| Literature DB >> 34461965 |
Wei Chen1,2, Shuang Ye1,3, Yutuan Wu1,3, Xuan Pei1,3, Libing Xiang1,3, Bo Ping1,4, Boer Shan5,6, Huijuan Yang7,8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate changes in peripheral lymphocyte subsets after splenectomy during cytoreductive surgery for advanced or recurrent ovarian cancers.Entities:
Keywords: Cytoreductive surgery; Flow cytometry; Lymphocyte; Ovarian Neoplasms; Splenectomy; Subpopulation
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34461965 PMCID: PMC8404261 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-021-00860-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ovarian Res ISSN: 1757-2215 Impact factor: 4.234
Fig. 1Schematic flowchart of the patients contained in the present study
Demographic and clinicopathological information (n = 83)
| Variables | Splenectomy ( | Non-splenectomy ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years), mean (SD, 95% CI) | 58 (9.7, 53–62) | 54 (8.8, 52–56) | 0.114* |
| Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (%) | 2 (10%) | 0 | 0.056# |
| Histology | |||
| High-grade serous carcinoma | 18 (90.0%) | 55 (87.3%) | 0.246# |
| Clear cell carcinoma | 0 | 5 (7.9%) | |
| Endometrioid | 1 (5.0%) | 1 (1.6%) | |
| Carcinosarcoma | 1 (5.0%) | 0 | |
| Low-grade serous carcinoma | 0 | 2 (3.2%) | |
| Pre-treatment CA125 (U/mL), media (range) | 718.9 (8.9–5000) a | 539.0 (8.3–5000) | 0.446** |
| FIGO stage (%) | |||
| IIIC | 11 (55.0%) | 33 (52.4%) | 0.838# |
| IV | 3 (15.0%) | 14 (22.2%) | |
| Recurrence | 6 (30.0%) | 16 (25.4%) | |
| Residual disease (%) | |||
| 0 | 13 (65.0%) | 40 (63.5%) | 0.903# |
| ≤ 1 cm (optimal) | 7 (35.0%) | 23 (36.5%) | |
| Platinum response (%) b | |||
| Sensitive | 14 (70.0%) | 51 (81.0%) | 0.185# |
| Resistant | 6 (30.0%) | 9 (14.3%) | |
P-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant
Abbreviations: FIGO The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics, CA125 Cancer Antigen 125
a The upper limit of CA 125 detection is 5000
b Sixteen patients in the splenectomy group and 40 patients in the control group were available for platinum response assessment
* Independent-Sample T-test
** Mann–Whitney U test
# chi-square or Fisher’s exact test
Distribution of peripheral lymphocyte subpopulations in the two cohorts before and after surgery
| Peripheral lymphocyte subsets | Splenectomy group | Non-splenectomy group | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pre | post | pre | post | |||||
| Percentage (%) | ||||||||
| T cells (CD3+) | 67.8 (17.3) | 68.9 (16.0) | 0.241 | 67.6 (14.48) | 69.1 (12.9) | 0.276 | 0.680 | 0.431 |
| CD3+CD8+ | 30.1 (12.2) | 26.2 (16.5) | 0.210 | 25.2 (12.50) | 27.1 (14.5) | 0.056 | 0.109 | 0.289 |
| CD8+CD28+ | 8.9 (4.1) | 7.6 (3.9) | 6.9 (4.3) | 6.8 (3.4) | 0.116 | 0.606 | ||
| CD3+CD4+ | 37.7 (7.1) | 35.5 (9.2) | 0.768 | 38.2 (12.8) | 39.7 (12.8) | 0.292 | 0.616 | 0.070 |
| Tregs (CD4+CD25+CD127low) | 13.2 (3.3) | 14.6 (4.1) | 0.344 | 12.8 (4.0) | 13.2 (4.2) | 0.477 | 0.461 | |
| CD4/CD8 | 1.2 (0.8) | 1.2 (0.8) | 0.746 | 1.6 (0.9) | 1.7 (1.3) | 0.125 | ||
| NK cells (CD3−CD16+56+) | 16.1 (12.9) | 11.2 (13.9) | 0.312 | 15.8 (14.0) | 13.5 (13.3) | 0.721 | 0.563 | |
| B cells (CD3−CD19+) | 10.5 (9.5) | 11.4 (8.6) | 0.922 | 11.3 (6.9) | 13.9 (7.7) | 0.880 | 0.195 | |
| HLA-DR+ | 22.5 (13.6) | 26.2 (19.1) | 22.8 (18.2) | 26.3 (15.8) | 0.812 | 0.864 | ||
| CD3+/HLA-DR+ | 6.3 (17.4) | 9.3 (19.4) | 11.3 (13.9) | 11.3 (14.6) | 0.198 | 0.563 | 0.969 | |
| CD3−/HLA-DR+ | 10.3 (8.5) | 13.7 (11.2) | 0.177 | 11.6 (6.8) | 13.6 (6.3) | 0.570 | 0.843 | |
| CD3+/HLA-DR− | 59.2 (17.3) | 49.6 (22.6) | 57.4 (17.2) | 55.9 (18.6) | 0.669 | 0.093 | ||
| Absolute number (cell/ul) | ||||||||
| T cells (CD3+) | 942 (522) | 1079 (502) | 0.522 | 1101 (466) | 821 (543) | 0.226 | ||
| CD3+CD8+ | 406 (290) | 411 (261) | 0.709 | 416 (251) | 313 (237) | 0.868 | ||
| CD3+CD4+ | 495 (273) | 611 (263) | 0.490 | 594 (416) | 465 (311) | 0.111 | 0.140 | |
| NK cells (CD3−CD16+56+) | 201 (47) | 161 (276) | 0.595 | 255 (236) | 162 (173) | 0.250 | 0.510 | |
| B cells (CD3−CD19+) | 152 (194) | 149 (158) | 0.241 | 164 (133) | 160 (147) | 0.380 | 0.572 | 0.570 |
P2 = Splenectomy vs. Control after surgery; P 3 = Preoperative vs. Postoperative in the splenectomy cohort; P 4 = Preoperative vs. Postoperative in the control cohort
a Numbers were presented as median (quartile range)
b Pre = before surgery; Post = after surgery
cP values with statistical significance were denoted. P 1 = Splenectomy vs. Control before surgery
Fig. 2Comparisons with the statistical significance of circulating lymphocyte subsets after surgery (splenectomy vs. non-splenectomy)
Fig. 3Changes in peripheral lymphocyte absolute numbers in the two cohorts after upfront surgery. Abbreviations: Pre- = before surgery; Post- = after surgery. ns = not significant; *, P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Fig. 4Changes in peripheral lymphocyte distribution in the two cohorts after upfront surgery. Abbreviations: Pre- = before surgery; Post- = after surgery. NS = not significant; *, P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01
Fig. 5Kaplan–Meier analysis of overall survival and progression-free survival in patients who underwent splenectomy (blue) or non-splenectomy (purple) during cytoreductive surgery