BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The weight loss following Semaglutide treatment, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, might be responsible for some effects observed on the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease of obese mice. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Two groups of C57BL/6 male mice (n = 30/group) were fed the diets Control (C) or high-fat (HF) for 16 weeks. Then, separated into six new groups for an additional four weeks (n = 10/group) and treated with Semaglutide (S, 40 µg/kg) or paired feeding (PF) with S groups (C; C-S; C-PF; HF; HF-S; HF-PF). RESULTS: Semaglutide reduced energy consumption leading to weight loss. Simultaneously it improved glucose intolerance, glycated hemoglobin, insulin resistance/sensitivity, plasma lipids, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Semaglutide and paired feeding mitigated liver steatosis and adipose differentiation-related protein (Plin2) expression. Semaglutide also improved hormones and adipokines, reduced lipogenesis and inflammation, and increased beta-oxidation. Semaglutide lessened liver glucose uptake and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Among the 14 genes analyzed, 13 were modified by Semaglutide (93 %, six genes were changed exclusively by Semaglutide, and seven other genes were affected by the combination of Semaglutide and paired feeding). In seven genes, the paired diet showed no effect (50% of the genes tested). No marker was affected exclusively by paired feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide and the consequent weight loss reduced obese mice liver inflammation, insulin resistance, and ER stress. However, weight loss alone did show few or no action on some significant study findings, like liver steatosis, leptin, insulin, resistin, and amylin. Furthermore, hepatic inflammation mediated by MCP-1 and partially by TNF-alpha and IL6 were also not reduced by weight loss. Furthermore, weight loss alone did not lessen hepatic lipogenesis as determined by the findings of SREBP-1c, CHREBP, PPAR-alpha, and SIRT1. Semaglutide was implicated in improving glucose uptake and lessening ER stress by reducing GADD45, independent of weight loss.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: The weight loss following Semaglutide treatment, a GLP-1 receptor agonist, might be responsible for some effects observed on the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease of obese mice. SUBJECTS/ METHODS: Two groups of C57BL/6 male mice (n = 30/group) were fed the diets Control (C) or high-fat (HF) for 16 weeks. Then, separated into six new groups for an additional four weeks (n = 10/group) and treated with Semaglutide (S, 40 µg/kg) or paired feeding (PF) with S groups (C; C-S; C-PF; HF; HF-S; HF-PF). RESULTS: Semaglutide reduced energy consumption leading to weight loss. Simultaneously it improved glucose intolerance, glycated hemoglobin, insulin resistance/sensitivity, plasma lipids, and gastric inhibitory polypeptide. Semaglutide and paired feeding mitigated liver steatosis and adipose differentiation-related protein (Plin2) expression. Semaglutide also improved hormones and adipokines, reduced lipogenesis and inflammation, and increased beta-oxidation. Semaglutide lessened liver glucose uptake and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. Among the 14 genes analyzed, 13 were modified by Semaglutide (93 %, six genes were changed exclusively by Semaglutide, and seven other genes were affected by the combination of Semaglutide and paired feeding). In seven genes, the paired diet showed no effect (50% of the genes tested). No marker was affected exclusively by paired feeding. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide and the consequent weight loss reduced obese mice liver inflammation, insulin resistance, and ER stress. However, weight loss alone did show few or no action on some significant study findings, like liver steatosis, leptin, insulin, resistin, and amylin. Furthermore, hepatic inflammation mediated by MCP-1 and partially by TNF-alpha and IL6 were also not reduced by weight loss. Furthermore, weight loss alone did not lessen hepatic lipogenesis as determined by the findings of SREBP-1c, CHREBP, PPAR-alpha, and SIRT1. Semaglutide was implicated in improving glucose uptake and lessening ER stress by reducing GADD45, independent of weight loss.
Authors: A Katz; S S Nambi; K Mather; A D Baron; D A Follmann; G Sullivan; M J Quon Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Grace Guzman; Elizabeth M Brunt; Lydia M Petrovic; Gregorio Chejfec; Thomas J Layden; Scott J Cotler Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Philip N Newsome; Kristine Buchholtz; Kenneth Cusi; Martin Linder; Takeshi Okanoue; Vlad Ratziu; Arun J Sanyal; Anne-Sophie Sejling; Stephen A Harrison Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2020-11-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Richard G Peterson; Charles Van Jackson; Karen M Zimmerman; Jorge Alsina-Fernandez; M Dodson Michael; Paul J Emmerson; Tamer Coskun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-06-22 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robert F Kushner; Salvatore Calanna; Melanie Davies; Dror Dicker; W Timothy Garvey; Bryan Goldman; Ildiko Lingvay; Mette Thomsen; Thomas A Wadden; Sean Wharton; John P H Wilding; Domenica Rubino Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Sandra Buratta; Y Shimanaka; E Costanzi; S Ni; L Urbanelli; N Kono; F Morena; K Sagini; S Giovagnoli; R Romani; M Gargaro; H Arai; C Emiliani Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-25 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Myroslava V Vatashchuk; Maria M Bayliak; Viktoria V Hurza; Kenneth B Storey; Volodymyr I Lushchak Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 3.246