| Literature DB >> 34461985 |
Xiao Li1, Feng Xu1, Zheng Zhang1, Juan Guo1, Qi He1, Lu-Xi Song1, Dong Wu1, Li-Yu Zhou1, Ji-Ying Su1, Chao Xiao1, Chun-Kang Chang1, Ling-Yun Wu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: BCOR (BCL6 corepressor) is an epigenetic regulator gene involved in the specification of cell differentiation and body structure development. Recurrent somatic BCOR mutations have been identified in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). However, the clinical impact of BCOR mutations on MDS prognosis is controversial and the response of hypomethylating agents in MDS with BCOR mutations (BCORMUT) remains unknown.Entities:
Keywords: BCL6 corepressor; Decitabine; Myelodysplastic syndrome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34461985 PMCID: PMC8404357 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01157-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Fig. 1BCOR mutations in 43 MDS patients. a Localization of mutations identified in the BCOR gene. Each mutation is shown with an arrow. Exons of the BCOR gene are shown in colored boxes as indicated. b Co-occurrence of BCOR mutations with other gene mutations studied in 43 MDS patients. The intensity of the color indicates VAF of the gene mutations
Fig. 2Repartitioning of BCOR mutations and other mutations. For each gene, the percentage represents the estimated percentage of cells carrying the unique mutation. Panels a and b show examples of lower VAFs for BCOR mutations than other co-mutated genes (such as ASXL1 or TET2) in 2 patients. Panels c and D show BCOR mutations that are parallel with other mutations (DNMT3A or IDH2 mutations). In panels e and f, BCOR mutations presented as earlier events than other mutations (such as U2AF1 mutations). PN presented patient number in Additional file 1: Table S1
Comparison of clinical parameters between BCORMUT and BCORWT patients
| Characteristics | BCOR mutated ( | BCOR wild-type ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean) (year) | 55.8 | 55.9 | 0.970 |
| Sex (M/F) (no) (ratio) | 24/19 (1.3) | 371/262 (1.4) | 0.719 |
| Normal chromosomes ( | 31/43 (72.1) | 355/633 (56.1) | |
| RAEB (1 + 2) ( | 23/43 (53.5) | 174/633 (27.5) | |
| IPSS ≥ 1.5 ( | 15/43 (34.9) | 149/633 (23.5) | 0.093 |
| AML transformation ratio ( | 11/43 (25.6) | 97/633 (15.3) | 0.076 |
| Median overall survival ( | 32 | 36 | 0.214 |
| AML free survival ( | 16 | 35 |
The p value less than 0.05 is expressed in italics, suggesting a statistical difference
Fig. 3The overall survival and the cumulative incidence of AML transformation in patients harboring BCOR mutations versus patients without BCOR mutations. a Kaplan–Meier curve for OS and b cumulative incidence of AML transformation according to BCOR mutation status
Fig. 4RNA-sequencing analysis in patients with BCORMUT and BCORWT a Hierarchical clustering plot of the fold changes of gene expressions in three MDS patient with BCORMUT and three cases with BCORWT detected by RNA-sequencing (FC > 1.5, p values < 0.05). b KEGG pathway enrichment analysis c The top 10 enriched GO terms in biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. d HOX cluster genes including HOXA6, HOXB7and HOXB9 were significantly over-expressed in patients with BCORMUT
Characteristics of patients with BCORMUT or BCORWT received decitabine therapy
| Characteristics | BCORWT ( | BCORMUT ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, median (range), year | 62 (17–85) | 62 (23–80) | 0.558 |
| Gender, male:female, | 120:61 (66:34) | 7:7 (50:50) | 0.250 |
| WHO/FAB classification, | 0.891 | ||
| RCMD | 47 (26.0) | 3 (21.4) | |
| RAEB-1 | 57 (31.5) | 3 (21.4) | |
| RAEB-2 | 39 (21.5) | 5 (35.7) | |
| RAEB-t | 12 (6.6) | 1 (7.1) | |
| CMML-1 | 17 (9.4) | 1 (7.1) | |
| CMML-2 | 9 (5.0) | 1 (7.1) | |
| IPSS risk, | 0.858 | ||
| Intermediate-1 | 84 (46.4) | 7 (50.0) | |
| Intermediate-2 | 77 (42.5) | 5 (35.7) | |
| High | 20 (11.1) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Cytogenetic risk group, | |||
| Good | 108 (59.7) | 12 (85.7) | 0.072 |
| Intermediate | 31 (17.1) | 2 (14.3) | |
| Poor | 42 (23.2) | 0 | |
| Decitabine cycles, median (range), | 4 (1–11) | 4 (2–7) | 0.411 |
Gene mutation features of 14 BCORMUT patients who accepted decitabine induction
| Case no | Class | Cycles* | Response | BCOR mutations (VAF) | Concomitant mutations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAEB-t | 2 | CR | BCOR/4/C925Y (51%) | DHX9; WT1 |
| 2 | RAEB1 | 6 | CR | BCOR/11/K1452X (60%) | DNMT3A; ROBO1; STAG2 |
| 3 | RAEB2 | 4 | CR | BCOR/8/R1323W (50%) | NPM1 |
| 4 | CMML1 | 3 | CR | BCOR/8/K1339N (33%) | ASXL1; MPL; TET2; UPF3A |
| 5 | RAEB1 | 4 | mCR + HI | BCOR/4/A619fs (16%) | PHF6; RUNX1; TET2 |
| 6 | RCMD | 3 | CR | BCOR/4/Y361fs (85%) | NRAS; ROBO1; RUNX1; U2AF1 |
| 7 | RCMD | 4 | CR | BCOR/12/R1547*(49%) | ASXL1; RUNX1; SRSF2 |
| 8 | RAEB1 | 4 | mCR | BCOR/4/p819-819del (74%) | DNMT3A; IDH2; ROBO1; RUNX1 |
| 9 | RAEB2 | 4 | CR | BCOR/7/R1165X (29%)/11/C4326 + 1C > A (56%) | CEBPA; DNMT3A; RUNX1; STAG2;TET2; U2AF1 |
| 10 | RAEB2 | 4 | NR | BCOR/7/P1101fs (65%) | ITIH3 |
| 11 | RAEB2 | 4 | CR | BCOR/4/V912fs (32%) | ASXL1; STAG2 |
| 12 | RCMD | 2 | NR | BCOR/4/P483L (48%) | DHX9; EZH2; IDH1; U2AF1 |
| 13 | RAEB2 | 4 | mCR + HI | BCOR/4/T738fs (46%) | EZH2; MPL; RUNX1 |
| 14 | CMML2 | 2 | NR | BCOR/4/P483L (100%) | None |
*The induced decitabine cycles number means the course number of continuously accepted decitabine treatment (the durations between courses did not exceed 30 days); For the CR achieved patients with less than 4 induced courses. (No. 1, 4 and 6), the patients rejected continuously decitabine usage by themselves
Fig. 5Responses, mutation burden changes and survival status of patients harboring BCOR mutations treated with decitabine. Panel a shows the VAF changes from before to after decitabine therapy. Green circles indicated for CR patients and red circles for non-CR patients. Panel b shows the overall survival of BCORMUT and BCORWT patients who received decitabine therapy. In Panel c, the decitabine administration, response and survival status are indicated