Objective: Chronic wounds have risen to epidemic proportions in the United States and can have an emotional, physical, and financial toll on patients. By leveraging data within the electronic health record (EHR), machine learning models offer the opportunity to facilitate earlier identification of wounds at risk of not healing or healing after an abnormally long time, which may improve treatment decisions and patient outcomes. Machine learning models in this study were built to predict chronic wound healing time. Approach: Machine learning models were developed using EHR data to predict patients at risk of having wounds not heal within 4, 8, and 12 weeks from the start of treatment. The models were trained on three data sets of 1,220,576 wounds, including 187 covariates describing patient demographics, comorbidities, and wound characteristics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the models. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to analyze variable importance in predictions and enhance clinical interpretations. Results: The 4-, 8-, and 12-week gradient-boosted decision tree models achieved AUC's of 0.854, 0.855, and 0.853, respectively. Days in treatment, wound depth and location, and wound area were the most influential predictors of wounds at risk of not healing. Innovation: Machine learning models can accurately predict chronic wound healing time using EHR data. SHAP values can give insight into how patient-specific variables influenced predictions. Conclusion: Accurate models identifying patients with chronic wounds at risk of non or slow healing are feasible and can be incorporated into routine wound care.
Objective: Chronic wounds have risen to epidemic proportions in the United States and can have an emotional, physical, and financial toll on patients. By leveraging data within the electronic health record (EHR), machine learning models offer the opportunity to facilitate earlier identification of wounds at risk of not healing or healing after an abnormally long time, which may improve treatment decisions and patient outcomes. Machine learning models in this study were built to predict chronic wound healing time. Approach: Machine learning models were developed using EHR data to predict patients at risk of having wounds not heal within 4, 8, and 12 weeks from the start of treatment. The models were trained on three data sets of 1,220,576 wounds, including 187 covariates describing patient demographics, comorbidities, and wound characteristics. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the accuracy of the models. Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) were used to analyze variable importance in predictions and enhance clinical interpretations. Results: The 4-, 8-, and 12-week gradient-boosted decision tree models achieved AUC's of 0.854, 0.855, and 0.853, respectively. Days in treatment, wound depth and location, and wound area were the most influential predictors of wounds at risk of not healing. Innovation: Machine learning models can accurately predict chronic wound healing time using EHR data. SHAP values can give insight into how patient-specific variables influenced predictions. Conclusion: Accurate models identifying patients with chronic wounds at risk of non or slow healing are feasible and can be incorporated into routine wound care.
Entities:
Keywords:
chronic wounds; informatics; personalized health care
Authors: William J Ennis; Rachel A Hoffman; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Robert S Kirsner; Hanna M Gordon Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2017-11-06 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Dirk T Ubbink; Robert Lindeboom; Anne M Eskes; Huub Brull; Dink A Legemate; Hester Vermeulen Journal: Int Wound J Date: 2013-09-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Chandan K Sen; Gayle M Gordillo; Sashwati Roy; Robert Kirsner; Lynn Lambert; Thomas K Hunt; Finn Gottrup; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Michael T Longaker Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2009 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Kenneth Jung; Scott Covington; Chandan K Sen; Michael Januszyk; Robert S Kirsner; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Nigam H Shah Journal: Wound Repair Regen Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.617
Authors: Caroline E Fife; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Ryan S Barrett; Brett Thomson Journal: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 4.730