Literature DB >> 34457953

Understanding Excellence: a Qualitative Analysis of High-Performing Learner Study Strategies.

Ryan R Landoll1, Layne D Bennion1, Lauren A Maggio1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Remediation in medical education tends to focus on the struggling learner. However, understanding successful learners may provide valuable insights to problematic academic behavior. This study explored core study strategies reported by high-performing medical school students.
METHOD: In the Fall of 2018 and 2019, high-performing first- and second-year medical students, defined as those who had performed over 90% on a national standardized assessment, were requested via e-mail to describe the study strategies that they believe contributed to their success. Student responses were analyzed using a template-driven approach, which drew upon common frameworks from cognitive learning theory.
RESULTS: Thirty-seven high-performing students provided brief unstructured descriptions of their study strategies. Retrieval practice-the cognitive learning strategy of attempting to draw out information to active recall, typically through means of self-quizzing, practice questions, or flashcards-was the most commonly endorsed strategy, followed by spaced repetition. Use of outside commercial resources was commonly referenced, and approximately one-third endorsed a perception that some form of regularly practiced self-care contributed to their academic success. DISCUSSION: Retrieval practice, particularly combined with some form of spaced repetition, is often attributed as contributing to the success of high-performing learners. The use of commercial resources bears further exploration and consideration. Finally, the finding that self-care was identified as a contribution to academic performance goes beyond a focus on self-care solely for medical student well-being. This is an important distinction for both medical education and future research in this area. © This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Academic success; High-performing learners; Medical education; Remediation

Year:  2021        PMID: 34457953      PMCID: PMC8368812          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-021-01279-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  16 in total

Review 1.  What is the impact of commercial test preparation courses on medical examination performance?

Authors:  William C McGaghie; Steven M Downing; Ramune Kubilius
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Medical students' perceptions of the factors influencing their academic performance: an exploratory interview study with high-achieving and re-sitting medical students.

Authors:  Mathew Todres; Zoi Tsimtsiou; Kalwant Sidhu; Anne Stephenson; Roger Jones
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 3.  Critical review: medical students' motivation after failure.

Authors:  Chris Holland
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.853

4.  Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology.

Authors:  John Dunlosky; Katherine A Rawson; Elizabeth J Marsh; Mitchell J Nathan; Daniel T Willingham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2013-01

5.  Metacognition in medical education.

Authors:  Ipekek Gonullu; Muge Artar
Journal:  Educ Health (Abingdon)       Date:  2014 May-Aug

6.  Factors Associated With Successful Research Departments A Qualitative Analysis of Family Medicine Research Bright Spots.

Authors:  Winston Liaw; Aimee Eden; Megan Coffman; Meera Nagaraj; Andrew Bazemore
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 1.756

7.  Why Open-Ended Survey Questions Are Unlikely to Support Rigorous Qualitative Insights.

Authors:  Kori A LaDonna; Taryn Taylor; Lorelei Lingard
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Twelve tips for medical students to establish a collaborative flashcard project.

Authors:  Michael Hart-Matyas; Alexandra Taylor; Han Joo Lee; Mark A Maclean; Amaris Hui; Anna Macleod
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  Answer changing in multiple choice assessment change that answer when in doubt--and spread the word!

Authors:  Daniel Bauer; Veronika Kopp; Martin R Fischer
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 2.463

10.  Student-directed retrieval practice is a predictor of medical licensing examination performance.

Authors:  Francis Deng; Jeffrey A Gluckstein; Douglas P Larsen
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.