Literature DB >> 34461035

Effect of the STAMP (Sharing and Talking About My Preferences) Intervention on Completing Multiple Advance Care Planning Activities in Ambulatory Care : A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Terri R Fried1, Andrea L Paiva2, Colleen A Redding2, Lynne Iannone3, John R O'Leary3, Maria Zenoni3, Megan M Risi4, Slawomir Mejnartowicz5, Joseph S Rossi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interventions with the potential for broad reach in ambulatory settings are necessary to achieve a life course approach to advance care planning.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of a computer-tailored, behavioral health model-based intervention on the engagement of adults in advance care planning recruited from ambulatory care settings.
DESIGN: Cluster randomized controlled trial with participant-level analysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03137459).
SETTING: 10 pairs of primary and selected specialty care practices matched on patient sociodemographic information. PARTICIPANTS: English-speaking adults aged 55 years or older; 454 adults at practices randomly assigned to usual care and 455 at practices randomly assigned to intervention. INTERVENTION: Brief telephone or web-based assessment generating a mailed, individually tailored feedback report with a stage-matched brochure at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was completion of the following 4 advance care planning activities at 6 months: identifying and communicating with a trusted person about views on quality versus quantity of life, assignment of a health care agent, completion of a living will, and ensuring that the documents are in the medical record-assessed by a blinded interviewer. Secondary outcomes were completion of individual advance care planning activities.
RESULTS: Participants were 64% women and 76% White. The mean age was 68.3 years (SD, 8.3). The predicted probability of completing all advance care planning activities in usual care sites was 8.2% (95% CI, 4.9% to 11.4%) versus 14.1% (CI, 11.0% to 17.2%) in intervention sites (adjusted risk difference, 5.2 percentage points [CI, 1.6 to 8.8 percentage points]). Prespecified subgroup analysis found no statistically significant interactions between the intervention and age, education, or race. LIMITATIONS: The study was done in a single region and excluded non-English speaking participants. No information was collected about nonparticipants.
CONCLUSION: A brief, easily delivered, tailored print intervention increased participation in advance care planning in ambulatory care settings. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: National Institute of Nursing Research and National Institute of Aging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34461035      PMCID: PMC8711627          DOI: 10.7326/M21-1007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  37 in total

Review 1.  Do We Know What We Mean? An Examination of the Use of the Phrase "Goals of Care" in the Literature.

Authors:  Kyle P Edmonds; Toluwalase A Ajayi
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Patterns and Trends in Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults Who Received Intensive Care at the End of Life.

Authors:  Brian L Block; Sun Young Jeon; Rebecca L Sudore; Michael A Matthay; W John Boscardin; Alexander K Smith
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 3.  Respecting Choices and Related Models of Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review of Published Evidence.

Authors:  Meredith A MacKenzie; Esther Smith-Howell; Patricia A Bomba; Salimah H Meghani
Journal:  Am J Hosp Palliat Care       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Stages of change for the component behaviors of advance care planning.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Colleen A Redding; Mark L Robbins; Andrea Paiva; John R O'Leary; Lynne Iannone
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Exploring the Digital Divide: Age and Race Disparities in Use of an Inpatient Portal.

Authors:  Daniel M Walker; Jennifer L Hefner; Naleef Fareed; Timothy R Huerta; Ann Scheck McAlearney
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.536

6.  Development of Personalized Health Messages to Promote Engagement in Advance Care Planning.

Authors:  Terri R Fried; Colleen A Redding; Mark L Robbins; Andrea L Paiva; John R O'Leary; Lynne Iannone
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Development and validation of a prognostic index for 4-year mortality in older adults.

Authors:  Sei J Lee; Karla Lindquist; Mark R Segal; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Distinguishing Wants vs Preferences for End-of-Life Care: Can You Tell Me What You Want, What You Really, Really Want?

Authors:  Davene R Wright
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-08-03

9.  Honoring Choices Minnesota: preliminary data from a community-wide advance care planning model.

Authors:  Kent S Wilson; Thomas E Kottke; Sue Schettle
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 10.  Deconstructing the Complexities of Advance Care Planning Outcomes: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ryan D McMahan; Ismael Tellez; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trends in advance care planning and end-of-life care among persons living with dementia requiring surrogate decision-making.

Authors:  Hiroshi Gotanda; Anne M Walling; David B Reuben; Marie Lauzon; Yusuke Tsugawa
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 7.538

2.  Exploring the Motivations for Completing Advance Care Directives: A Qualitative Study of Majority/Minority Israeli People Without Dementia.

Authors:  Perla Werner; Natalie Ulitsa; Hanan AboJabel
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 4.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.