Deepika Mohan1, Chung-Chou Chang2, Baruch Fischhoff3, Matthew R Rosengart4, Derek C Angus5, Donald M Yealy6, Amber E Barnato7. 1. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,. Electronic address: mohand@upmc.edu. 2. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Engineering and Environmental Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 4. Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 7. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Under-triage in trauma remains prevalent, in part because of decisions made by physicians at non-trauma centers. We developed two digital behavior change interventions to recalibrate physician heuristics (pattern recognition), and randomized 688 emergency medicine physicians to use the interventions or to a control. In this observational follow-up, we evaluated whether exposure to the interventions changed physician performance in practice. METHODS: We obtained 2016 - 2018 Medicare claims for severely injured patients, linked the names of trial participants to National Provider Identifiers (NPIs), and identified claims filed by trial participants for injured patients presenting to non-trauma centers in the year before and after their trial. The primary outcome measure was the triage status of severely injured patients. RESULTS: We linked 670 (97%) participants to NPIs, identified claims filed for severely injured patients by 520 (76%) participants, and claims filed at non-trauma centers by 228 (33%). Most participants were white (64%), male (67%), and had more than three years of experience (91%). Patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 16 (IQR 16 - 17), and primarily sustained neuro-trauma. After adjustment, patients treated by physicians randomized to the interventions experienced less under-triage in the year after the trial than before (41% versus 58% [-17%], P = 0.015); patients treated by physicians randomized to the control experienced no difference in under-triage (49% versus 56% [-7%], P = 0.35). The difference-in-the-difference was non-significant (10%, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to track trial participants' performance in national claims. Sample size limitations constrained causal inference about the effect of the interventions.
BACKGROUND: Under-triage in trauma remains prevalent, in part because of decisions made by physicians at non-trauma centers. We developed two digital behavior change interventions to recalibrate physician heuristics (pattern recognition), and randomized 688 emergency medicine physicians to use the interventions or to a control. In this observational follow-up, we evaluated whether exposure to the interventions changed physician performance in practice. METHODS: We obtained 2016 - 2018 Medicare claims for severely injured patients, linked the names of trial participants to National Provider Identifiers (NPIs), and identified claims filed by trial participants for injured patients presenting to non-trauma centers in the year before and after their trial. The primary outcome measure was the triage status of severely injured patients. RESULTS: We linked 670 (97%) participants to NPIs, identified claims filed for severely injured patients by 520 (76%) participants, and claims filed at non-trauma centers by 228 (33%). Most participants were white (64%), male (67%), and had more than three years of experience (91%). Patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 16 (IQR 16 - 17), and primarily sustained neuro-trauma. After adjustment, patients treated by physicians randomized to the interventions experienced less under-triage in the year after the trial than before (41% versus 58% [-17%], P = 0.015); patients treated by physicians randomized to the control experienced no difference in under-triage (49% versus 56% [-7%], P = 0.35). The difference-in-the-difference was non-significant (10%, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible to track trial participants' performance in national claims. Sample size limitations constrained causal inference about the effect of the interventions.
Authors: Deepika Mohan; David J Wallace; Samantha J Kerti; Derek C Angus; Matthew R Rosengart; Amber E Barnato; Donald M Yealy; Baruch Fischhoff; Chung-Chou Chang; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2019-12-18 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Brian Celso; Joseph Tepas; Barbara Langland-Orban; Etienne Pracht; Linda Papa; Lawrence Lottenberg; Lewis Flint Journal: J Trauma Date: 2006-02
Authors: Arjun K Venkatesh; Hao Mei; Keith E Kocher; Michael Granovsky; Ziad Obermeyer; Erica S Spatz; Craig Rothenberg; Harlan M Krumholz; Zhenqui Lin Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-03-17 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: David Gomez; Barbara Haas; Charles de Mestral; Sunjay Sharma; Marvin Hsiao; Brandon Zagorski; Gordon Rubenfeld; Joel G Ray; Avery B Nathens Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: James Forrest Calland; Angela M Ingraham; Niels Martin; Gary T Marshall; Carl I Schulman; Tristan Stapleton; Robert D Barraco Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Deepika Mohan; Derek C Angus; Daniel Ricketts; Coreen Farris; Baruch Fischhoff; Matthew R Rosengart; Donald M Yealy; Amber E Barnato Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-08-25 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Deepika Mohan; Baruch Fischhoff; Derek C Angus; Matthew R Rosengart; David J Wallace; Donald M Yealy; Coreen Farris; Chung-Chou H Chang; Samantha Kerti; Amber E Barnato Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205