Nina E Ross1, Tinsley G Webster2, Camille A Tastenhoye3, Alisse K Hauspurg4, Jill E Foust5, Priya R Gopalan6, Susan Hatters Friedman7. 1. Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: Nina.ross@uhhospitals.org. 2. Medical Student, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA. 3. Psychiatry Resident, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 5. Research & Instruction Librarian Health Sciences Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. 6. Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. 7. Director, Division of Forensic Psychiatry, UH Cleveland Medical Center, The Phillip J. Resnick Professor of Forensic Psychiatry, Professor of Reproductive Biology, Professor of Pediatrics, Adjunct Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Decision-making capacity can be affected by psychiatric illness. Women who have psychiatric illness who make decisions about their reproductive health may require evaluation of their decision-making capacity. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to characterize existing literature about capacity evaluations in women with psychiatric illness making reproductive decisions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases through July 2020. Articles were evaluated for relevance to inclusion criteria, first by title and abstract screening then by reading the full text of articles. Our inclusion criteria were case reports and studies that involved women of childbearing age with psychiatric illness making obstetrical decisions for whom decision-making capacity was evaluated. We qualitatively analyzed our data by examining themes within the studies, such as the circumstances of the referral and characteristics of reproductive decision-making. We also collected information about the clinical circumstances, such as the clinical setting (e.g., inpatient or outpatient, in primarily psychiatric or obstetric care) and who made the determination of capacity. RESULTS: We identified 18 articles, which included 22 distinct patient cases and 27 distinct obstetrical decisions. Decisions about termination of pregnancy were most common, which were 10 of 27 decisions. Decisions about timing and mode of delivery accounted for 7 and 5 decisions, respectively. The most common psychiatric diagnosis reported was schizophrenia, which was present in 8 patients. Major depression and bipolar disorder were also frequently reported, present in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who make health care decisions must have decision-making capacity. A patient with psychiatric illness does not inherently lack capacity, and in fact, most patients with psychiatric illness have decision-making capacity. Psychiatric illness, however, can add complexity to obstetrical medical decision-making. Reasons for this complexity include the involvement of many stakeholders, the often time-sensitive nature of these decisions, and the potentially unpredictable course of psychiatric illness. Successful management of these cases involves multidisciplinary collaboration, the use of preventative ethics through advanced care planning, and identification of a guardian or surrogate decision-maker when a patient is determined to lack decision-making capacity or for a patient who has capacity through advanced care planning. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020143434.
BACKGROUND: Decision-making capacity can be affected by psychiatric illness. Women who have psychiatric illness who make decisions about their reproductive health may require evaluation of their decision-making capacity. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to characterize existing literature about capacity evaluations in women with psychiatric illness making reproductive decisions. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review searching PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid PsycINFO, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases through July 2020. Articles were evaluated for relevance to inclusion criteria, first by title and abstract screening then by reading the full text of articles. Our inclusion criteria were case reports and studies that involved women of childbearing age with psychiatric illness making obstetrical decisions for whom decision-making capacity was evaluated. We qualitatively analyzed our data by examining themes within the studies, such as the circumstances of the referral and characteristics of reproductive decision-making. We also collected information about the clinical circumstances, such as the clinical setting (e.g., inpatient or outpatient, in primarily psychiatric or obstetric care) and who made the determination of capacity. RESULTS: We identified 18 articles, which included 22 distinct patient cases and 27 distinct obstetrical decisions. Decisions about termination of pregnancy were most common, which were 10 of 27 decisions. Decisions about timing and mode of delivery accounted for 7 and 5 decisions, respectively. The most common psychiatric diagnosis reported was schizophrenia, which was present in 8 patients. Major depression and bipolar disorder were also frequently reported, present in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients who make health care decisions must have decision-making capacity. A patient with psychiatric illness does not inherently lack capacity, and in fact, most patients with psychiatric illness have decision-making capacity. Psychiatric illness, however, can add complexity to obstetrical medical decision-making. Reasons for this complexity include the involvement of many stakeholders, the often time-sensitive nature of these decisions, and the potentially unpredictable course of psychiatric illness. Successful management of these cases involves multidisciplinary collaboration, the use of preventative ethics through advanced care planning, and identification of a guardian or surrogate decision-maker when a patient is determined to lack decision-making capacity or for a patient who has capacity through advanced care planning. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020143434.
Authors: Benjamin D Brody; Simriti K Chaudhry; Julie B Penzner; Ellen C Meltzer; Marc Dubin Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 18.112