Literature DB >> 34463421

Jail as a Point of Contraceptive Care Access: Needs and Preferences Among Women in an Urban Jail.

Kyl Myers1, Cristen Dalessandro1, Claudia Geist2, Carolyn Sufrin3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Individuals who are incarcerated in the United States often struggle to access family planning care because of the common practice of jails not providing contraceptives on site. However, less is known about the contraceptive needs and preferences, including the desirability of intrauterine devices and implants, among those who are incarcerated.
METHODS: Cross-sectional, in-person surveys were administered to 148 reproductive-age women (aged 18-48) incarcerated at an urban jail in Utah to identify women's contraceptive needs and preferences while incarcerated. We used summary statistics and logistic regression to investigate relationships between demographic characteristics, the desire to access contraceptive services while incarcerated, and interest in specific contraceptive methods.
RESULTS: Surveys indicate a high interest in accessing contraceptives while in jail (73%). Participants who were more likely to prefer access to contraceptive services in jail were also more likely to be interested in the injectable (odds ratio [OR], 4.75; 95% CI, 1.03-21.94), the implant (OR, 8.44; 95% CI, 1.70-41.99), and intrauterine devices (OR, 10.04; 95% CI, 3.46-29.20) than participants indicating no desire to access contraceptive services while in jail. DISCUSSION: Jails could be an access point for contraceptive methods requiring health care provider intervention in the state of Utah. However, care must be taken due to broader historical legacies of reproductive coercion in carceral settings.
© 2021 by the American College of Nurse-Midwives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Utah; contraception; correctional health care; incarceration; jails

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34463421      PMCID: PMC8664974          DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health        ISSN: 1526-9523            Impact factor:   2.388


  23 in total

1.  Racial/ethnic sexual health disparities among incarcerated women.

Authors:  Loida E Bonney; Jennifer G Clarke; Emma M Simmons; Jennifer S Rose; Josiah D Rich
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.798

2.  Reproductive Justice, Health Disparities And Incarcerated Women in the United States.

Authors:  Carolyn Sufrin; Alexa Kolbi-Molinas; Rachel Roth
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-22

3.  Pregnant Women in Prison and Jail Don't Count: Data Gaps on Maternal Health and Incarceration.

Authors:  Jennifer Bronson; Carolyn Sufrin
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Highly Effective Birth Control Use Before and After Women's Incarceration.

Authors:  Megha Ramaswamy; Hsiang-Feng Chen; Karen L Cropsey; Jennifer G Clarke; Patricia J Kelly
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 2.681

5.  An Examination of Care Practices of Pregnant Women Incarcerated in Jail Facilities in the United States.

Authors:  C M Kelsey; Nickole Medel; Carson Mullins; Danielle Dallaire; Catherine Forestell
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2017-06

6.  Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  The contraceptive needs of incarcerated women.

Authors:  Galen J Hale; Krista L Oswalt; Karen L Cropsey; Gabriella C Villalobos; Sara E Ivey; Catherine A Matthews
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  Happiness about unintended pregnancy and its relationship to contraceptive desires among a predominantly Latina cohort.

Authors:  Abigail R A Aiken
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2015-06-11

9.  The myth of menstruation: how menstrual regulation and suppression impact contraceptive choice.

Authors:  Andrea L DeMaria; Beth Sundstrom; Stephanie Meier; Abigail Wiseley
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.809

Review 10.  Contraception need and available services among incarcerated women in the United States: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mishka S Peart; Andrea K Knittel
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2020-03-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.