 90 | Paracentral | 5.5 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 5 | 43 | Male | Fungi | 210 | Peripheral | 5.5 | 20/400 | 20/160 |
| 6 | 25 | Male | HSV | 30 | Central | 7.0 | HM | 20/200 |
| 7 | 57 | Female | Fungi | 90 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 8 | 29 | Male | Bacteria | 18 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 2m |
| 9 | 74 | Female | Microsporidia | 180 | Central | 7.0 | CF at 0.6m | Failed |
| 10 | 66 | Male | HSV | 65 | Paracentral | 3.0 | CF at 2m | CF at 2m |
| 11 | 54 | Female | Bacteria | 25 | Peripheral | 3.0 | 20/160 | 20/70 |
| 12 | 40 | Male | Bacteria | 20 | Peripheral | 3.0 | 20/100 | 20/60 |
| 13 | 51 | Male | HSV | 67 | Paracentral | 7.5 | HM | 20/200 |
| 14 | 74 | Male | Fungi | 47 | Peripheral | 3.0 | HM | 20/400 |
| 15 | 34 | Male | HSV | 17 | Paracentral | 3.0 | CF at 1m | 20/200 |
| 16 | 62 | Female | HSV | 34 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 17 | 51 | Male | HSV | 60 | Central | 7.5 | HM | HM |
| 18 | 62 | Male | HSV | 90 | Central | 7.0 | HM | CF at 0.6m |
| 19 | 62 | Female | Bacteria | 37 | Central | 7.5 | HM | 20/400 |
| 20 | 71 | Female | HSV | 18 | Central | 6.5 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 21 | 41 | Male | HSV | 30 | Paracentral | 7.0 | CF at 2m | CF at 0.6m |
| 22 | 48 | Female | Fungi | 90 | Paracentral | 5.5 | CF at 2m | 20/100 |
| 23 | 73 | Male | Bacteria | 90 | Paracentral | 7.5 | CF at 0.6m | CF at 1m |
| 24 | 75 | Female | Bacteria | 16 | Paracentral | 7.5 | CF at 0.6m | 20/400 |
| 25 | 69 | Male | HSV | 30 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 26 | 67 | Male | HSV | 90 | Central | 7.5 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 27 | 64 | Male | Bacteria | 30 | Peripheral | 5.5 | 20/400 | 20/160 |
| 28 | 64 | Female | HSV | 26 | Central | 8.0 | HM | CF at 0.6m |
| 29 | 37 | Female | HSV | 30 | Central | 8.0 | HM | 20/400 |
| 30 | 47 | Female | HSV | 120 | Paracentral | 9.0 | CF at 1m | CF at 1m |
| 31 | 52 | Male | Microsporidia | 360 | Central | 8.0 | HM | Failed |
| 32 | 36 | Female | HSV | 360 | Central | 8.0 | HM | 20/160 |
| 33 | 67 | Male | HSV | 25 | Central | 8.0 | HM | CF at 1m |
| 34 | 57 | Male | HSV | 60 | Paracentral | 8.0 | HM | Failed |
| 35 | 60 | Female | Bacteria | 60 | Paracentral | 8.0 | CF at 0.6m | 20/400 |
| 36 | 69 | Female | HSV | 120 | Paracentral | 8.0 | CF at 0.6m | 20/120 |
Notes: DALK using anterior lamellar tissue after DSAEK preparation. DALK using corneas with low endothelial cell density.
Abbreviations: HSV, Herpes simplex virus; HM, Hand movement, CF, Counting fingers; Yrs., Years.
Figure 1Two cases with successful surgery. Case 1. (A) 37-year-old female with a corneal perforation from Herpes Simplex keratitis. (B) Positive Seidel test. (C) Lamellar graft was performed with a good result at one-year follow-up (pre- and postoperative BCVA from hand movement to 20/200). Case 2. (D) A 69-year-old female with a corneal descemetocele from Herpes Simplex keratitis. (E) Negative Seidel test. (F) The graft was harvested from residual tissue after DSAEK. A good result was observed at one-year follow-up (pre and postoperative BCVA from hand movement to 20/120).
Surgical Result by and Pathogen and Type of Grafts
| Result | Success N (%) | Failure N (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Herpes Simplex | 20 (95.2%) | 1 (4.8%) |
| Bacteria | 8 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Fungi | 5 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Microsporidia | 0 (0%) | 2 (100%) |
| Anterior corneal cap from pre-cut donor tissues used for DSAEK | 26 (96.3%) | 1 (3.7%) |
| Full thichness cornea with the low endothelial cell count | 7 (77.8%) | 2 (22.2%) |