Literature DB >> 34461195

Adolescent female rats prone to the activity based anorexia (ABA) paradigm have altered hedonic responses and cortical astrocyte density compared to resistant animals.

Matthew M Hurley1, Sarah C Collica2, S Andrew Aston2, Lucas J Wiles2, Raphael C Weiner2, Aditi Biswas2, Harshit Bhasin2, Aliasgher I Sabir2, Ethan J Goodman2, Ritika Purbey2, Kellie L K Tamashiro2, Timothy H Moran2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Anhedonia, which in part involves the lack of pleasure in consuming palatable food, is a long-lasting symptom observed in patients both when acutely ill and when long term recovered from Anorexia Nervosa. The neurocircuitry underlying this phenomenon is not well understood. Here we use the preclinical activity-based anorexia (ABA) model in adolescent female rats to assess the impact of excessive exercise, limited food intake and acute weight loss, on adolescent female rat orofacial responding to intraoral sucrose, as measured by the taste reactivity test (TRT). Animals were identified as either prone or resistant to this paradigm based on a weight loss criterion. Measures of food intake, running wheel activity, taste reactivity and medial prefrontal cortex astrocyte expression were compared across groups.
METHODS: Adolescent female rats implanted with an intraoral catheter were given a TRT using 1 M (M) sucrose at baseline, max weight loss (25% weight loss from start of ABA or 7 full days on the paradigm) or 10 days recovered from the ABA paradigm. Animals were sacrificed after the final TRT and astrocyte density was measured via immunohistochemistry.
RESULTS: Animals resistant to the ABA paradigm ran less than prone animals during the ABA period. Additionally, we found that resistant animals displayed more cumulative 'liking' responses to sucrose compared to prone animals at maximum weight loss. Finally, we found prone animals 10-days recovered from ABA had reduced medial prefrontal cortex astrocyte density compared to levels in resistant animals. DISCUSSION: Rats presented with the physiological challenge of the ABA paradigm either adapt their behavior to stabilize their body weight (i.e. resistant), or rapidly lose weight (i.e. prone). Furthermore, we found that prone animals have reduced orofacial responding to 1 M sucrose at maximum weight loss compared to responses in resistant animals, and this anhedonia-like behavior may be a result of reduced astrocyte density that affects cortical function.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Animal models; Anorexia nervosa; Eating disorders; Hedonic

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34461195     DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appetite        ISSN: 0195-6663            Impact factor:   3.868


  6 in total

1.  Anhedonia in Eating Disorders.

Authors:  Susan M Murray; Carina S Brown; Walter H Kaye; Christina E Wierenga
Journal:  Curr Top Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022

2.  The Role of Dopamine in Contributing to Vulnerable and Resilient Phenotypes in a Mouse Model of Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Sasha Gorrell
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 12.810

Review 3.  The Role of Glial Cells in Regulating Feeding Behavior: Potential Relevance to Anorexia Nervosa.

Authors:  Linda Frintrop; Stefanie Trinh; Jochen Seitz; Markus Kipp
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Glial cells in anorexia.

Authors:  Daniel Reyes-Haro
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 6.147

5.  In pursuit of biomarkers for predicting susceptibility to activity-based anorexia in adolescent female rats.

Authors:  Laura Karina Milton; Timothy Patton; Meredith O'Keeffe; Brian John Oldfield; Claire Jennifer Foldi
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 5.791

6.  Adolescent female rats recovered from the activity-based anorexia display blunted hedonic responding.

Authors:  Matthew M Hurley; Ashraf N Nawari; Victoria X Chen; Shannon C O'Brien; Aliasgher I Sabir; Ethan J Goodman; Lucas J Wiles; Aditi Biswas; Sean Andrew Aston; Seva G Khambadkone; Kellie L Tamashiro; Timothy H Moran
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 5.791

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.