Samuel W Terman1,2, Wesley T Kerr1,3, Zachary A Marcum4, Lu Wang5, James F Burke1,2. 1. Department of Neurology, University of Michigan,, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 2. University of Michigan Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. 3. Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4. Department of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to characterize trajectories of antiseizure medication (ASM) adherence in adults with newly treated epilepsy and to determine predictors of trajectories. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare. We included beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy (one or more ASM and none in the preceding 2 years, plus International Classification of Diseases codes) in 2010-2013. We calculated the proportion of days covered (proportion of total days with any ASM pill supply) for 8 quarters or until death. Group-based trajectory models characterized and determined predictors of trajectories. RESULTS: We included 24 923 beneficiaries. Models identified four groups: early adherent (60%), early nonadherent (18%), late adherent (11%), and late nonadherent (11%). Numerous predictors were associated with being in the early nonadherent versus early adherent group: non-White race (e.g., Black, odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-1.8), region (e.g., South vs. Northeast: OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4), and once daily initial medication (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.0-1.3). Predictors associated with decreased odds of being in the early nonadherent group included older age (OR = .9 per decade, 95% CI = .9-.9), female sex (OR = .9, 95% CI = .8-1.0), full Medicaid eligibility (OR = .6, 95% CI = .4-.8), neurologist visit (OR = .6, 95% CI = .6-.7), and initial older generation ASM (OR = .6, 95% CI = .6-.7). SIGNIFICANCE: We identified four ASM adherence trajectories in individuals with newly treated epilepsy. Whereas risk factors for early nonadherence such as race or geographic region are nonmodifiable, our work highlighted a modifiable risk factor for early nonadherence: lacking a neurologist. These data may guide future interventions aimed at improving ASM adherence, in terms of both timing and target populations.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to characterize trajectories of antiseizure medication (ASM) adherence in adults with newly treated epilepsy and to determine predictors of trajectories. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare. We included beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy (one or more ASM and none in the preceding 2 years, plus International Classification of Diseases codes) in 2010-2013. We calculated the proportion of days covered (proportion of total days with any ASM pill supply) for 8 quarters or until death. Group-based trajectory models characterized and determined predictors of trajectories. RESULTS: We included 24 923 beneficiaries. Models identified four groups: early adherent (60%), early nonadherent (18%), late adherent (11%), and late nonadherent (11%). Numerous predictors were associated with being in the early nonadherent versus early adherent group: non-White race (e.g., Black, odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.5-1.8), region (e.g., South vs. Northeast: OR = 1.2, 95% CI = 1.1-1.4), and once daily initial medication (OR = 1.1, 95% CI = 1.0-1.3). Predictors associated with decreased odds of being in the early nonadherent group included older age (OR = .9 per decade, 95% CI = .9-.9), female sex (OR = .9, 95% CI = .8-1.0), full Medicaid eligibility (OR = .6, 95% CI = .4-.8), neurologist visit (OR = .6, 95% CI = .6-.7), and initial older generation ASM (OR = .6, 95% CI = .6-.7). SIGNIFICANCE: We identified four ASM adherence trajectories in individuals with newly treated epilepsy. Whereas risk factors for early nonadherence such as race or geographic region are nonmodifiable, our work highlighted a modifiable risk factor for early nonadherence: lacking a neurologist. These data may guide future interventions aimed at improving ASM adherence, in terms of both timing and target populations.
Authors: E Wayne Holden; Elizabeth Grossman; Hoang Thanh Nguyen; Margaret J Gunter; Becky Grebosky; Ann Von Worley; Leila Nelson; Scott Robinson; David J Thurman Journal: Dis Manag Date: 2005-02
Authors: Kendra Piper; Joshua Richman; Edward Faught; Roy Martin; Ellen Funkhouser; Jerzy P Szaflarski; Chen Dai; Lucia Juarez; Maria Pisu Journal: Epilepsy Behav Date: 2016-12-27 Impact factor: 2.937
Authors: Jessica M Franklin; William H Shrank; Juliana Pakes; Gabriel Sanfélix-Gimeno; Olga S Matlin; Troyen A Brennan; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Med Care Date: 2013-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Samuel Waller Terman; Wesley T Kerr; Carole E Aubert; Chloe E Hill; Zachary A Marcum; James F Burke Journal: Neurology Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Samuel Waller Terman; Chun C Lin; Wesley T Kerr; Lindsey B DeLott; Brian C Callaghan; James F Burke Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-06-15 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Samuel W Terman; Chang Wang; Lu Wang; Kees P J Braun; Willem M Otte; Geertruida Slinger; Wesley T Kerr; Morten I Lossius; Laura Bonnett; James F Burke; Anthony Marson Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2022-05-18 Impact factor: 6.740
Authors: Samuel W Terman; Joshua D Niznik; Geertruida Slinger; Willem M Otte; Kees P J Braun; Carole E Aubert; Wesley T Kerr; Cynthia M Boyd; James F Burke Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2022-09-01 Impact factor: 2.903