Literature DB >> 34460360

Learning to Disentangle Inter-Subject Anatomical Variations in Electrocardiographic Data.

Prashnna K Gyawali, Jaideep Vitthal Murkute, Maryam Toloubidokhti, Xiajun Jiang, B Milan Horacek, John L Sapp, Linwei Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This work investigates the possibility of disentangled representation learning of inter-subject anatomical variations within electrocardiographic (ECG) data.
METHODS: Since ground truth anatomical factors are generally not known in clinical ECG for assessing the disentangling ability of the models, the presented work first proposes the SimECG data set, a 12-lead ECG data set procedurally generated with a controlled set of anatomical generative factors. Second, to perform such disentanglement, the presented method evaluates and compares deep generative models with latent density modeled by nonparametric Indian Buffet Process to account for the complex generative process of ECG data.
RESULTS: In the simulated data, the experiments demonstrate, for the first time, concrete evidence of the possibility to disentangle key generative anatomical factors within ECG data in separation from task-relevant generative factors. We achieve a disentanglement score of 92.1% while disentangling five anatomical generative factors and the task-relevant generative factor. In both simulated and real-data experiments, this work further provides quantitative evidence for the benefit of disentanglement learning on the downstream clinical task of localizing the origin of ventricular activation. Overall, the presented method achieves an improvement of around 18.5%, and 11.3% for the simulated dataset, and around 7.2%, and 3.6% for the real dataset, over baseline CNN, and standard generative model, respectively.
CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate the importance as well as the feasibility of the disentangled representation learning of inter-subject anatomical variations within ECG data. SIGNIFICANCE: This work suggests the important research direction to deal with the well-known challenge posed by the presence of significant inter-subject variations during an automated analysis of ECG data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34460360      PMCID: PMC8858595          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2021.3108164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  15 in total

1.  A computational model of the human left-ventricular epicardial myocyte.

Authors:  Vivek Iyer; Reza Mazhari; Raimond L Winslow
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Automated analysis of the 12-lead electrocardiogram to identify the exit site of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia.

Authors:  Miki Yokokawa; Tzu-Yu Liu; Kentaro Yoshida; Clayton Scott; Alfred Hero; Eric Good; Fred Morady; Frank Bogun
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  ADN: Artifact Disentanglement Network for Unsupervised Metal Artifact Reduction.

Authors:  Haofu Liao; Wei-An Lin; S Kevin Zhou; Jiebo Luo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Cardiac position sensitivity study in the electrocardiographic forward problem using stochastic collocation and boundary element methods.

Authors:  Darrell J Swenson; Sarah E Geneser; Jeroen G Stinstra; Robert M Kirby; Rob S MacLeod
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.934

5.  Physiological-model-constrained noninvasive reconstruction of volumetric myocardial transmembrane potentials.

Authors:  Linwei Wang; Heye Zhang; Ken C L Wong; Huafeng Liu; Pengcheng Shi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Sequential Factorized Autoencoder for Localizing the Origin of Ventricular Activation From 12-Lead Electrocardiograms.

Authors:  Prashnna Kumar Gyawali; B Milan Horacek; John L Sapp; Linwei Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Cardiologist-level arrhythmia detection and classification in ambulatory electrocardiograms using a deep neural network.

Authors:  Awni Y Hannun; Pranav Rajpurkar; Masoumeh Haghpanahi; Geoffrey H Tison; Codie Bourn; Mintu P Turakhia; Andrew Y Ng
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  The effect of obesity on electrocardiographic detection of hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy: recalibration against cardiac magnetic resonance.

Authors:  J C L Rodrigues; B McIntyre; A G Dastidar; S M Lyen; L E Ratcliffe; A E Burchell; E C Hart; C Bucciarelli-Ducci; M C K Hamilton; J F R Paton; A K Nightingale; N E Manghat
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 3.012

9.  The effect of precordial lead displacement on ECG morphology.

Authors:  Michał Kania; Hervé Rix; Małgorzata Fereniec; Heriberto Zavala-Fernandez; Dariusz Janusek; Tomasz Mroczka; Günter Stix; Roman Maniewski
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-19       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  2 in total

1.  Automatic Multichannel Electrocardiogram Record Classification Using XGBoost Fusion Model.

Authors:  Xiaohong Ye; Yuanqi Huang; Qiang Lu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 4.755

Review 2.  State-of-the-Art Deep Learning Methods on Electrocardiogram Data: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Georgios Petmezas; Leandros Stefanopoulos; Vassilis Kilintzis; Andreas Tzavelis; John A Rogers; Aggelos K Katsaggelos; Nicos Maglaveras
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-08-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.